Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Asian American > Re: Beijing 'to...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 46 Topic 9252 of 9492
Post > Topic >>

Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'

by Raymond <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 4, 2008 at 07:20 AM

On Sun, 04 May 2008 13:06:01 +0200, "Jakub A. Krzewicki"
<ebredel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>niedziela, 4 maja 2008 12:35. carbon entity 'Raymond' <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following letter:
>
>> Because she was duped by the evil that still exists in Tibetan
>> culture. There are evil elements in almost all cultures. Culture is
>> the fertile ground to breed evil. The more closed a culture is, the
>> more evil it becomes. That is why the modern democratic open society
>> is the best society for all people to live in.
>
>It's an "argument" why the old Polish Communist Party members were
excecuted
>by Joe Stalin in 1937. They were false accused of "being duped by the
evil
>capitalist government" of pre-WW2 Poland. The true reason was that Stalin
>didn't want Polish Communists because he was thinking about the 4th
>Partition of Poland with the Nazis which was agreed later 26 September
>1939.

Apples and oranges.

>  
>> Just because a poor woman is duped to believe in evil, doesn't mean
>> she has the right to destroy herself and her society by pursuing evil.
>> That is not patriotism. That is utter foolishness under the disguise
>> of patriotism and religious loyalty.
>
>What do you think: had the Polish Socialist Party refugees in London
right
>to sup****t the 1944 Warsaw uprising (which they actually did) or not? I
>remember they excellently knew at Stalin will deliberately ignore this
>uprising and leave Warsaw for a prey of the Nazi German Forces.

Apples and oranges.

>
>> The current Tibetan government is not an occupational government. It
>> is run by former Tibetan slaves who are the real masters in the land
>> of Tibet today. Just because they have been loyal Communists since the
>> day they were free from the Devil(dalai) Lama's feudal rule, doesn't
>> mean they have become Hans by taking over the control of the Tibetan
>> government.
>
>So why the CCP is necessary for them at all. Did they not realize that
the
>degenerated "workers country" CCP is even no longer a real Communist
>coutry, for the present it's actually a monopolistic capitalist empire in
>the full sense of the word under the disguise of Communism. Worst even
from
>the other capitalist imperialist who at least care for some external
>appearance of democracy.

They are loyal Chinese Communists themselves not because they believe
in Marxism. They are loyal Chinese Communists because they are free
human beings thanks to the Han Chinese. Get your facts straight and
stop speaking for the evil dark force of the Devil(dalai) Lama.

> 
>> What is the best for the East or anybody else is not something that
>> really concerns you. You should be worried about what is the best for
>> yourself by being a moral busybody.
>
>The Greek philosophy made the statement that the own independent
conscience
>is the best moral guide of the human and the ultimate, unspoiled source
of
>their morality.  I think their were really close to the truth.

The problem is, you are speaking for a handful Tibetan slave owners
who have since been driven out of Tibet while I'm showing you the fact
that Tibet is ruled by Tibetan people today who were slaves under the
Devil(dalai) Lama's evil rule in the old Tibet. Your truth is the
truth of the evil slave owners. It's actually lies by definition.
 




 46 Posts in Topic:
Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
tuna <tuna2@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-25 04:43:59 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"MACE" <MACE  2008-04-25 20:29:39 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-25 06:41:29 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 19:31:24 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-27 00:12:17 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-27 00:12:42 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 08:44:45 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-29 12:04:15 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-29 10:13:48 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-04-29 18:41:23 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 02:28:56 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-01 23:30:58 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-02 04:21:08 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-02 10:55:08 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-03 04:00:16 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 01:29:29 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 06:35:41 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 13:06:01 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 07:20:12 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 14:00:40 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 08:18:47 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"Jakub A. Krzewicki&  2008-05-04 14:43:47 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-05-04 09:12:06 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 15:46:26 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 15:45:26 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-05 15:43:28 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
"MACE" <MACE  2008-04-26 16:18:11 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Lproudman@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-04-25 07:20:28 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
xi <xieu.ling@[EMAIL P  2008-04-25 07:44:10 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 09:53:47 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
tang@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-25 13:15:15 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-25 16:39:53 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 20:46:14 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
pg <penang@[EMAIL PROT  2008-04-25 16:50:52 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Volt <voltchakhaluz@[E  2008-04-25 18:16:14 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-25 22:34:41 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Yaya Kimura <venuschas  2008-04-26 02:00:26 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
RuyenRang <ruyenrangvi  2008-04-26 08:33:11 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-27 07:49:33 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-27 21:03:38 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-27 18:25:38 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Raymond <niday@[EMAIL   2008-04-28 01:16:54 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-29 06:31:30 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
DangCSvietnam <DangCSv  2008-04-29 06:48:33 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
Volt <voltchakhaluz@[E  2008-04-29 18:16:42 
Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'
jimzorn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-01 21:21:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 3:18:24 CDT 2008.