by PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
May 10, 2008 at 06:41 PM
On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:08:54 -0700 (PDT), Fellatia
<lilhornie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>"Scramble for Africa "
>
>
>
>The United States is well along on its way to establi****ng a firmer
>foothold in AFRICA. The recent establishment of the Defense
>Department's African Command (AFRICOM) is bringing U.S. foreign
>miltary sales to every 'frican nation's door. Even Zimbabwe, as long
>as it has the cash.
AFRICOM is more to identify and mislabel muslims as islamofascists and
others as anti-black genocide terrorists so that the US can use its
military to interfere in African nations. The US strategy is to
destabilize African governments. She can then force them into an
unwanted and unequal dependency on US arms to stay in power. Of
course the African nation will be obliged to pay for this occupation
by having their resources hijacked by US cor****ations. At the same
time non US investors will be kept out by the manufactured
instability.
Only one or two insignificant and geostrategically unsuitable (dirt
poor) African countries have agreed to host AFRICOM (the US rejected
them). The other Africans know what will happen to them the moment
they let the Americans in. Not even their opposition parties had gone
to the extents of calling for American help. I do recall reading
somewhere that Nigeria may have suc***ed a little to US pressure. So
far AFRICOM isn't getting much traction among African countries. I
think this is where AFRICOM may unwittingly help Chinese, Indian and
South African interests penetrate faster as they are the best
alternative to American pressure. The EU and Japan are hampered by
their current policy not to appear in disagreement with US policy.
On this note it is no surprise that the Myanamar regime refuses to
have anything to do with American government aid. It is telling that
no other country is suggesting that Myanmar is wrong in doing so (the
rejection.) The complaints are that there is too much red tape and
delay in approving aid from International Agencies.
>
>But the real benefit of African engagement lies in its almost
>unlimited supply of human slaves for use by the West. Face it --
>there are many advantages to being African, but minumum wages are not
>among 'em.
>
>Give our regards to Mugabe, will ya?
Mugabe is way past his best by date and must go. But let the
Zimbabwians do it their way without outside interference. The change
if it happens may not be everything they want. But it will be what
they get by their own effort and can live with. Change for the better
will arise from that. That change must not create a wider gulf
between the many tribes in Zimbabwe.
