trudogg wrote:
> On 8 Feb 2006 20:20:02 GMT, "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> >> ..why do the people need them?
>
> > People's possession of .50 caliuber hunting rifles, Uzis, ak-47's,
> >and AR-15's violate no rights.
>
> ..that doesn't answer the question. Why do people need these weapons?
Some of them may need those weapons for the same reason the United
States Marine Corps needs those kinds of weapons.
In any event, their possession of the weapons do not violate
anyone's rights.
>
> > Police robbing other people of .50 caliuber hunting rifles, Uzis,
> >ak-47's, and AR-15's violates the owner's private property rights.
>
> ..police robbing? Or legal confiscation of illegally held firearms?
Using force to take private property without a court order
constitutes robbery. Why should police be above the law?
Does David Duke have the inherent right to forcibly take an AR-15
from a black man?
Michael
|
