On May 11, 10:04 am, fanabba <fana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 8, 6:46 pm, Romanise <josh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On May 8, 1:39 pm, fanabba <fana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Why was Satanic Verses by Rushdie banned in India?
> > > How about Muhammad cartoons?
>
> > Why not catch the judges? Hab**** very likely is neither a Hindu nor an
> > Indiam.
>
> > MFH if wanted would have been welcome by USA (not to speak of Canada)
> > with open arms. He loved and loves India and Mumbai.
>
> > It was people like you deserting India but still rooting goons of
> > ****vsena and like that have put the fellow to live in middle east at
> > 90+ age.
>
> > What can be more shameful for India, cutting hands of Bihari migrant
> > workers?
>
> Why can MFH not paint **** pictures of Allah, Muhammad, Ayesha and
> Fatima?
No one is obliged to paint what he doesn't feel like painting. A
better question might be why MFH doesn't address the public and prize
selection committees, informing them of his opinion that painters who
do want to paint such ****s must be free to paint and exhibit them,
that prize selection committees must view those painters in the same
light that they viewed him when they considered him as a candidate for
the award he received, and that he will be most delighted to see such
painters receive the same accolades that he received.
|
