Rod Speed wrote:
> Sir John Howard <sirjohnhoward@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> > Rod Speed wrote
> >> lynx <none@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> >>> Krudd was on the news tonite talking about opening
> >>> Australia's windows to let in fresh air! What a wanker!
>
> >> Indeed.
>
> > Yep.
>
> >>> The whole thing makes me puke.
>
> >> You've always been very excitable.
>
> >>> What is this?? government by a leftist think tank!?
>
> >> Nope, its just the usual PR wank. At least the dud did
> >> have enough of a clue to make them pay their own way.
>
> > Or he's a cheapskate.
>
> Why should we be paying for those posturing fools ?
Why do we pay for politicians? All they ever do is raise taxes.
> They didnt produce a damned thing at all except more steaming turds.
Is there any other kind?
> >>> did anyone by any chance come up with the idea of bringing
> >>> John Howard back to run the country? and kicking Krudd out?
>
> >> Unlikely. They're unlikely to have invited anyone like that.
>
> > Brendan Nelson?
>
> Even he aint quite THAT stupid.
You'll get no argument from me.
> And he noticed that the voters wouldnt buy Howard again.
Hey! Give me one more term and I'll prove them wrong.
> >>> That would be the best idea to come out of it!
>
> >> Nope. The voters had got sick of him and had decided
> >> that things were going well enough economy wise that
> >> the risk with the dud was minimal. They're right.
>
> > Only time will tell.
>
> Yep, but it is clear that he didnt lie about being a fiscal
conservative, and
> thats all that it really needs to avoid the sort of stupidity that
****lam produced.
Not to mention Borke, Cheating, etc.
> Too conservative in many ways, it makes absolutely no sense to be trying
> to cut back govt spending as aggressively as they are attempting to do
> with such a magnificent surplus and the economy steaming along so well.
Inflation not a factor?
