Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=6715
March 24, 2008
9/11: How many virtual proofs does it take to turn on the 9/11 light
bulb in people's minds?
By David Watts
I think this list could be used as a simple way to turn on some
9/11 light bulbs in more people's heads. This list can be handed
or sent to anyone to read and thereby relieve yourself of the often
agonizing exercise of trying to actually get people to listen.
::::::::
9/11: How many virtual proofs does it take to turn on the 9/11 light
bulb in peoples minds? A keep it simple approach.
(Note: This is a work in progress that will likely change somewhat
as I receive suggestions, if I do. I have already made a couple of
changes since this was first posted. Those changes have been
referenced in the comments.)
As I wrote the following, I asked myself if this is simple enough
for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Ron Paul and John McCain to
understand?; is it simple enough for my Representative and Senator
to understand?; is it simple enough for writers and editors in the
media to understand?; is it simple enough for Tim Russert, Chris
Matthews, Bill Maher, and Keith Olberman to understand?; is it
simple enough for Arianna Huffington, Matt Drudge, and Christoper
Hitchens to understand?; is it simple enough for Brian Williams,
Charles Gibson, and Katie Couric to understand?; is it simple enough
for Lou Dobbs, John McLaughlin, and 60 Minutes to understand?; is
it simple enough for Joe Scarborough, Willie Geist, Glen Beck, and
Alan Colmes to understand?; is it simple enough for my neighbors,
my fellow workers, my friends to understand?; is it simple enough
for a sensible junior high schooler to understand?; is it simple
enough for a common sensical 10-year-old to understand?; is it
simple enough for me to understand (I hope so)?
Following are examples of events of 9/11 that by themselves virtually
prove the Official Story of 9/11 to be a lie. The Official Story
of course, is that 19 Islamic hijackers caused the death and
destruction on 9/11. I use the word virtually because some people
offer implausible or highly improbable alternative explanations.
And if taken by themselves, it is possible that an implausible or
highly improbable explanation or two could be true. However, I
contend that many of the following examples by themselves actually
DO prove the Official Story to be a lie. To believe the Official
Story, one must believe virtually ALL of the implausible or improbable
explanations. For if only one sup****t for the Official Story is
proven to be false, the whole Story begins to crumble. And mind
you, these are NOT isolated events. They are all major parts of the
Official Story. So, like a veterinarian examining a sick puppy, ALL
symptoms -- in this case, events -- must be considered in the
diagnosis. The veterinarian can perhaps explain away a single symptom
or two, but you are not going to be happy if he tries to explain
away all of the many symptoms that are ailing your dog. After all,
its your puppy dog; or in this case, your country and your disappearing
rights; or your relative or friend that was killed on 9/11; or your
maimed or dead brother/sister/mother/father/son/daughter in Iraq
or Afghanistan; or a sick or dying First Responder; or....or....or....
The following list is quite simple and straightforward; but by no
means, all inclusive:
1. Given the fact that there was not much airplane debris found at
the Pentagon and the best explanation the Official Story can come
up with is that most of the large 757 airliner va****ized; yet the
Official Story claims they were able to identify each and every
passenger and crew member through UNva****ized DNA -- NONE with an
Arab sounding name; then this alone virtually proves the Official
Story to be a lie.
2. Given that the Official Story requires that a 125 foot wide 757
made only a 16 to 20 foot wide hole when it hit the Pentagon; and
given that NIST claims that the airplanes that hit the Twin Towers
severed massive interior steel columns after severing the perimeter
steel columns; yet the wings, tail section, and massive engines
were not able to penetrate the reinforced concrete walls of the
Pentagon, something doesnt add up. Therefore, this alone virtually
proves the Official Story to be a lie.
3. As flight data recorders (FDRs) accurately record flight data
-- if the FDR is damaged, data is destroyed, not altered -- and the
FDR recorded (data provided by the NTSB/government) that the 757
that allegedly hit the Pentagon actually flew on a different track
(as corroborated by witnesses at the time including Pentagon
policemen) than the Official Story requires; and that same FDR
recorded the 757 never being low enough to hit the Pentagon;
then something ELSE must have hit the Pentagon. The only video
released was five frames and definitely did NOT show a 757. It
showed something much smaller and looked more like either a missile
or a Global Hawk, an unmanned aerial vehicle. This smaller flying
object is consistent with the smallish hole created on impact and
with the little amount of "airplane" debris that was recovered.
These facts alone virtually prove the Official Story to be a lie.
4. The fact that both Twin Towers collapsed in symmetrically identical
fa****on even though the South Tower was hit very significantly
off-center means something other than straight forward gravitational
collapses were at work. That alone virtually proves the Official
Story to be a lie.
5. The fact that the top section of EACH Twin Tower was able to
plow its way symmetrically through the ENTIRE 80-90 stories below
about as quickly as if it had fallen through thin air is alone
enough to virtually prove the Official Story to be a lie.
TTS2
6. There were many people including firemen who re****ted that molten
metal was seen below all three (one not hit by an airplane) buildings
that collapsed on 9/11. And there is a LOT of corroborating evidence
in sup****t of there being molten metal below the rubble such as
extremely high temperatures recorded on NASA thermal maps and
pictures of extremely hot orange/white hot steel. Only one thing
could account for flowing molten metal: thermite.
Evidence of thermite at ground zero was found. There would be no
reason for the existence of thermite at the sites other than it
being the reason for the molten metal. If there was molten metal
underneath any -- much less all three as was re****ted -- of the
three buildings that collapsed on 9/11 as re****ted by firemen and
others as flowing like lava for many weeks, then for the Official
Story to be true there must be a scientific explanation for its
existence that does not belie the Official Story. Since there is
no such scientific explanation, that alone virtually proves the
Official Story to be a lie.
7. Physical laws -- the kinds of laws Isaac Newton discovered and
which govern our universe --were violated on 9/11: The law of falling
objects following the paths of least resistance; the law of
conservation of momentum;
the law of conservation of angular momentum. According to
conservation-of-momentum laws, the block of approximately 34 floors
on top of the South Tower should have continued to topple and fall
through the path of least resistance: the air. It should have
continued to topple and fall to the ground far outside the buildings
footprint and NOT through the path of most resistance: the building
itself. That same block which can be seen twisting at the start of
the collapse should have kept twisting and obeyed the law of
conservation of angular momentum but the rotation suddenly stopped.
The stopping of both its rotation and its toppling can only be
explained by the breakup of most of the block, which would have
destroyed its moment of inertia. But there is no good explanation
for the upper block to break up at the start of the collapse; unless
of course, it was being broken up in a purposeful way as in a
controlled demolition. This violation of physical laws alone virtually
proves that the Official Story is a lie.
8. Evidence has shown that nearly all of the concrete in both Twin
Towers was pulverized into dust and powder, with a very large
percentage of this being fine micron sized particles, as small as
0.2 microns. Since there is no mechanism in a simple gravity collapse
to apply the energy in the perfectly even manner required to pulverize
nearly all of the concrete into fine powder, microns thick, something
else must have been taking place. And even if nearly all of the
potential gravitational energy was actually released in the perfectly
even fa****on required and actually was being converted -- no longer
being gravitational energy -- into FINE FLOATING powder, where was
the energy required to plow through the ENTIRE Towers at nearly
free-fall speed?
The gravitational energy had been converted into floating powder.
And as anyone would know, fine floating powder floats, and doesnt
push down very hard. This isnt rocket science. It really is very
simple; just ask any 10 year old with common sense. Floating powder
doesnt crush massive buildings, much less at nearly free-fall speed.
This alone virtually proves the Official Story to be a lie.
9. WTC7, a steel-framed building collapsed on 9/11 even though it
was not hit by an airplane. The 47 story tall building collapased
in a perfectly symmetrical fa****on on 9/11. In fact you can put a
ruler on the screen as you view the collapse and it comes PERFECTLY
STRAIGHT DOWN ON A LINE! The collapse exhibited every single
characteristic of a controlled demolition; or perhaps better said,
a finely produced implosion. And there was not a single characteristic
of destruction by fire; much less asymmetrical fire or even
asymmetrical damage. In fact, neither governmental agency, NIST nor
FEMA has been able to figure out how fires could have caused the
collapse. WTC7 was a TALL, NARROW, massively braced steel-framed
building. For such a TALL, NARROW building to come down in such a
precisely symmetrical fa****on -- vs. falling off to the side -- and
DIRECTLY into its own footprint at about the speed of a falling
brick; common sense would say that would be impossible; unless of
course, it had a lot of demolition help.
WTC7
There were even multiple re****ts of a countdown (as in 5..4..3..2..1..
explosions, collapse) heard over radios that ended with large
explosions followed by the collapse. What does that tell you? That
tells you they knew the exact second WTC7 was going to collapse.
That can only mean they knew exactly what second they were going
to push the button to start the controlled demolition. There are
other factors easily researched that also show prior knowledge that
WTC7 was about to come down.
Molten metal was observed below WTC7. That fact cannot be explained
away other than in terms of a substance like thermite (evidence of
which was found in the rubble) which melts metal like a scalding
frying pan liquifies warm butter and is used in demolitions of
steel-framed buildings.
Even Mr. Silverstein who had leased and insured all of the WTC
buildings just weeks prior to 9/11 said later on PBS that he told
them to pull (a demolition term) WTC7. An example of the use of
this term happened just prior to demoli****ng WTC6 after 9/11: a
worker in a hard hat can be seen and heard saying, theyre gettin
ready to pull buildin six. Larry Silverstein subsequently collected
several billions of dollars for his destroyed buildings.
Now put all of these things together -- there are more -- and see
how contorted ones reasoning would have to be to not understand
WTC7 was a controlled demolition. The collapse of WTC7 alone virtually
proves the Official Story to be a lie.
10. Two hijackers pass****ts survived the aircraft crashes on 9/11
as well as a hijackers bandana. One of the pass****ts was from a
plane that impacted one of the Twin Towers and was found on the
streets below. The pass****t came away unscathed from the violent
crash and tremendous fireball.
The other pass****t was found unscathed from the wreckage of the
airplane that disappeared into the ground in Pennsylvania. The
undamaged (looked just like new) red bandana was also found in the
same wreckage of the airplane that disappeared into the ground.
Each one surviving in such good condition is by itself nearly
impossible. But what about ALL three? (Remember, all three items
were central to proving that Muslim hijackers were responsible.
These werent random/miscellaneous findings.) Well, (one nearly
impossible) times (another nearly impossible) times (another nearly
impossible) = virtually NO chance at all. Now multiply virtually
no chance by the chance that each item in this list could have
happened the way the Official Story requires, and what do you get?
How about virtual-ZERO. If the pass****ts and bandana were planted
at the scene, what is the chance of finding all three? 100%, of
course. So virtual-zero% vs. 100%. This alone virtually proves the
Official Story to be a lie.
11. The Trans****tation Secretary, Norman Minetta, testified that a
young man came up to Mr. Cheney in the command bunker at about 9:25
AM on 9/11 -- the Pentagon was hit shortly after -- and said, During
the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was
a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The
plane is 50 miles out". . . . . "The plane is 30 miles out" . . .
.. ..And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out, the young
man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?"
And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said,
"Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the
contrary?" The only reasonable explanation is that the young man
was asking if the orders to NOT shoot down the plane that the young
man was referring to and was 10 miles out from the Pentagon, still
stand, i.e., there were stand down orders. Add to this the fact
there were no intercepts by military aircraft of any of the hijacked
airplanes and normal protocol would have had the airplanes intercepted
within minutes and is therefore consistent with stand down orders;
it is reasonable to conclude there were in fact, stand down orders.
This alone virtually proves that the Official Story is a lie.
12. To believe the Official Story one must believe that the five
or more confusing PRACTICE exercises and war games that were occurring
on 9/11 were mere coincidences. These confusing exercises werent
planned for 9/10 or 9/12; they were planned for 9/11. Those exercises
included the simulation of hijacked airplanes cra****ng into buildings
and confusing FALSE radar blips.
And, while not on 9/11, those believers of the Official Story of
the 7/7 London bombings in 2005, also have to believe that the
practice anti-terrorist drills occurring at the same time as the
actual bombings were a mere coincidence. At the very exact time,
in the very exact places (multiple, and not on a different street
or on a different subway or on a different bus), that the exercises
were beginning to take place, real live bombs started exploding.
So the trained officials and people were in position ahead of time
to handle the resulting chaos that occurred, much the same as what
happened on 9/11. So, the highly incredible unliklihood of such
pre-placing of trained officials and people, and confusing radar
blips, is much, MUCH more likely to NOT be a coincidence just as
in the London bombings in which actuaries say the chances of that
occurring is magnitudes off the charts, i.e., beyond virtually
impossible. Keep in mind that these absolutely incredible coincidences
occurred in two separate terror attacks. I say this coincidental
occurrence of these two separate, absolutely mind boggling,
coincidences should be called, The Mother of All Coincidences!
(Perhaps they really weren't separate as they both occurred in the
War On Terror.) Given that the much simpler explanation -- in
accordance with Occams razor -- would be that these actually were
NOT coincidences and they are simply unbelievable, then this alone
virtually proves the Official Story to be a lie.
13. It is highly probable that Barbara Olson never made those famous
phone calls to her husband, Ted Olson. The FBI says there were no
cell phone calls from Barbara. That combined with the fact that
there apparently were NO onboard phones on the American Airlines
757 means the calls could not have taken place. All of the available
information indicates there were no onboard phones yet it is not
absolutely conclusive. However, these doubts about the phone calls
could easily be put to rest with a simple investigation to find out
whether in fact there were onboard phones and checking phone records.
(Actually, even IF there were onboard phones, there are many other
reasons to doubt the phone calls actually took place. Those reasons
have been clearly explained by both the Pilotsfor911truth and the
scholar, David Ray Griffin.) But like everything else regarding
9/11, this simple thing goes un-investigated and the doubts are
allowed to remain. And if a simple investigation were to prove the
phone calls (which were front and center around which the Muslim
hijackers-with-box-cutters myth was built) never took place as the
evidence indicates was probably the case, that alone would virtually
prove the Official Story to be a lie.
14. If the Official Story is true, there should be no reason for
the government to hide anything. Given that NIST, a governmental
agency, will not release the 6,899 photographs and over 300 hours
of recordings acquired from mostly private parties and admits to
holding; and given the fact that the FBI/government confiscated
video recordings within MINUTES of the impact at the Pentagon that
would have shown the 757 -- if it really was a 757 -- and those
recording have never been released even though they could put doubts
to rest; and given that there were many dozens of other cameras
that would have shown the 757 -- if it indeed was a 757 -- hitting
the Pentagon have never been released even though they could put
doubts to rest; and given that they destroyed audio recordings made
by FAA air traffic controllers to do***ent what happened on 9/11;
and given the fact that a large crate covered by a blue tarp was
removed from the Pentagon and its contents never revealed; and given
the fact they refuse to allow inspection of recovered aircraft parts
that would positively identify all four of the aircraft via serial
numbers even though that would put doubts to rest; and given the
fact that the flight data recorders themselves would contain recorded
flight information from previous flights made by the aircraft and
could be used for positive identification of the aircraft, yet they
refuse to release the data even though that would put doubts to
rest; and given the fact that inspection of the steel columns would
have revealed how the first collapses ever (there were THREE!)
occurred for steel-framed buildings due to fire, yet they removed
and ****pped overseas nearly ALL of the steel columns in defiance
of requests not to do so; and given the fact the Bush/Cheney
administration tried very hard to prevent any investigation into
9/11; and given the fact that the 9/11 Commission both distorted
and omitted highly incriminating evidence indicating the Official
Story to be a lie; it must be concluded that they are hiding a lot
of things and will allow the doubts to persist -- no doubt because
they are afraid of the real Truth being revealed. Alone, this hiding
of so many things by the government virtually proves the Official
Story to be a lie.
15. The following is from an article by Paul Joseph Watson (note
this information -- like nearly ALL 9/11 facts -- does not get
re****ted by our main stream media here in the U.S.):
Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of
Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling
Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the
CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global
intelligence agencies.
Cossiga was elected President of the Italian Senate in July 1983
before winning a landslide 1985 election to become President of the
country in 1985.
Cossiga gained respect from opposition parties as one of a rare
breed - an honest politician - and led the country for seven years
until April 1992.
Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political
establishment and he was forced to resign after revealing the
existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue
intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings
across Europe in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
Gladio's specialty was to carry out what they coined "false flag
operations," terror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and
geopolitical opposition.
Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary
investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed
that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence
apparatus.
In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn
testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children,
innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game.
The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the
state to ask for greater security."
Cossiga's new revelations appeared last week in Italy's oldest and
most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera.
A translation from Italys most respected newspaper of what Italys
ex-President said:
"[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack]
to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the
attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America
and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack has been
planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad.... in
order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to
induce the western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."
If there is any truth to what Mr. Cossiga said about the CIA planning
9/11 -- and given that all of the proof/virtual proof above (#s 1
through 14) and all of the other evidence not presented here is
consistent with the article, there is very good reason to believe
what the Italian ex-President said is true -- that alone would
virtually prove that the Official Story is a lie.
There are more virtual proofs that could be added to this list of
fifteen. For example, I could add:
16. President Bush claimed on at least two occasions that he watched
the first airplane impact the North Tower just prior to entering
the classroom where he saw fit to remain reading about a pet goat.
He even gave specific recollections of what he was thinking when
he watched the airplane hit the Tower. That is a good indication
his recollection was clear and honest. Given that there was no
public broadcast of the first crash, the only way he could have
seen the first crash would have been if there was some sort of
closed circuit broadcast. That would mean that the monitor was set
up in the school specifically for viewing that specific event; which
virtually could only mean that this alone proves the Official Story
is a lie.
Or how about adding this one:
17) Heres one that just occurred to me. And this might be one of
the most convincing of all. A lot of things happened on 9/11. So
it should be no surprise that there may have been a few anomalies
that were hard to reconcile.
There should as well have been countless examples of things that
were straightforwrd and easy to explain. BUT! IS THERE A SINGLE
THING ABOUT 9/11 THAT IS NOT ANOMALOUS? IS THERE A SINGLE THING
ABOUT 9/11 THAT IS NOT LACED WITH DOUBT? (There may be but I cant
think of anything. Offer them up in the comments.) This fact alone
virtually proves the Official Story to be one big fat LIE!
I think this list could be used as a simple way to turn on some
9/11 light bulbs in more peoples heads. This list can be handed or
sent to anyone to read and thereby relieve yourself of the often
agonizing exercise of trying to actually get people to listen. Its
quite simple and for the most part, pretty easy to understand. And
its a lot easier and quicker than reading a book or watching a long
video or reading lengthy articles online about one specific aspect
of 9/11. Then, once the bulb starts to light up, all of those other
things can be used to nail the Truth home. This is similar to the
cards that list a number of 9/11 facts; however, this list gives
more detailed substance without being too long. Therefore, it should
be even more convincing.
Presenting this fairly simple list ought to be enough to at least
start opening the eyes and minds for all but the most closed minded.
Tell people to be empirical; to look at the facts. Tell them not
to get caught up in it being labeled a conspiracy theory; why would
they kill innocent Americans; how would they have done it; and how
would they hide such a seemingly large conspiracy. Tell them that
just because they dont hear about this in the media, that doesnt
mean its not true. Tell them they may find themselves asking if its
this simple and apparently so obvious, why doesnt everyone know?
Tell them the reason everyone doesnt know is primarily because not
enough have actually looked at the facts; but more and more people
everyday -- take the Japanese Parliament for example -- are indeed
looking at the facts and understanding the Official Story is one
great big LIE. Tell them the bigger the lie, the more easily people
are fooled. Tell them that the Patriotic thing to do is question
your government when it deserves to be questioned. Tell them the
founding fathers of our country said the hard part will be holding
on to the liberties we have given them; liberties must not be taken
for granted. Tell them there are thousands of patriotsfor911truth,
physicistsfor911truth, architechturalengineersfor911truth,
veteransfor911truth, pilotsfor911truth, scholarsfor911truth,
canadiensfor911truth, Irishfor911truth, Scottsfor911truth,
Newfoundlandersfor911truth, Australiansfor911truth, people and
scientists and politicians from all around the world for 911truth.
Tell them the truth about 911 is being debated in the Japanese
Parliament.
Have people ask themselves these questions:
1) Why would so many highly respected people, including so many
highly respected people from around the globe, spend so much time
trying to get out what they believe is the truth about 9/11 if there
wasnt a damn good reason to believe the Official Story is a lie?
2) Why does the main stream media in the United States virtually
ignore all of the evidence and other incriminating information that
many other countries around the world recognize?
3) Why do so many obvious, and what should be easily answered
questions, go un-addressed?
4) Who is it that has restricted many of our constitutional rights
and liberties, al Qaeda or our own government?
5) We are being told we need to have our constitutional rights
restricted and taken away in order to protect us; yet they could
not protect us on 9/11 in spite of the fact they had a multitude
of warnings including from within our own intelligence agencies and
other governments; including Britain, France, Italy, Egypt, Israel,
Saudi Arabia, and Russia. Some of the warnings were dire and some
were specific about the possibility of terrorists using hijacked
airplanes as weapons. There was also the now famous presidential
daily briefing given to George Bush titled Bin Ladin Determined To
Strike Within the United States. Even given so many warnings
(including warnings of using hijacked airplanes as weapons), George
Bush claimed when he saw the first airplane hit the Tower he thought
it was a terrible accident; it didnt even occur to him that it might
be a terrorist attack.
So the question people should be asking themselves: Is protecting
us the real reason they want to spy on U.S. citizens?
6) If there are so many people who have so many doubts, and if our
government (shadow, secret, or otherwise) has nothing to hide, why
not have an honest and independent investigation to put all of the
doubts to rest?
Read and have other people read The End Of America by best selling
author Naomi Wolf. Open peoples minds.
Read and have other people read The Shell Game by best selling
author Steve Alten. Open peoples minds. (Watch the Trailers at
www.theshellgame.net)
Read and have other people read books by David Ray Griffin. Open
peoples minds.
(Right now you can buy the combination of David Ray Griffin's new
book, 9/11 CONTRADICTIONS: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press
and Steve Alten's new book The Shell Game at a reduced price at
Amazon.com.)
Watch and have other people watch 9/11 Mysteries. Open peoples
minds.
Watch and have other people watch videos by Richard Gage at
ae911truth.ORG. Open peoples minds.
Watch and have other people watch Power of Nightmares. Open peoples
minds.
Watch and have other people watch Terrorstorm. Open peoples minds.
Watch and have other people watch Endgame (by Alex Jones). Open
peoples minds.
Watch and have other people watch Zeitgeist. Open peoples minds.
Watch and have other people watch Freedom to Fascism. Open peoples
minds.
Watch or read and have other people watch or read Manufacturing
Consent.
Open peoples minds.
Watch and have people watch Money as Debt. Open peoples minds.
Watch and have people watch The Money Masters. Open peoples minds.
Read and have other people read "The Truth About Money!" at
http://www.lovethetruth.com/truth_about_money.htm
Open people's
minds.
Read and have other people read COMMON SENSE - An Introduction to
the Dangers of The New World Order and UNCOMMON SENSE - Your Coice:
The Blue Pill or the Red Pill? by George Humphrey. Open people's
minds.
Read about and have other people read about False Flag operations.
Open peoples minds.
Read about and have other people read about Sibel Edmonds. Open
peoples minds.
Read the list and have people read the list of 911Patriots. Open
peoples minds.
Investigate and have people investigate 9/11 on the internet. Open
peoples minds.
Get this list to as many people as possible.
Get this list to as many media people as possible.
Get this list to as many Senators and Representatives (both U.S.
and State) as possible.
Get involved and get other people involved with a local 911Truth
group such as 911visibility or WeAreChange.
Understand and get other people to understand the very likely Next
9/11 (BIG TIME) like the first 9/11 will not have been carried out
by al Qaeda but will be carried out by "insiders."
Help in the quest for a real investigation before its too late. It
looks like they plan to do it again, BIG time!
(And, please place in the comments other suggestions for virtual
proofs and suggestions on how this list can be improved.) (Dont let
me know if you think it should be trashed.)
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
|
