Re: No new tax ... Labor leaves no doubt it is fairer than the highest

petzl wrote:
> On May 11, 8:29 pm, Hunter01 <hunte...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> No, that might happen down the track, exactly as Howard also said. At
>> this point the only real difference between the two of them is that
Rudd
>> seems to at least have put a bit of a framework on the idea in the form
>> of a pinned card, although that's not really a claim to fame, it's not
>> like Liberal would've had much option but to do it that way either.
> 
> So far these are "Yes Minister" decisions decided during last Howard
> government by the same "Yes Minister" brigade
> 
> KRudd's government has not the balls or clues as to the simplest of
> concepts like
> banning plastic shopping bags


He's very good at disguising new taxes (err ok, for the semantically 
beligerant like fags lets call it increasing old taxes) such as the 
alcopop tax as a "service to the community" however, even though in the 
same mouthful as saying this will cut younguns drinking the stuff he 
then goes on about all the money he's going to get based on absolutely 
no drop in the levels of drinking at all. He's got a bit to learn yet to 
get his lies right.

And don't even get me started on the "pc for every student" debacle....