On May 11, 10:22=A0pm, "M. Ranjit Mathews" <ranjit_math...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On May 11, 10:04 am, fanabba <fana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 8, 6:46 pm, Romanise <josh...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On May 8, 1:39 pm, fanabba <fana...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Why was Satanic Verses by Rushdie banned in India?
> > > > How about Muhammad cartoons?
>
> > > Why not catch the judges? Hab**** very likely is neither a Hindu nor
an=
> > > Indiam.
>
> > > MFH if wanted would have been welcome by USA (not to speak of
Canada)
> > > with open arms. He loved and loves India and Mumbai.
>
> > > It was people like you deserting India but still rooting goons of
> > > ****vsena and like that have put the fellow to live in middle east at
> > > 90+ age.
>
> > > What can be more shameful for India, cutting hands of Bihari migrant
> > > workers?
>
> > Why can MFH not =A0paint **** pictures of Allah, Muhammad, Ayesha and
> > Fatima?
>
> No one is obliged to paint what he doesn't feel like painting. A
> better question might be why MFH doesn't address the public and prize
> selection committees, informing them of his opinion that painters who
> do want to paint such ****s must be free to paint and exhibit them,
> that prize selection committees must view those painters in the same
> light that they viewed him when they considered him as a candidate for
> the award he received, and that he will be most delighted to see such
> painters receive the same accolades that he received.- Hide quoted text
-
>
> - Show quoted text -
Following your argument, no one can be oblliged to address
the public and prize selection committees if he does not want to.
|
