Re: Beijing 'to talk to Dalai aides'

On Sun, 04 May 2008 14:43:47 +0200, "Jakub A. Krzewicki"
<ebredel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>niedziela, 4 maja 2008 14:18. carbon entity 'Raymond' <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following letter:
>
>
>> It's no fiction. The mountains of evidences of the Devil Lama's evil
>> rule in Tibet are still around and are readily available over the
>> internet. It is you who choose to be an ignorant fool by refusing to
>> see the facts. I wish you to become one of the Devil Lama's human
>> livestock so that he could ride you like a horse to go anywhere across
>> the barren Tibetan high plateau.
>
>I don't wish you to be anybody's human livestock. Even DL knows that
there
>is too late to return to feudalism in 21th Century.

If that were true why would the **** still be demanding for power and
control over the people of Tibet? Why are you still pretending to be
his loyal human livestock? 

>
>>>Are you still so naive that you think they are going to return to the
role
>>>of slave owners? Those generation is rather dying and the present
>>>generation of the refugees are attually closer to the modern view of
the
>>>political system as in the EU.
>> 
>> The Devil Lama is a former slave owner. For the Devil Lama to return
>> to power is for the brutal theocratic feudal regime to return to
>> power. You can lie your ass off, but the fact remains for all the
>> world to see.
>
>You've been kidding or what? In the age of computers it is really not
>possible to return to feudalism.

That is why you are doomed to fail. You have no idea how stupid you
truly are by speaking for the force of evil and old.

 Of course, there will be a possiblity for
>him to gain some influence in Tibet if the PRC-backed administration
>withdrew from this area, but he would not be so powerful to return to the
>old system.

Too bad the former Tibetan slaves which constitute 95% Tibetans would
disagree. They want no business with their former slave owner. If not
because they are still imprisoned in their century old religious
bondage, they would have eaten the Devil Lama alive long time ago.

 After all he had issued a modern western-like constuitution
>himself, and (at least for present) he appears to obey this law himself,
>which is totally independent from the issue how seriously (or not) his
>government can be taken. Still I would rather have a clown and a liar and
>even a reformed former tyrant from my own nation on the throne than
>somebody who are imposed by the same kind of "fraternal help" which the
>USSR made in 1968 to Czechoslovakia.

That's nothing but wild imagination in your own ****ing mind. We
Chinese are nothing like those European proletariats. It is not for
you to decide for the Tibetan people to accept their former oppressor
as their new dictator. They are already masters of their own land, and
they are Communists as well. So **** you for forcing your will onto
them.

>
>How do you think, why the Belarussians don't ask Russia or Poland or
Ukraine
>for such a kind of help now, despite they are governed by Alexander
>Lukashenko?