Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Australian > Re: HMAS Sydney...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 112 Topic 24064 of 29774
Post > Topic >>

Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?

by "Serge" <serge@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 20, 2008 at 11:50 PM

"regn.pickford" <regn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:47e172e2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "David Moss" <q0320811@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:MPG.224bb57eff3e36f498b2ce@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > 01.iinet.net.au>, serge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes...
> >
> >> True! They would be a little embarrassed about coming back home after
> >> their cruiser was sucked into coming within 900 metres of a lightly
> >> armed German raider and blown clean out of the water, but that's a
> >> small price to pay.
> >
> > Try to get a clue Sergey boy.
> > The Kormoran packed six 150mm guns and four torpedo tubes, but looked
> > like a Dutch freighter. When challenged from 20km away she identified
> > herself as the Dutch freighter Straat Malakksa. The Sydney closed to
> > within 100m to confirm, but the disguise was obviously very good
because
> > the Sydney did not even train its guns on the "freighter as she
> > approached. As the Sydney moved within 1000m the Kormaran opened fire
> > from its hidden guns and fired torpedoes from below the waterline.
> > Sydney was hit at least 50 times with 155mm shells and took a torpedo
in
> > the bow. The Kormoran also swept the Sydney's deck with its five 20mm
> > anti-aircraft machine guns and targeted her bridge with two 37mm anti-
> > armour guns. Basically the Sydney was doomed as soon as it got within
> > 1000m of what was effectively another light cruiser that was already
at
> > battle stations.
> >
> > Despite all this carnage the Sydney did manage to return fire,
damaging
> > the Kormoran so badly it had to be abandoned. Not a bad effort under
the
> > cir***stances.
> >
> > Was the Sydney's captain a dill for getting so close without realizing
> > the danger? Well if he was, he was in good company. 10 other dills
made
> > the same mistake and lost their ****ps to the Kormoran. How many more
> > would have fallen victim if the stricken Sydney hadn't fought to the
> > death is anyone's guess. Thats why the wreck of the Sydney is a war
> > grave.
> >
> > Those blokes were heroes Sergey, and you are lower than shark ****.
> > Just so you know.
> >
>
> hear, hear!


That should read Hear! Hear! you fool.

So what are you agreeing with?

This is what that idiot, Moss had to say in his jingoistic bull**** above:

> > The Kormoran packed six 150mm guns
> > Sydney was hit at least 50 times with 155mm shells

Perhaps you can ask Moss how a 150 mm gun can fire a 155 mm shell. 
ROFLMAO


He also said, and I quote...

> > The Sydney closed to within 100m

That's right! The length of two olympic swimming pools  ROFL

And you say Hear! Hear!  :-}

To what?  To the fact that he's an idiot?
 




 112 Posts in Topic:
HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-19 22:00:59 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-19 22:09:53 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-20 21:51:15 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-20 22:09:30 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-26 18:53:40 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-26 20:07:02 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-19 13:43:38 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"regn.pickford"  2008-03-19 20:09:07 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-20 23:50:24 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
PeterLucas <Peter@[EMA  2008-03-19 21:34:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
lynx <none@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-20 05:50:45 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-20 22:38:09 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-21 02:40:51 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Green Lantern"  2008-03-21 03:52:05 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 00:50:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Sunny" <wom  2008-03-21 23:07:48 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-21 23:58:40 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Green Lantern"  2008-03-22 00:59:11 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
lynx <none@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-22 07:41:44 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 22:05:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
lynx <none@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-26 05:17:54 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Ricky <Richard.Phelan@  2008-03-20 07:20:35 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Sunny" <wom  2008-03-19 22:21:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-19 15:28:23 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-26 18:54:18 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-26 19:49:47 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-26 22:43:45 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-26 23:17:11 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Away--pits <spamlister  2008-03-19 18:41:05 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-20 23:01:15 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Green Lantern"  2008-03-20 13:24:13 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 01:05:33 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-20 04:48:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-20 02:19:35 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-20 22:51:25 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-20 23:20:29 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-26 18:51:47 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Tex" <tropi  2008-03-26 20:10:58 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Sunny" <wom  2008-03-20 22:55:04 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Ernst Kammhuber&quo  2008-03-26 20:00:36 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-28 09:07:52 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Ernst Kammhuber&quo  2008-03-29 00:36:22 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-30 14:40:27 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-04-02 08:12:56 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-04-02 13:38:31 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Brian Dooley <brian-d@  2008-04-01 14:13:28 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Sunny" <wom  2008-04-01 03:59:52 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-29 00:04:59 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Ernst Kammhuber&quo  2008-03-29 23:12:01 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-30 03:09:50 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-30 20:50:03 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-30 21:38:22 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-31 06:22:07 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-31 20:30:13 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-31 06:20:11 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
thingy <thingy@[EMAIL   2008-04-01 08:36:46 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-20 05:19:03 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-21 21:15:21 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-21 12:25:38 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 01:07:06 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-22 00:27:26 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 18:44:06 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-22 08:32:58 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-23 00:16:36 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-22 06:30:13 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-22 06:28:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 22:21:32 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-22 13:36:10 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Government Shill #2 <g  2008-03-22 15:56:53 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Sunny" <wom  2008-03-22 23:15:53 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-23 12:45:10 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-24 22:54:54 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-24 22:39:59 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-25 21:00:15 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-25 21:39:44 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-23 12:50:04 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Liam O'Shea <liam.oshe  2008-03-21 12:39:56 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 23:01:50 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-21 06:54:00 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
PeterLucas <Peter@[EMA  2008-03-21 18:55:52 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-22 18:50:43 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Trev <snoopy.red.back.  2008-03-21 20:53:55 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Green Lantern"  2008-03-22 04:28:22 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
lynx <none@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-22 07:46:22 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-23 00:23:26 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-21 22:08:09 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-21 22:11:01 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Trev <snoopy.red.back.  2008-03-21 22:46:08 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-22 02:11:21 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-22 06:30:55 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-25 21:03:17 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-22 07:11:56 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-24 16:34:08 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-24 07:57:56 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-24 22:16:37 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
B J Foster <bjfoster@[  2008-03-24 22:48:48 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-24 23:44:33 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
B J Foster <bjfoster@[  2008-03-25 06:53:17 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
David Moss <q0320811@[  2008-03-24 22:36:18 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
B J Foster <bjfoster@[  2008-03-25 19:27:41 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-25 21:42:52 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Praetorian" &l  2008-03-25 21:31:36 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-22 11:44:49 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Government Shill #2 <g  2008-03-22 19:49:53 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-25 01:41:15 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-25 02:17:02 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-25 02:29:21 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
Addinall <addinall@[EM  2008-03-25 03:58:25 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-27 22:24:20 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Sunny" <wom  2008-03-27 22:39:58 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
"Serge" <ser  2008-03-31 20:31:26 
Re: HMAS Sydney to be a war grave. WHY?
george <gblack@[EMAIL   2008-03-31 20:02:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 2:23:09 CST 2008.