In article <dgpct1teii2i0orp5do7lv0bql0ilgnve6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, trudogg says...
>..how long a period of time was there between the first attack on the
>WTC and the second?
How many of them did we kill during that period?
Was it necessary for them to hide in caves during that period?
>..all they would have to do is leave the area. I doubt that our
>intel services could find them, they haven't yet with how many
>thousands of men looking?
Not being found isn't a threat to us.
Lt. Onoda Hiroo stayed hidden in the Filippines for HOW many years?
Precisely
what threat did he present to the United States.
And in fact, as time goes by, bin Laden takes on the character of a
bypassed
Japanese soldier wearing rags and eating monkies.
>>>..where? Point to their bases. Sorry, but this is more BS. We can't
>>>find them, but they can find us. Think before you type...
>>
>>I just DID. I also pointedly noted that we blew them out of them with
high
>>explosives.
>
>..ahhh, so they must all be dead and these further attacks are just
>figments of the news stations fevered imaginations?
You're changing the subject again. MANY of them are dead. MUCH of their
LEADER****P is dead. And once again, how many attacks have they launched
HERE?
>>>..then maybe we should invade Saudi Arabia as well.
>>
>>Point well taken.
>>
>>I'm tentatively penciling them in for right after Iran.
>
>..you really want to leave this country open to attack? We can't
>even sustain what is going on in Iraq, how in the world can you
>imagine we could take on Iran? You need to share some of that stuff
>you've been tokin' on...bogarting is not polite.
Now let's see, you're afraid of a bunch of guys eating rats in a cave, but
you're NOT afraid of a certifiable lunatic who sounds like David Duke, and
is
REALISTICALLY likely to get nuclear weapons.
What exactly do you think is going to happen if Ahmadinewhackjob actually
GETS
nuclear weapons? The difference between him and Kim Jong Il is the
difference
between Hitler and Stalin. Kim's an atheist who knows that if he dies in
a
mushroom cloud, that's the end of the story. Whackjob believes that his
imaginary friend will bail him out at the last minute, or at worst, he
ends up
with 72 virgins. Like Hitler, if he gets nuclear weapons, he'll USE them.
>..we don't have to mess with him. We don't have to mess with his
>army. Worst case scenario is we bomb wherever they set up their
>nuclear shop, best case is we just let Israel handle it. We've kept
>them muzzled for far too long and taken the heat for their problems.
Where IS his "nuclear shop"? Nobody seems to know for sure. This is THE
strategic challenge of the day, but you seem to just brush it aside.
EVERYBODY
from Bush to Hillary Clinton knows that there are only bad and worse
choices in
this matter, and almost entirely because of the Iranians.
>So we let the doggs out and back off...
How will you "back off" when gas is $20/gal? That may be unavoidable, but
that
hardly makes it and the fundamental situation something to be dismissed.
>>Because it isn't true. But hey, even though that stuff didn't work for
the
>>Republicans, it might work for you...
>
>..read the polls.
Polls go up and down. NONE of them sup****ts anything like Bush's removal
from
office. That won't happen until there's a new president, be it Condi or
Hillary.
>>Hey, if that makes you feel better, so be it. I'm thinking you'll end
up
>>feeling just as bewildered in the end as you did the morning after the
last
>>presidential election. At that point, you've got nobody to blame but
yourself.
>
>..bewildered, no. Disgusted, yes. To paraphrase Ben Franklin, people
>that are willing to sell their souls and ignore common sense for a
>little tem****ary (and imaginary) safety...don't deserve it.
Disgusted and impotent. The worst person to fool is always yourself.
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with
210lb.
rapists.
|
