On May 2, 11:17=A0am, Drooler <perryneh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> As for Walters, even in her so-called prime her face and lisp were a
> turn-off and she was never worth a tenth of the money "they" paid
> her. =A0But then we don't how much of her salary was based on
> masticatory merit, do we? Some say she talkths that way becauth of the
> rethsults of wremoval of a malignant tumor under her tongue ... too
> many, eh ... eh ... y'know ... ?
And she's crying about not being taken seriously, when every year she
has a list of the most influencial people and none are scientists,
inventors just Hollywood performers and singers. I can see why the
old guard thought she fluffy! She might be the genesis of the problem
where American news is all about Hollywood and nothing else.
|
