On Mar 24, 8:55=A0pm, David Hartung <d_hart...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> When Clinton's actions impact what is happening today, it is proper to
> point this out. Since Bush's service was honorable, as was McCain's you
> are beating a dead horse. beat on if you wish.
Dave, Dave, do you even read or understand what you write as a
republibot?
"in less than 12 months George W Bush will step down as President, why
is
his military service still a political issue?"
This is what you wrote. You implied that his record should not be
discussed because he will be gone in 12 months, not because his
service was "honorable." No you change it to the honorable point. It
could be beating a dead horse but your trying to spin one.
Now please respond with a new reason why it shouldn't be mentioned on
the fith aniversary of the war as the casualty count p***** 4,000.
Only crazy people bring up things related to major events on thier
anniversary.
topset72
|
