"PeterN" <petern_2004@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:sqfh24h96hq9eakt7fvrstjjarahj4qn43@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:44:35 +1000, "Tex" <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>news:4828533d$0$30463$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Tex wrote:
>>>> "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:48284a89$0$17508$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>>>> "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:482839ad$0$13945$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Tex wrote:
>>>>>>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>>>>> PeterN wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 07:43:40 +1000, fasgnadh
<fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Ted Baillieu hunts for Lib traitors"
>>>>>>>>>>> 12/5/2008
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A FURIOUS Ted Baillieu has vowed to cleanse the
>>>>>>>>>>> Victorian Liberal Party"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I thought the voters were doing that for him!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> " of plotters out to get rid of him.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so it's just a Purge of Liberals who criticise
>>>>>>>>>>> Ted as leader.. that could be ANYONE! B^D
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Mr Baillieu said yesterday that "cancerous elements"
>>>>>>>>>>> were undermining the party."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sure, Brenda Nelson Alex Downer and Ted himself spring to
>>>>>>>>>>> mind!
>>>>>>>>>>> B^D
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is a long history of treachery and disunity among the
>>>>>>>>>>> Darwinian tory party
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Any more cleansing of 'traitors' and 'cancerous elements'
>>>>>>>>>>> and there will be NO ONE LEFT!! B^D
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "He accused a "deep-seated cell" of working for the ALP in an
>>>>>>>>>> Ted's misguided paranoia
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> extraordinary day that sent shock waves through the
beleaguered
>>>>>>>>>>> party."
>>>>>>>>>>> Naturally the tory rabble blame everyone but themselves.
>>>>>>>>>>> If that desperate liar had any EVIDENCE of his slanders we
>>>>>>>>>>> would have heard of it by now. B^)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But of course there are many Liberal voters who have given
>>>>>>>>>>> up on them and gone across to the ALP, it is hardly any
>>>>>>>>>>> surprise if those at the very heart of the organisation,
>>>>>>>>>>> frustrated with incompetence and inaction, follow the rest
>>>>>>>>>>> of the country and abandon the tory rabble completely.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The simple fact is this: The criticism is coming RIGHT OUT
>>>>>>>>>>> OF LIBERAL PARTY HQ! B^D If that's Ted's definition of
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> ALP then he best lie down in a warm bath and open his
>>>>>>>>>>> wrists!
>>>>>>>>>>> B^p
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Two staff members sacked for posting damaging comments on a
>>>>>>>>>>> website blog were not acting alone and more heads would roll,
he
>>>>>>>>>>> said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Campaign officers Simon Morgan and John Osborn were fired
>>>>>>>>>>> following a secret investigation that found they contributed
to
>>>>>>>>>>> the invitation-only blog hewhostandsfornothing.blogspot.com"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like their criticism was directed at Nelson or
>>>>>>>>>>> Costello,
>>>>>>>>>>> as much as Ted.. face it, Losers, you have a long
tradition
>>>>>>>>>>> of standing for nothing! B^D
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "The website lampooned Mr Baillieu, dismissing him as lazy and
>>>>>>>>>>> incompetent."
>>>>>>>>>> fasgnadh is someone at the Liebral Party doing your work :)
>>>>>>>>> It appears so, and unlike me, they are PAID TO DO IT... B^)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BY THE STUPID ****ING LIBERALS!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How can they run a State, let alone the COUNTRY, when
>>>>>>>>> they can't even RUN AN OFFICE!!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From today's Age : Liberals' blogs of war, Paul Austin - May
12,
>>>>>>>>>> 2008
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Baillieu hits out at 'traitors'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> THE homepage was arresting: "Ted Baillieu must GO," it
screamed,
>>>>>>>>>> complete with a picture of the Opposition Leader wearing a red
>>>>>>>>>> nose.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The name of the blogsite was direct: "He who stands for
nothing."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What was not clear to readers was that people behind the
vitriol
>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>> not Labor Party stirrers but paid employees of Mr Baillieu's
>>>>>>>>>> party,
>>>>>>>>>> who distributed their poison through the computers on their
desks
>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> Liberal HQ in Exhibition Street.
>>>>>>>>> Hey, how much do the tories pay for such scathing honesty? B^D
>>>>>>>>> B^D
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The now infamous blog was no impulsive flight of fancy: it was
>>>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>>>> put up late last year and not pulled down until last month,
when
>>>>>>>>>> party
>>>>>>>>>> director Julian Sheezel discovered who was responsible and
sacked
>>>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>>> of his most trusted staff.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The site did not limit its anonymous spite to Mr Baillieu, whom
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> nicknamed Cottee's - "because he's thick and rich" -
>>>>>>>>> That will stick! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and who was described as a "vile communist"
>>>>>>>>> that won't.. it is typical tory commie can kicking,
>>>>>>>>> they are blind ideologues stuck in the Class Wars
>>>>>>>>> of the 1950s.. thats why they loved Howard.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > and a "vacuous moron".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> YOu can't sack a bloke for speaking the truth. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just about anyone seen to be associated with the moderate
>>>>>>>>>> grouping
>>>>>>>>>> in the party
>>>>>>>>>> was fair game,
>>>>>>>>> and that is the vile stink at the heart of what would otherwise
>>>>>>>>> just be another inadvertent tory joke, they are vicious
slandering
>>>>>>>>> right wing nutjobs, who have pilloried small l liberals and
driven
>>>>>>>>> them from the party!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just look at the vile rabble which infests Usenet now...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When we used to have thoughtful, intellligent Liberals such
>>>>>>>>> as Dave Moss, now we have ranting rabid racists like SirVile
>>>>>>>>> Johhny Howard and Chris Textor, Christian fundie nutjobs like
>>>>>>>>> Petzl
>>>>>>>>> , and slimy sophists like Peter Webb.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Menzies is spinning in his grave.
>>>>>>>> So, you should have no problems finding some "racist"
>>>>>>>> quotes of mine then.
>>>>>>> No problem whatsoever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # We know islamic monkeys love killing people.
>>>>>>> # - Tex aka tropicus http://tinyurl.com/pb786
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a classic where you slander a whole group
>>>>>>> of people implying they are NOT members of the
>>>>>>> human race, but monkeys.. a blatant case of
>>>>>>> racism.
>>> >>>
>>>>>> Islam isn't a 'race' you idiot.
>>> >>
>>>>> Who mentioned Islam, you ****wit? OH YOU did! B^D
>>>>
>>>> You're the one who said it was "racist"
>>>
>>> No, you clearly can't read, or comprehend;
>>
>>I can, but then again, unlike you, I can think
>>
>>> I said accurately, that you slandered 'a whole group of people'
>>> implying they are NOT members of the human race
>>
>>Kinda like you with the Liberal Party. By your own definition, you are
>>"racist"
>>
>>>, but monkeys..
>>> a blatant case of racism.
>>
>>LOL. You just denied saying my statement was "racist", but now you say
it
>>was a "a blatant case of racism". You very very confused, to put it
>>mildly.
>>
>>
>>> The group could be Catholics or
>>> Criminals, it matters not to my argument, you denied their
>>> member****p of the human race and declared then sub-human,
>>> animals, lower primates, "monkeys"
>>
>>So if they left that group, they'd no longer be part of tht "race" then?
>>LOL. Some "race" you've got there.
>>
>>> That is your racism.
>>
>>You just denied claiming my statement was racist. Do make up your mind.
>>
>>Which "race" is Islam then? Must be the only "race" you can decide to
>>join/leave.
>>
>>> Not dependent on your victims gender,
>>> or religion, or political opinions, in my view,
>>
>>But you just said insulting Islam was "racist", so your argument does
seem
>>"dependent" on one of those.
>>
>>> but if you wish to demonstrate another aspect of
>>> your small minded bigotry and hatred go right ahead. pfffft!
>>
>>Speaking of bigotry, why do you think exterminating Israeli Jews is a
>>"moderate" goal?
>>
>>> Your stupidity, inability to follow a simple rational argument,
>>
>>You've never made a rational argument. In fact, you don't seem even
>>capable
>>of deciding what your argument is.
>>
>>> and tiresome repetition is boring, and I will leave you to whine
>>> impotently that people 'run away' when they can't be bothered
>>> with such an inconsequential lightweight. B^)
>>
>>Never "whined" any such thing. I have however, pointed out your habit of
>>shreiking hysterically, lying, snipping text and then running away when
>>you've had your arse kicked.
>>
>>> You can have the last word, because people can see it will be a
>>> falsehood.
>>
>>This coming from someone who has in this very thread altered text and
>>avoided questions. Hehehe
>>
>>> <snip all your forgery of text, Google proves that I reply only
>>> to those words of yours I choose to rebut and deride, while you
>>> fraudulently misrepresent your words as those of your opponent,
>>> when you are losing, as you just did again ;->
>>
>>Hmm.....it seems you've avoided a certain question again. You seem
rather
>>afraid to answer it. Very telling :)
>>
>>Now, when will you apologise for your racism?
>>
>
> Tex, you've been well and trully out debated on this one. Crawl back
> under your rock and wait for the next rains.
Just as soon as someone can work out what "race" Islam is.............
|
