Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Asian American > Re: Beijing 'to...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 46 Topic 9252 of 9491
Post > Topic >>

Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'

by Raymond <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 29, 2008 at 10:13 AM

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:04:15 +0200, "Jakub A. Krzewicki"
<ebredel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>niedziela, 27 kwietnia 2008 14:44. carbon entity 'Raymond'
<niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following letter:
>
>> That's why you shouldn't. Lamaism is Buddhism in name, but Bon in
>> practice. It's the most evil cult religion. It's the practice of Devil
>> in the real world. The most evil European cult that ever existed in
>> history would pale in comparison with Lamaism.
>
>Firstly: If you don't think that schools like Ningma, Kagyu, Gelug and so
on
>are the true Vajrayana today, which modern schools are the real Diamond
>Way? 

I don't care. Buddhism does not practice ritual sacrifice and dark
magic. Tibetan Lamaism is filled with ritual sacrifice and dark magic.
By practicing such superstitious rituals, it denies itself to be
Buddhism of any kind.

>
>Secondly: in fact I met some Yungdrug "White" Bon practicioners and they
are
>not so evil as you describe them. They look even more peaceful,
introverted
>and tolerant than most of personal conflict-torn people from some
>schism-torn European Buddhist Sanghas. Please tell me Ray, "wer is der
Hund
>begraben?"

Appearance is deceiving. You have to look into exactly what they
practice in order to see their true evil face.

>
>Third question: in 2001-2004 years I was briefly a follower of Islam
invited
>by a friend who left Ole Nydahl's sangha because of some anti-Islamic
>stances of this Danish lama which he considered racist. But there were no
>Buddhist people who threatened me wih death in case of apostasy. Quite
>contrary, the Muslims stated such a threat at my first entrance to the
>mosque. That's why my personal relations with them were always tense and
I
>left them after three-four years despite their threats and returned to
>Buddhism finding no hostilities with my Kagyu friends. Will you maintain
>your opinion that Ningma, Kagyu, Gelug and so on are the most evil cults
in
>the light of the fact that I found some Muslim people who threatened
death
>to the Christians but no Buddhist people including those Tibetan schools
>doing so?

Just because some radical Muslims are evil, does not justify Lamaism
to be good. Just because some Lamas appear peaceful to you, doesn't
mean they do not practice the most evil cult religion on the face of
earth.

 Did you ever see the Geert Wilders' movie "Fitnah"? Who will take
>over the interitance of spiritually bankrupted post-Christian European
>culture in case the Vajrayana Yogis or quasi-Budhists don't do so? The
>Caliphate of Eurabia (whom PRC would probably su****t in Europe), the
>Zionist USrael, Illuminati Satanists or who? 

I see you are quite a superstitious fool yourself. No wonder you are
drawn to those evil practices.

>
>I know that Tibetan-derived schools are they are no angels, but do not
>demonize them. If they even are partially evil in your opinion, please
>realize that actually the European intellectual elite has invited them as
a
>lesser evil to counteract the poisonous Muslim propaganda among the
>relatively "poor" m***** and counterculture communities.

No one is demonizing them. I'm merely calling a spade a spade. In this
modern days, it is popular to pretend to be a peaceful Buddhist when
in fact what they practice behind their closed doors has nothing to do
with Buddhism at all.
 




 46 Posts in Topic:
Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
tuna <tuna2@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-25 04:43:59 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"MACE" <MACE  2008-04-25 20:29:39 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-25 06:41:29 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 19:31:24 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-27 00:12:17 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-27 00:12:42 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 08:44:45 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-29 12:04:15 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 10:13:48 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-29 18:41:23 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 02:28:56 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-01 23:30:58 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 04:21:08 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-02 10:55:08 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 04:00:16 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 01:29:29 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 06:35:41 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 13:06:01 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 07:20:12 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 14:00:40 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 08:18:47 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 14:43:47 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 09:12:06 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 15:46:26 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 15:45:26 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 15:43:28 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"MACE" <MACE  2008-04-26 16:18:11 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-25 07:20:28 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
xi <xieu.ling@[EMAIL P  2008-04-25 07:44:10 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 09:53:47 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
tang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 13:15:15 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-25 16:39:53 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 20:46:14 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-25 16:50:52 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Volt <voltchakhaluz@[E  2008-04-25 18:16:14 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:34:41 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Yaya Kimura <venuschas  2008-04-26 02:00:26 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
RuyenRang <ruyenrangvi  2008-04-26 08:33:11 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-27 07:49:33 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 21:03:38 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-27 18:25:38 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 01:16:54 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-29 06:31:30 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-29 06:48:33 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Volt <voltchakhaluz@[E  2008-04-29 18:16:42 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 21:21:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 14:32:56 CDT 2008.