"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:48284a89$0$17508$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tex wrote:
>> "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:482839ad$0$13945$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Tex wrote:
>>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>> PeterN wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 07:43:40 +1000, fasgnadh <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Ted Baillieu hunts for Lib traitors"
>>>>>>> 12/5/2008
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A FURIOUS Ted Baillieu has vowed to cleanse the
>>>>>>> Victorian Liberal Party"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought the voters were doing that for him!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> " of plotters out to get rid of him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, so it's just a Purge of Liberals who criticise
>>>>>>> Ted as leader.. that could be ANYONE! B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Mr Baillieu said yesterday that "cancerous elements"
>>>>>>> were undermining the party."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure, Brenda Nelson Alex Downer and Ted himself spring to mind!
>>>>>>> B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a long history of treachery and disunity among the
>>>>>>> Darwinian tory party
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any more cleansing of 'traitors' and 'cancerous elements'
>>>>>>> and there will be NO ONE LEFT!! B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "He accused a "deep-seated cell" of working for the ALP in an
>>>>>> Ted's misguided paranoia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> extraordinary day that sent shock waves through the beleaguered
>>>>>>> party."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Naturally the tory rabble blame everyone but themselves.
>>>>>>> If that desperate liar had any EVIDENCE of his slanders we
>>>>>>> would have heard of it by now. B^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But of course there are many Liberal voters who have given
>>>>>>> up on them and gone across to the ALP, it is hardly any
>>>>>>> surprise if those at the very heart of the organisation,
>>>>>>> frustrated with incompetence and inaction, follow the rest
>>>>>>> of the country and abandon the tory rabble completely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The simple fact is this: The criticism is coming RIGHT OUT
>>>>>>> OF LIBERAL PARTY HQ! B^D If that's Ted's definition of the
>>>>>>> ALP then he best lie down in a warm bath and open his wrists!
>>>>>>> B^p
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Two staff members sacked for posting damaging comments on a
website
>>>>>>> blog were not acting alone and more heads would roll, he said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Campaign officers Simon Morgan and John Osborn were fired
following
>>>>>>> a secret investigation that found they contributed to the
>>>>>>> invitation-only blog hewhostandsfornothing.blogspot.com"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like their criticism was directed at Nelson or
Costello,
>>>>>>> as much as Ted.. face it, Losers, you have a long tradition
>>>>>>> of standing for nothing! B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The website lampooned Mr Baillieu, dismissing him as lazy and
>>>>>>> incompetent."
>>>>>> fasgnadh is someone at the Liebral Party doing your work :)
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears so, and unlike me, they are PAID TO DO IT... B^)
>>>>>
>>>>> BY THE STUPID ****ING LIBERALS!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> How can they run a State, let alone the COUNTRY, when
>>>>> they can't even RUN AN OFFICE!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> From today's Age : Liberals' blogs of war, Paul Austin - May 12,
2008
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Baillieu hits out at 'traitors'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THE homepage was arresting: "Ted Baillieu must GO," it screamed,
>>>>>> complete with a picture of the Opposition Leader wearing a red
nose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The name of the blogsite was direct: "He who stands for nothing."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What was not clear to readers was that people behind the vitriol
were
>>>>>> not Labor Party stirrers but paid employees of Mr Baillieu's party,
>>>>>> who distributed their poison through the computers on their desks
at
>>>>>> Liberal HQ in Exhibition Street.
>>>>> Hey, how much do the tories pay for such scathing honesty? B^D
B^D
>>>>>
>>>>>> The now infamous blog was no impulsive flight of fancy: it was
first
>>>>>> put up late last year and not pulled down until last month, when
>>>>>> party
>>>>>> director Julian Sheezel discovered who was responsible and sacked
two
>>>>>> of his most trusted staff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The site did not limit its anonymous spite to Mr Baillieu, whom it
>>>>>> nicknamed Cottee's — "because he's thick and rich" —
>>>>> That will stick! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> and who was described as a "vile communist"
>>>>> that won't.. it is typical tory commie can kicking,
>>>>> they are blind ideologues stuck in the Class Wars
>>>>> of the 1950s.. thats why they loved Howard.
>>>>>
>>>>> > and a "vacuous moron".
>>>>>
>>>>> YOu can't sack a bloke for speaking the truth. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just about anyone seen to be associated with the moderate grouping
in
>>>>>> the party
>>>>>> was fair game,
>>>>> and that is the vile stink at the heart of what would otherwise
>>>>> just be another inadvertent tory joke, they are vicious slandering
>>>>> right wing nutjobs, who have pilloried small l liberals and driven
>>>>> them from the party!
>>>>>
>>>>> Just look at the vile rabble which infests Usenet now...
>>>>>
>>>>> When we used to have thoughtful, intellligent Liberals such
>>>>> as Dave Moss, now we have ranting rabid racists like SirVile
>>>>> Johhny Howard and Chris Textor, Christian fundie nutjobs like Petzl
,
>>>>> and slimy sophists like Peter Webb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Menzies is spinning in his grave.
>>>>
>>>> So, you should have no problems finding some "racist"
>>>> quotes of mine then.
>>>
>>> No problem whatsoever.
>>>
>>> # We know islamic monkeys love killing people.
>>> # - Tex aka tropicus http://tinyurl.com/pb786
>>>
>>> That's a classic where you slander a whole group
>>> of people implying they are NOT members of the
>>> human race, but monkeys.. a blatant case of
>>> racism.
>>
>> Islam isn't a 'race' you idiot.
>
> Who mentioned Islam, you ****wit? OH YOU did! B^D
You're the one who said it was "racist" you ****wit. Do try and pay
attention
> I merely pointed out that you slandered 'a whole group
> of people' implying they are NOT members of the
> human race, but monkeys..
Like you with Israelis?
> a blatant case of
> racism.
Well, you do seem to hate people who live in Israel. No wonder you think
wiping them out is a "moderate" idea
>That you link your racism
Islam isn't a "race", you tool
> to their religious
> affiliation is just another example of how extensive
> and diverse you BIGOTRY and HATE is.
You're the one who said wanting to slaughter Israeli Jews is a "moderate"
idea
> We can feel sorry for you, but clearly do nothing to improve
> a mind so sunk in filth and depravity.
You're the one who said wanting to slaughter Israeli Jews is a "moderate"
idea
> So we will mock you instead. B^D
Who is "we"? You and your 'fan club'? Hehehe
> Last time I mocked you, you broke down and confessed to
> being a child molestor:
Nah, I was just quoting your own words
> I'm a happily married paedophile!
Sorry to hear that fagbags. I hope your kids are out of the house.
> a paedophile
You just admitted so.
>
> Of course, being an inveterate liar and intellectual fraud he
> tried to place his admission in someone else's post! 8^o
Awww, poor Poita Wicks throws a spazz when his own text-alteration tactics
are used against him :)
> a child molestor
You keep telling us you are.
>> Not really, considering how often you run away :)
>
> You are in a thread on politics, in a politics NG,
> ignoring all the issues, stamping your little hoof and
> demanding we talk about your racism!
What "racism"? Have you learned Islam isn't a "race"?
> Talk about running away! B^D B^D
OK, let's talk about it: you did it over 250 times in a single post.
Remember? Hehehe
> No one takes your lies and attempted distractions
> seriously.
You lie more than anyone on usenet, poita.
> Except your intellectual equal, Jake. B^D
Even he didn't run away as often as you. He must be smarter than you :)
> Haven't you noticed that apart from occasionally poking
> you with a stick to watch you SQUARK, no one really bothers
> with you!? B^D
Sounds like your fan club. LOL
> You are regarded as a complete lightweight
Says the person who thinks Islam is a "race"
BTW Mr Wicks, I see you avoided this one again:
>> Why do you regard the extermination of Israeli Jews as a "moderate"
idea?
Hmmm....bit awkward for you is it?
|
