On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:45:31 CST, Chris Morton <cmorton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>..how long a period of time was there between the first attack on the
>>WTC and the second?
>
>How many of them did we kill during that period?
>
>Was it necessary for them to hide in caves during that period?
...hell, they aren't living primarily in caves now. They're using our
forces as training guides and our screwups as recruitment posters.
They couldn't have it much better...
>>..all they would have to do is leave the area. I doubt that our
>>intel services could find them, they haven't yet with how many
>>thousands of men looking?
>
>Not being found isn't a threat to us.
>
>Lt. Onoda Hiroo stayed hidden in the Filippines for HOW many years?
Precisely
>what threat did he present to the United States.
>
>And in fact, as time goes by, bin Laden takes on the character of a
bypassed
>Japanese soldier wearing rags and eating monkies.
...don't kid yourself. I'm not sure why you take these little trips
back to the Japanese Army and WWII when it isn't even close to
applicable. But if it makes you happy...
>>..ahhh, so they must all be dead and these further attacks are just
>>figments of the news stations fevered imaginations?
>
>You're changing the subject again. MANY of them are dead. MUCH of their
>LEADER****P is dead. And once again, how many attacks have they launched
HERE?
...I'm changing no subject. Isn't our goal to rid ourselves (and the
world as well) of these Islamic Extremist Idiots? You conveniently
seem to forget that there are other actions/bombings going on in
different parts of the world while the Iraq abortion is going on. What
are you going to say when they finally do attack here? What do you
think shrubya is going to say? Oooops? It's about all he has left...
>>..you really want to leave this country open to attack? We can't
>>even sustain what is going on in Iraq, how in the world can you
>>imagine we could take on Iran? You need to share some of that stuff
>>you've been tokin' on...bogarting is not polite.
>
>Now let's see, you're afraid of a bunch of guys eating rats in a cave,
but
>you're NOT afraid of a certifiable lunatic who sounds like David Duke,
and is
>REALISTICALLY likely to get nuclear weapons.
...as with Iraq, we are not the police of the world. We have never
been about "preventative" invasions to stem some "supposed" threat.
Worldwide we are coming across as the real terrorists, we are becoming
the ones to fear...it isn't what this country has been about. It is
the wet dreams of ne-con idiots that want to play masters of the
universe. It will make us no safer...in fact it will aim more
destruction at us.
>What exactly do you think is going to happen if Ahmadinewhackjob actually
GETS
>nuclear weapons? The difference between him and Kim Jong Il is the
difference
>between Hitler and Stalin. Kim's an atheist who knows that if he dies in
a
>mushroom cloud, that's the end of the story. Whackjob believes that his
>imaginary friend will bail him out at the last minute, or at worst, he
ends up
>with 72 virgins. Like Hitler, if he gets nuclear weapons, he'll USE
them.
...if the threat became that apparent and real, we have the ability to
turn Iran, Iraq, Turkey, North Korea and anyone else into glass
ashtrays. The reason we beat out the USSR is we outspent them, drove
them into bankruptcy...and never took them head on. Bushandco is
wasting our troops, money and time on a fight we can't win decisively
and does very little to insure our homeland security.
>Where IS his "nuclear shop"? Nobody seems to know for sure. This is THE
>strategic challenge of the day, but you seem to just brush it aside.
EVERYBODY
>from Bush to Hillary Clinton knows that there are only bad and worse
choices in
>this matter, and almost entirely because of the Iranians.
...we know and I'll bet the rent the Israelis have it in the
crosshairs right now.
>How will you "back off" when gas is $20/gal? That may be unavoidable,
but that
>hardly makes it and the fundamental situation something to be dismissed.
...now you're changing the subject. If you take on Iran, you will have
a spike in gas prices that will make this last look like a sunday
school picnic tax...
>>..read the polls.
>
>Polls go up and down. NONE of them sup****ts anything like Bush's removal
from
>office. That won't happen until there's a new president, be it Condi or
>Hillary.
...his polls have been going mostly down. And you can bet the rent
that the next prez will not be either of the two you just named. Dr.
Rice will never get past the lies she's had to repeat (albeit
willingly) for this corrupt administration. Billary is an
op****tunistic piece of work that will endure any slight, any
degradation to gain office. People aren't going to elect either of
them.
>Disgusted and impotent. The worst person to fool is always yourself.
...disgusted only. To be truly impotent, I would have voted for these
frauds. I would have allowed their lies and pathetic fear-mongering to
take away my common sense. It would mean that I didn't have the
ability to see what has infected the White House with a cancer that is
poisoning our government.
|
