On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:44:35 +1000, "Tex" <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
>"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:4828533d$0$30463$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Tex wrote:
>>> "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:48284a89$0$17508$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>>> "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:482839ad$0$13945$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>>>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>>>> PeterN wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 07:43:40 +1000, fasgnadh
<fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Ted Baillieu hunts for Lib traitors"
>>>>>>>>>> 12/5/2008
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A FURIOUS Ted Baillieu has vowed to cleanse the
>>>>>>>>>> Victorian Liberal Party"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I thought the voters were doing that for him!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> " of plotters out to get rid of him.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so it's just a Purge of Liberals who criticise
>>>>>>>>>> Ted as leader.. that could be ANYONE! B^D
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Mr Baillieu said yesterday that "cancerous elements"
>>>>>>>>>> were undermining the party."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure, Brenda Nelson Alex Downer and Ted himself spring to
mind!
>>>>>>>>>> B^D
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a long history of treachery and disunity among the
>>>>>>>>>> Darwinian tory party
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any more cleansing of 'traitors' and 'cancerous elements'
>>>>>>>>>> and there will be NO ONE LEFT!! B^D
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "He accused a "deep-seated cell" of working for the ALP in an
>>>>>>>>> Ted's misguided paranoia
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> extraordinary day that sent shock waves through the beleaguered
>>>>>>>>>> party."
>>>>>>>>>> Naturally the tory rabble blame everyone but themselves.
>>>>>>>>>> If that desperate liar had any EVIDENCE of his slanders we
>>>>>>>>>> would have heard of it by now. B^)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But of course there are many Liberal voters who have given
>>>>>>>>>> up on them and gone across to the ALP, it is hardly any
>>>>>>>>>> surprise if those at the very heart of the organisation,
>>>>>>>>>> frustrated with incompetence and inaction, follow the rest
>>>>>>>>>> of the country and abandon the tory rabble completely.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The simple fact is this: The criticism is coming RIGHT OUT
>>>>>>>>>> OF LIBERAL PARTY HQ! B^D If that's Ted's definition of
the
>>>>>>>>>> ALP then he best lie down in a warm bath and open his
wrists!
>>>>>>>>>> B^p
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Two staff members sacked for posting damaging comments on a
>>>>>>>>>> website blog were not acting alone and more heads would roll,
he
>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Campaign officers Simon Morgan and John Osborn were fired
>>>>>>>>>> following a secret investigation that found they contributed to
>>>>>>>>>> the invitation-only blog hewhostandsfornothing.blogspot.com"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like their criticism was directed at Nelson or
>>>>>>>>>> Costello,
>>>>>>>>>> as much as Ted.. face it, Losers, you have a long
tradition
>>>>>>>>>> of standing for nothing! B^D
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "The website lampooned Mr Baillieu, dismissing him as lazy and
>>>>>>>>>> incompetent."
>>>>>>>>> fasgnadh is someone at the Liebral Party doing your work :)
>>>>>>>> It appears so, and unlike me, they are PAID TO DO IT... B^)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BY THE STUPID ****ING LIBERALS!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How can they run a State, let alone the COUNTRY, when
>>>>>>>> they can't even RUN AN OFFICE!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From today's Age : Liberals' blogs of war, Paul Austin - May 12,
>>>>>>>>> 2008
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Baillieu hits out at 'traitors'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> THE homepage was arresting: "Ted Baillieu must GO," it screamed,
>>>>>>>>> complete with a picture of the Opposition Leader wearing a red
>>>>>>>>> nose.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The name of the blogsite was direct: "He who stands for
nothing."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What was not clear to readers was that people behind the vitriol
>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>> not Labor Party stirrers but paid employees of Mr Baillieu's
party,
>>>>>>>>> who distributed their poison through the computers on their
desks
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> Liberal HQ in Exhibition Street.
>>>>>>>> Hey, how much do the tories pay for such scathing honesty? B^D
>>>>>>>> B^D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The now infamous blog was no impulsive flight of fancy: it was
>>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>>> put up late last year and not pulled down until last month, when
>>>>>>>>> party
>>>>>>>>> director Julian Sheezel discovered who was responsible and
sacked
>>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>> of his most trusted staff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The site did not limit its anonymous spite to Mr Baillieu, whom
it
>>>>>>>>> nicknamed Cottee's — "because he's thick and rich" —
>>>>>>>> That will stick! ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and who was described as a "vile communist"
>>>>>>>> that won't.. it is typical tory commie can kicking,
>>>>>>>> they are blind ideologues stuck in the Class Wars
>>>>>>>> of the 1950s.. thats why they loved Howard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > and a "vacuous moron".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> YOu can't sack a bloke for speaking the truth. ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just about anyone seen to be associated with the moderate
grouping
>>>>>>>>> in the party
>>>>>>>>> was fair game,
>>>>>>>> and that is the vile stink at the heart of what would otherwise
>>>>>>>> just be another inadvertent tory joke, they are vicious
slandering
>>>>>>>> right wing nutjobs, who have pilloried small l liberals and
driven
>>>>>>>> them from the party!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just look at the vile rabble which infests Usenet now...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When we used to have thoughtful, intellligent Liberals such
>>>>>>>> as Dave Moss, now we have ranting rabid racists like SirVile
>>>>>>>> Johhny Howard and Chris Textor, Christian fundie nutjobs like
Petzl
>>>>>>>> , and slimy sophists like Peter Webb.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Menzies is spinning in his grave.
>>>>>>> So, you should have no problems finding some "racist"
>>>>>>> quotes of mine then.
>>>>>> No problem whatsoever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # We know islamic monkeys love killing people.
>>>>>> # - Tex aka tropicus http://tinyurl.com/pb786
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a classic where you slander a whole group
>>>>>> of people implying they are NOT members of the
>>>>>> human race, but monkeys.. a blatant case of
>>>>>> racism.
>> >>>
>>>>> Islam isn't a 'race' you idiot.
>> >>
>>>> Who mentioned Islam, you ****wit? OH YOU did! B^D
>>>
>>> You're the one who said it was "racist"
>>
>> No, you clearly can't read, or comprehend;
>
>I can, but then again, unlike you, I can think
>
>> I said accurately, that you slandered 'a whole group of people'
>> implying they are NOT members of the human race
>
>Kinda like you with the Liberal Party. By your own definition, you are
>"racist"
>
>>, but monkeys..
>> a blatant case of racism.
>
>LOL. You just denied saying my statement was "racist", but now you say it
>was a "a blatant case of racism". You very very confused, to put it
mildly.
>
>
>> The group could be Catholics or
>> Criminals, it matters not to my argument, you denied their
>> member****p of the human race and declared then sub-human,
>> animals, lower primates, "monkeys"
>
>So if they left that group, they'd no longer be part of tht "race" then?
>LOL. Some "race" you've got there.
>
>> That is your racism.
>
>You just denied claiming my statement was racist. Do make up your mind.
>
>Which "race" is Islam then? Must be the only "race" you can decide to
>join/leave.
>
>> Not dependent on your victims gender,
>> or religion, or political opinions, in my view,
>
>But you just said insulting Islam was "racist", so your argument does
seem
>"dependent" on one of those.
>
>> but if you wish to demonstrate another aspect of
>> your small minded bigotry and hatred go right ahead. pfffft!
>
>Speaking of bigotry, why do you think exterminating Israeli Jews is a
>"moderate" goal?
>
>> Your stupidity, inability to follow a simple rational argument,
>
>You've never made a rational argument. In fact, you don't seem even
capable
>of deciding what your argument is.
>
>> and tiresome repetition is boring, and I will leave you to whine
>> impotently that people 'run away' when they can't be bothered
>> with such an inconsequential lightweight. B^)
>
>Never "whined" any such thing. I have however, pointed out your habit of
>shreiking hysterically, lying, snipping text and then running away when
>you've had your arse kicked.
>
>> You can have the last word, because people can see it will be a
>> falsehood.
>
>This coming from someone who has in this very thread altered text and
>avoided questions. Hehehe
>
>> <snip all your forgery of text, Google proves that I reply only
>> to those words of yours I choose to rebut and deride, while you
>> fraudulently misrepresent your words as those of your opponent,
>> when you are losing, as you just did again ;->
>
>Hmm.....it seems you've avoided a certain question again. You seem rather
>afraid to answer it. Very telling :)
>
>Now, when will you apologise for your racism?
>
Tex, you've been well and trully out debated on this one. Crawl back
under your rock and wait for the next rains.
|
