Re: Bush vetoed a bill banning water boarding...

Mitchell Holman <Noemail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:Xns9A864C955FCCEta2eene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Felix D." <#1Chekist@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> news:L6WdneoPP5GrQ5fVnZ2dnUVZ_oimnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
> 
>> 
>> "Hugh" <hugh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:8cGdnayq-rkbU5fVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>_ G O D _ wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bush vetoed a bill banning "water boarding" - a method of torture
>>>> during 
>>>
>>> Well, there is certainly nothing wrong with that.
>> 
>> Considering it was only applied to three guys (and three pretty bad
guys
>> at that), the libs have nothing to squawk about. 
> 
> 
> 
> "Iraq is free of rape rooms and torture chambers."
> President Bush, October 8, 2003, prior to insisting
> the US has a right to torture anyone it wished to.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 

And your point is what? That you cannot discern between extremely
aggressive 
interogations of individuals who have committed horrendous crimes and who 
have information that may prevent even greater crimes against US citizens
and 
the wholesale use of rape and torture as a method of surpressing dissent, 
puni****ng anyone who may or not have said or done something against the
party 
line and instilling fear in the population? All done with full approval of

the government as a matter of policy?

And you want to be taken seriously? Would you prefer that Saddam's
henchmen 
were still today raping wives and daughters in front of their husbands and

fathers as a matter of state policy?

Frank