In article <20060221205429.H15402@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, xeno says...
>By whom it should be bought & paid for is not the pertinent issue; why &
>for what purpose is.
One follows from the other. Presumably, if it's "bad" for one, it's good
for
another... unless you say so.
>> Who can we depend upon to "save" us? Should they use violence to do
so?
>
>The lone wolf with a fancy popgun is not about saving the community. The
>only way to do that effectively is through a milita or an army.
No one will be saved by being a victim, nor by a fallacious belief in
"protection" by the police or a "militia".
Feel free to tell everyone what duty the police have to protect you,
absent a
"special relation****p". Interestingly, entire books have been written on
the
subject.
Of course too, if you read the link to the Cleveland Scene article that I
posted, you might not WANT to be "saved" by the cop referenced therein...
>Ever the wishful thinking chauvinist.
Ever the realist. But then not building your enemies... and everyone
else, up
ten feet tall is part of being a realist.
--
--
Gun control, the theory that 110lb. women should have to fistfight with
210lb.
rapists.
|
