On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:21:25 CST, Chris Morton <cmorton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>..they may be ****ing bricks, but it isn't going to stop them from
>>planning and executing more attacks in he US. Which is what all of
>>this BS is supposed to be about.
>
>So then why HAVEN'T they?
>
>What have they been doing instead? Getting stoned, eating Cheetos and
watching
>"Punked"?
...how long a period of time was there between the first attack on the
WTC and the second?
>I'm thinking it's all they can do to merely stay alive.
...all they would have to do is leave the area. I doubt that our
intel services could find them, they haven't yet with how many
thousands of men looking?
>>..where? Point to their bases. Sorry, but this is more BS. We can't
>>find them, but they can find us. Think before you type...
>
>I just DID. I also pointedly noted that we blew them out of them with
high
>explosives.
...ahhh, so they must all be dead and these further attacks are just
figments of the news stations fevered imaginations?
>>..then maybe we should invade Saudi Arabia as well.
>
>Point well taken.
>
>I'm tentatively penciling them in for right after Iran.
...you really want to leave this country open to attack? We can't
even sustain what is going on in Iraq, how in the world can you
imagine we could take on Iran? You need to share some of that stuff
you've been tokin' on...bogarting is not polite.
>Iran wants to take US on. The Iranians want to commit NATIONAL suicide.
>
>Let's see, apparently a guy who claims the Holocaust never happened,
wants to
>destroy Israel, and who's trying to get nuclear weapons doesn't worry
you.
>
>If this guy gets nuclear weapons, he's going to use them because he
"knows" that
>his imaginary friend will protect him... and if not, he's got 72 virgin
sheep
>waiting for him.
...we don't have to mess with him. We don't have to mess with his
army. Worst case scenario is we bomb wherever they set up their
nuclear shop, best case is we just let Israel handle it. We've kept
them muzzled for far too long and taken the heat for their problems.
So we let the doggs out and back off...
>>..I don't know how you can pretend to be well informed and not see
>>that the whole country, both parties, are becoming less and less
>>enamored of Bush and his bu**** every day. He has not accomplished a
>
>Because it isn't true. But hey, even though that stuff didn't work for
the
>Republicans, it might work for you...
...read the polls.
>>thing beyond that which wasn't needed in the first place. All his
>>bogus plans and political capital were lies. He sold the country a ton
>>of fear and they found he has nothing else to offer.
>
>Hey, if that makes you feel better, so be it. I'm thinking you'll end up
>feeling just as bewildered in the end as you did the morning after the
last
>presidential election. At that point, you've got nobody to blame but
yourself.
...bewildered, no. Disgusted, yes. To paraphrase Ben Franklin, people
that are willing to sell their souls and ignore common sense for a
little tem****ary (and imaginary) safety...don't deserve it.
|
