Re: Our Lapdog Congress

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Chris Morton wrote:

> In article <20060119121518.A85897@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, xeno says...

>>Even if it couldn't have been, the US attack on Iraq is far more
horrific
>>& ****ed up.

> Well, certainly if you miss Saddam, Uday and Qusay...

It doesn't make any difference whether you miss Saddam or not. You can't
save the village by burning it. Burning the village is just a means to a
****ed up end with the pretense of saving it. For whom are you saving it
for? The people you blithefully kill? Or is it for the people who want to
exploit what the village rests on & for the strategic position the village
is located at? The last two are the obvious & evidentary reasons for all
of this. Who do you think you're kidding?  Are you kidding yourself as
well?