On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:03:06 CST, Chris Morton <cmorton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>It's EXACTLY the same thing. It's appearing in a profoundly hostile
venue, with
>no conceiveable positive return.
...not even close. You're comparing the fruitcakes and wingnutz of the
NRA to the people assembled to remember Mrs. King? Gimme a freaking
break...
>As for the NRA, "fear and paranoia" of WHAT? Gun bans, like those in
Chicago
>and San Francisco? Or warrantless searches in public housing? How about
>illegal gun confiscations in New Orleans?
...considering how many guns fall into the hands of kids and street
punks, maybe we need more "warrantless searches" and "illegal gun
confiscations"...hell, that would be right up Bush's alley...he seems
to have no problem violating the constitution. Tell me why the average
citizen has a need for a 50 caliber hunting rifle? Or an Uzi, Ak-47,
AR-15...etc. The right to bear arms does not include the right to be
better armed than the armed services or police. It does not include
the right to have any weapon you choose just because you want it for
"target or s****t" shooting. This **** has gotten out of hand, trying
to appease the whackos in the NRA has about run it's course. If they
can't adjust their arguments to fit reasonable parameters, they will
fade like the Klan.
>>I don't like Moore or Duke either and Bush is close to both of them in
>>different ways. Although he isn't as smart as Moore, he does have many
>>of the same sup****ters that Duke does.
>
>Moore isn't smart at all. He's just a good con man. If you look at his
record,
>he's done and said some pretty stupid things. And ALL of the Duke
sup****ters I
>see in usenet and elsewhere hate Bush's guts. I think it has something
to do
>with having two Black Secretaries of State and not gassing all of the
Mexicans.
>I could be wrong...
...I'm not going to defend either of them, but Bush isn't as smart as
Moore...so if you say Moore isn't smart at all, where does it leave
your boy?
|
