In article <unfat11s9g5cea8v1g7k0pj91tvcvqffj1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, trudogg says...
>..we're fighting the wrong fight? What's not answered? We have gone
The question which I asked you, which you did not quote.
>into what is essentially a para-military situation with full bore
>troops and equipment. Our enemy is small and very light on their feet,
>we are larger and more ponderous in our maneuverings. They are
>****table, we are static. I am not a military expert, but this
>administration has not been paying complete attention to the advisors
>they have.
I'm sure that if we just used random carbombs, we could be "light on our
feet"
as well.
Not only aren't we "static" we can move mostly anywhere we want, when we
want.
Our ONLY deficit is our unwillingness to slaughter civilians in the way in
which
they do. I can live with that. We had the same problem in Manila in
1945. We
worked through it.
>>If somebody says, "Clinton was flying drugs into Arkansas." and you
reply, "What
>>kind of aircraft were being used?", "Clinton's a crook!" isn't a
meaningful
>>response...
>
>..it wouldn't surprise me to learn that Bubba was flying ***** in and
>out of Arkansas.
Which of course is not a crime, unless it's 13 year old *****. But again,
the
point is that changing the subject doesn't make your point.
>>I didn't say you were lying. I AM saying that you're arguing from pure
>>assertion and haven't provided any sup****ting evidence. That isn't any
more
>>convincing when you do it than when "intelligent design" advocates do
it.
>
>..are you sup****ting Bubba or not? Personally I didn't care for the
>way he thought he could get away with anything just because he had the
>office. Bush is the same way, only no where near as smart.
I'm saying that if so MANY people of responsibility appear to have thought
the
same thing, it can't be dismissed out of hand. My problem with Clinton
isn't
his beliefs regarding the capabilities of Saddam, it's his general inertia
when
it came to taking necessary action.
>>I can't stop you from heading down that path. I however, owe it to you
to note
>>that it's a dead end with a deep pit at the end. I suppose that this is
more
>>comforting than facing the real electoral deficits of the Democratic
Party. But
>>it's nothing more than an illusion. It's the political equivalent of
JFK Jr.'s
>>last flight. You literally don't know which end is up, and the water's
really
>>close.
>
>..it isn't just me that is "going down that path". There were
I didn't say you were alone. Lemmings aren't alone either...
If you think that Bush is going to get impeached, you might as well just
kick
back and watch "Friends" reruns. You won't accomplish any LESS.
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with
210lb.
rapists.
|
