On May 12, 1:06=A0am, fasgnadh <fasgn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hunter01 wrote:
> > petzl wrote:
> >> On May 11, 8:29 pm, Hunter01 <hunte...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> No, that might happen down the track, exactly as Howard also said.
At
> >>> this point the only real difference between the two of them is that
Ru=
dd
> >>> seems to at least have put a bit of a framework on the idea in the
for=
m
> >>> of a pinned card, although that's not really a claim to fame, it's
not=
> >>> like Liberal would've had much option but to do it that way either.
>
> >> So far these are "Yes Minister" decisions decided during last Howard
> >> government by the same "Yes Minister" brigade
>
> >> KRudd's government has not the balls or clues as to the simplest of
> >> concepts like
> >> banning plastic shopping bags
>
> Why? What would people wrap their garbage in?
>
> You want to go out and BUY plastic garbage bags to replace
> the ones you could bring your shopping home in?
>
Who gives a tinkers cuss? Labor don't
The wish to do something about plastic bags was a Labor Party
objective/promise not mine
<http://www.newmatilda.com/2008/03/11/garrett-plastic-bags>
or <http://tinyurl.com/4j44ct>
All that ever happens with Labor Party "meetings" now $Tax payer funded
$ is a great **** fight
The big sick joke is NOTHING would come of banning plastic shopping
bags except a cleaner environment
It is however proof that Labor are not capable of the simplest of
decisions that will benefit Australia.
Petzl
--
Australia's parliament needs to obey our Constitutions, the judiciary
must apply the law
Australians should preserve their "incredibly effective, strong and
successful constitution".
|
