lynx wrote:
> Mr. 7% wrote:
>
> > "ralph" <rsteadman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:trrlt3hjnbgql94t36tkvlv0pqhmte6utd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:52:25 +1000, "Steel Golem"
> >> <sliver_steel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Considering that the election was held on 24 November 2007 care to
explain
> >>> how an interest rate rise on 12 November can be "directly
attributable to
> >>> KRudd!"?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> This one is debatable of course, but as all the polls were showing a
> >> clear Labor victory less than 3 weeks out from the election ... why
> >> would you expect the RBA not to consider that likely event in the
> >> November meeting?
> >
> > Because RBA decisions are based on PAST data, not nostradamous
predictions.
> >
> > You have already been told this numerous times, it's the usual Lib
Party
> > whinge and sour-grapes about having lost the election... thats what it
comes
> > down to.
> >
> > 11 Interest Rate rises in a row under Howard and ****ing ALLEHUIA! The
Libs
> > have discovered we have an inflation and interest rate problem!
>
> totally a WHOPPING 1.6% in eleven years!! Oh God! how did we ever
> survive?? However.. lowest unemployment rate in 33 years, lowest
> industrial disputes since 1908, inflation kept within RBA guidelines for
> the life of the cycle, record consumer spending, Labors $96 billion debt
> paid off and our AAA credit rating restored, etc., etc., etc., Interest
> rates don't tell the whole story.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2f9zt6
Naturally, the lying lefties want to take all the credit will placing
the blame elsewhere. Meanwhile, we've had 4 interest rate rises
(that's 1 whole percent!) already and its only been 5 months!
|
