Nė artikullin: 1191939901.165919.177320@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<ariskratos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> shkroi:
> Burime ne Internet mbi Fallsifikimin e Historisė sė Evropės
E ē'do tė thotė postuesi i nderuar me kėtė postim tė pėrbėrė nga disa
tekste
me pėrkthime tė karakterit tė diskutueshėm? Se historia e Evropės ėshtė
falsifikuar? Nė ē'mėnyrė, mė saktėsisht, dhe me ēfarė pasojash mė
konkretisht?
S
>
> Te
> http://www.egodeath.com/newchronology.htm#_Toc101541541J
> lexojmė kėto rradhė:
> Jean Hardouin (1646-1729)
> http://www.google.com/search?q="Jean+Hardouin"/
> http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hardouin.html
- Jean Hardouin
> (1646-1729) was a scholar of classical literature. In 1685 he
> published an edition of Pliny's Natural History. There was nothing
> unusual about the edition itself, which was considered to be of merit
> and very well edited. What was unusual was that despite being so
> knowledgeable about classical literature, Hardouin had very strange
> ideas about its origins. // According to Hardouin, the majority of
> classical Greek and Roman literature had not been produced by Greek
> and Roman authors. Instead, it had been forged during the Middle Ages
> by a group of Benedictine monks. He also argued that all extant Greek
> and Roman coins were forgeries. He never revealed why such a vast
> deception had occurred. He only declared, elliptically, that when he
> died the reason would be found written on a piece of paper the size of
> his hand. The reason, unfortunately, was never found."
> Po e pėrkthejmė kėtė paragraf:
> Zhan Harduin (1646 - 1729) ishte njė dijetar i letėrsisė klasike. Mė
> 1685 ai botoi Historinė Natyrore tė Plinit. Nė kėtė botim s'kishte
> asgjė tė pazakontė, dhe u konsiderua njė meritė e tij dhe njė botim
> shumė i mirė. Ajo qė ėshtė e pazakontė ishte se megjithėse se ai ishte
> njė njohės shumė i mirė i letėrsiė klasike, Harduin kishte ide tė
> ēuditshme rreth origjinės sė tyre. Sipas Harduin-it, pjesa dėrrmuese e
> literaturės greke dhe romake nuk ishte krijuar nga vetė autorėt grekė
> dhe romakė. Pėrkundrazi, ajo eshtė fallsifikuar gjatė Mesjetės nga njė
> grup murgjish benediktinė. Ai gjithashtu kėmbėngulte se shumica e
> monedhave greke dhe romake i****n mon,edha tė fallsifikuara. Ai nuk
> tregoi kurrė arsyen e njė mashtrimi tė tillė kaq tė madh. Ai vetėm ka
> deklaruar, nė mėnyrė eliptike, se kur tė vdiste arsyeja do tė gjendej
> nė njė copė letėr nė dorėn e tij. Arsyeja, fatkeqėsisht, nuk u zbulua
> kurrė."
>
>
> Te
> http://www.egodeath.com/newchronology.htm#_Toc101541541J
> lexojmė kėto rradhė tė tjera:
> Edwin Johnson
> Edwin Johnson's 1894 book "The Pauline Epistles: Re-studied and
> Explained"
> Study Version of Edwin Johnson's "The Pauline Epistles - Re-Studied
> and Explained", 1894 -- Reformatted version for increased
> comprehensibility. Proposes that the years 700-1400 didn't exist, and
> that Christianity, the "early" Christian texts, Paul, the Gospels, the
> Church Fathers, the Dark Ages, and the Middle Ages were literary
> inventions fabricated in competing monasteries around 1500. Proposes
> that several centuries before the printing press didn't exist. Uses
> the questioning of the historicity of all of Paul's epistles as an
> example to call into doubt the reality and existence of all of
> European history prior to 1533.
>
> Pėrkthejmė
>
> Edvin Xhonson
>
> Libri i Edvin Xhonson i vitit 1894 "Letrat e Paulit: tė ristudiuara e
> me shpjegime" - Njė version i riformatuar pėr t'u kuptuar mė mirė. Aty
> propozohet qė vitet 700 - 1400 nuk kanė ekzistuar, dhe se tekstet e
> "Krishtėrimit", tekstet e hershme tė krishtera, letrat e Paulit,
> Mesharėt, Etėrit e Kishės, Shekujt e Errėt, dhe Mesjeta janė trillime
> letrare tė fabrikuara mes monasteresh nė garė mes tyre aty rreth
> viteve 1500. Aty propozohet se disa shekuj para se tė dalė
> shtypshkronja nuk kanė ekzistuar. Vihet nė dy****m vėrtetėsia e tė
> gjitha letrave Pauline si shembull pėr tė hedhur dy****m mbi realitetin
> dhe ekzistencėn e tė gjithė historisė evropiane para vitit 1533.
>
> Te
> http://www.egodeath.com/newchronology.htm
> lexojmė
> Johnson doesn't provide an effective summary of what exactly he is
> proposing. I won't know until my third thorough reading and
> summarization of Johnson, but it seems that he's saying -- at the
> extreme -- that the entire corpus of ancient Greek, Roman, Jewish, and
> Christian writings was written in the monasteries around 1550 -- or
> something like that but more moderate.
>
> (Edvin) Xhonson nuk bėn ndonjė pėrmbledhje tė asaj se ēfarė kėrkon tė
> propozojė saktėsisht. Unė nuk do ta zbuloj pa e mbaruar leximin tim tė
> tretė dhe tė kem bėrė pėrmbledhjen e Xhonsonit, **** mė duket se ai don
> tė thotė se - nė fund tė fundit - se i TĖRĖ KORPUSI i SHKRIMEVE GREKE,
> ROMAKE, CIFUTE dhe KRISHTERE Ėshtė shkruar nė manastire rreth vitit
> 1550 - ose diēka tė tillė, **** me ton mė tė zbutur.
|
