In article <h405t1l4smmk9ktvrdjobo9jnhskf45ugj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, trudogg says...
>..not even in the same ballpark as the situation we have now. We
>can't win in Iraq. All we can hope to do is spend obscene amounts of
Joe Kennedy said we couldn't win in WWII.
>money and pray that the terrorists don't strike over here again. There
I'm an agnostic. I prefer to kill them. You pray if you like.
>is no way you can make this one right. With the next strike by
>terrorists in the US, all the American's dead, Iraqi's dead, money
>spent and time wasted will have been for nothing. And all of Bush's
If we hadn't invaded Iraq, would you feel better about a terrorist attack?
>lies will come home to roost. I honestly don't want another
No lies... unless they're also Clinton, Chiracq and Schroeder's lies as
well.
>catastrophe like we had on 9-11, which by the way was on your boy's
>watch...no one else's...but it's inevitable and I welcome the chance
>to show up Bush for the fraud he is. I just hope there aren't too many
>more lives lost in the process...
The first WTC bombing was on Jethro's watch. That seems not to bother
you...
nor his milquetoast reaction to an entire SERIES of attacks, domestic and
foreign. Bin Laden and company drew the appropriate conclusions...
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with
210lb.
rapists.
|
