In article <i3Lzf.2735$vU2.1974@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Istlota
says...
>By the end of W.'s reign, more Americans will have died "fighting
terrorism"
>than died in Ground Zero. What will all these deaths have gained us?
By the end of FDR's "reign", more Americans died "fighting fascism" than
died at
Pearl Harbor. What did all of those deaths gain us?
>Ground Zero was a horrific incident, but it was the sort of thing which
>could have been prevented. It wasn't like a number of people didn't warn
Ground Zero wasn't an "incident", any more than the murder of Medgar Evers
by
Byron de la Beckwith was an "incident". It was a deliberate act of
murder.
>this adminstration, no, make that begged this administration, to do
>something about what was about to happen. The fact the threat was
ignored,
People warned the Clinton administration. The result? Crickets.
>and that the same administration who allowed the terrorists to slip in is
>now pretending to protect us from the terrorist threat, is a testament
unto
>the gullibility of frightened people to follow anyone claiming to be
their
>saviour.
They seem to be doing a good job. We didn't win WWII by trying to create
an
airtight defense against German bombers. We did it by bombing and
invading
Germany. Have you ever seen a boxer win a match by just covering up for
ten
rounds?
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with
210lb.
rapists.
|
