The Fraud Of Zionism
By Wilbur Sensor
4-20-8
Most people have been trained to think of Zionism in positive terms. This
is
understandable. Decades of propaganda have misrepresented Zionism as a
progressive, modern force bringing civilization to an arid, uninhabited
wasteland. Such an image is an illusion. This essay will uncover the true
history of Zionism. It will reveal the facts and make clear the real
nature of
the movement.
A MOVEMENT WHICH ASSUMES THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF JEW AND GENTILE
Zionism is an apartheid philosophy. Its founder, Theodore Herzl, was
dismayed
by the mass anti-semitism in France aroused by the Dreyfuss affair. He
became
convinced that the separation of the Jews from the Gentiles by ingathering
all
Jews in a separate Jewish nation was the only solution to the age old
"Jewish
problem". Herzl spelled out his program in his book Der Judenstaat (The
Jewish
State):
"Anti-semitism grows daily, hourly, among the peoples, and must continue
to
grow since its causes continue to exist, and cannot be alienated."
"The causa remota is the loss, in the Middle Ages, of the ability to
assimilate; the cause proxima is our overproduction of middling
intelligences,
that can neither be drained off, nor rise higher-hence, no healthy
draining
off, and no healthy rising to a higher level. Downward, we are being
proletarianized into revolutionaries; we are the subalterns of every
revolutionary party, while at the same time our terrible financial might
grows
upward."
"Will it not be said that I am putting weapons into the hands of the
anti-semites? Why? Because I acknowledge the truth? Because I do not
assert
that there are none but excellent people among us?"
"It is a national question; to resolve it we must, above all, first make
it
into a world political question... We are a people, a people..."
"The Jewish State is a world necessity, hence, it will arise..."
Herzl demands:
"We be given sovereignty over a part of the earth's surface sufficient for
the
rightful requirements of our people; we shall take care of everything else
ourselves."
"No one is strong enough, or rich enough, to move a people from one
dwelling
place to another. Only an idea can do that. The idea of a state may well
have
such force."
"No economic disruptions, no crises, nor persecutions will follow after
the
departing Jews, but rather a period of prosperity will begin for the lands
left behind. An internal migration of Christian citizens into the
positions
surrendered by the Jews takes place. The outlook is gradual, without any
jolt,
and its very beginning is the end of anti-semitism."
"The Jews leave as respected friends. If individual Jews then return,
civilized countries will receive and treat them just as they would treat
the
citizens of any other foreign country."
"This emigration is no flight, but an orderly withdrawal, under the
observation of public opinion. The movement is not only to be organized by
completely legal means, it can, in any case, be accomplished only with the
friendly collaboration of the participating government, which derives
substantial benefit therefrom."
As these paragraphs make clear, to be a Zionist one must believe there is
a
Jewish problem. No Zionist since Herzl has ever repudiated this basic
philosophical premise:
"If we do not admit the rightfulness of anti-semitism, we deny the
rightfulness of our own nationalism. If our people is deserving and
willing to
live its own national life, then it is an alien body that insists on its
own
distinctive identity, reducing the domain of their life. It is right,
therefore, that they should fight against us for their national
integrity....
Instead of establi****ng societies for defense against the anti-semites who
want to reduce our rights, we should establish societies for defense
against
our friends who desire to defend our rights." (Jacob Klatzkin, co-editor
of
the Encylopaedia Judaica)
A MOVEMENT WHICH NEVER TOOK ANY CONGNIZANCE OF THE POPULATION OF THE LAND
IT
COVETED
The Zionists have long maintained the myth, especially in the United
States,
that Palestine was uninhabited before the arrival of the Zionists. This
deception is easily refuted. The British Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon,
writing on October 26, 1917:
"Now what is the capacity as regards population of Palestine within any
reasonable period of time?...What is to become of the people of this
country,
assuming the Turk to be expelled, and the inhabitants not to have been
exterminated by the war? There are over a half a million of these, Syrian
Arabs- a mixed community with Arab, Hebrew, Canaaite, Greek, Egyptian, and
possibly Crusaders' blood. They own the soil, which belongs either to
individual landowners or to village communities. They profess the
Mohammedan
faith. They will not be content either to be expropriated for Jewish
immigrants, or to act merely as hewers of wood and drawers of water to the
latter."
Palestine at the beginning of the Zionist movement was part of the Ottoman
Turkish Empire. Herzl, when he decided to champion a Jewish state in
Palestine, necessarily made overtures to the Sultan on behalf of Zionism.
These negotiations establish that the Zionists were well aware of the
existence of the Palestinian Arabs.
"'When Herzl had spoken of a Charter (from the Sultan) he had not,
needless to
say, contemplated any eviction of the Arabs of Palestine in favor of the
Jews.
He was, to judge from his Congress addresses, hardly aware that Palestine
had
settled inhabitants, and he had, in perfect good faith, omitted the Arabs
from
his calculations.'"( Zionism, Leonard Stein.)
"Was there ever anything more extraordinary than this? Vast plans are made
engaging the destinies of a multitude of people, yet the man who engenders
these plans never takes the essential first step of surveying the land
where
he purposes to carry them out. Nor apparently do any of his associates
suggest
it to him. There might be no Arabs in the world for all the difference it
makes to him or to his associates."
"Year by year Zionist congresses are summoned... Was a single day's
session of
a single Congress devoted to the discussion of the understanding which
must be
reached with the people of Palestine? Not one."
"There were nineteen Jewish colonies established in Palestine before the
year
1900... All these trusts and colonies and the people who inhabited them
were
in regular continuous communication with Jewish bodies and persons
throughout
Europe and America..."
"In a hundred ways the conditions prevailing in Palestine and the
existence of
the Arabs and the varying ways in which the Arabs reacted to existing
colonies
and to the promise of more colonies must have been known to all active
Zionists."
"The only conclusion then, and it is a conclusion forced upon the
observer, is
that if Zionism was unaware of the Arabs it was because most Zionists
perceived an obstacle in the Arabs and did not want to be aware to them.
(Palestine: The Reality, J.M.N. Jeffries, pp. 40-42.)
A MOVEMENT WHICH DISREGARDED PRIOR OBLIGATIONS
Zionism, in addition to coveting someone else's land, has always ignored
the
issue of prior obligations. The Arabs fought as Great Britain's ally in
World
War I against Imperial Germany's ally, Ottoman Turkey. The Arabs were
guaranteed independence in an unified state once the war was won. The
British
pledge of Arab independence was contained in a letter dated October
25,1915 by
Sir Henry McMahon, British High Commissioner in Egypt to Sheriff Hussein
of
Mecca.
"The districts of Mersina and Alexandretta and ****tions of Syria lying to
the
west of the districts of Damascus, hama, homs, and Aleppo cannot be said
to be
purely Arab, and should be excluded from the proposed limits and
boundaries.
With the above modification, and without prejudice to our existing
treaties
with Arab chiefs, we accept these limits and boundaries..."
"Subject to the above modifications, Great Britain is prepared to
recognize
and sup****t the independence of the Arabs within the territories included
in
the limits and boundaries proposed by the Shereef of Mecca." (Palestine:
The
Reality, op. cited,p.76.)
British politicians later pretended that the pledge given by Sir Henry
McMahon
did not include Palestine. They are impeached by a secret Political
Intelligence Department Memorandum on British Commitments to King Hussein.
On
page 9 the Memorandum states:
"With regard to Palestine, His Majesty's Government are committed by Sir
H.
McMahon's letter to the Sherif on the 24th October, 1915 to its inclusion
in
the boundaries of Arab independence."
The Zionist claim to Palestine has always rested on Lord Arthur Balfour's
letter of November 2, 1917 promising British sup****t for a "Jewish
national
homeland" in Palestine. This letter was issued nearly two years after Sir
Henry McMahon's pledge of October 25,1915.
A MOVEMENT WHICH WROTE ITS OWN TITLE
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothchild
"I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's
Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist
aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the cabinet.
"His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine
of a
National home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to
facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood
that
nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights
of
existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political
status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
This do***ent is the grant deed which planted Zionism in the Near East. It
is
the most discreditable do***ent ever issued by a major power. It was
written
by those to whom it was addressed and was the payoff for a shameless
political
manipulation.
The British government did not abandon its pledge to the Arabs because of
altruistic concern for a "Jewish national homeland". The real reason was
stated by David Lloyd George, Britain's wartime Prime Minister:
There is no better proof of the value of the Balfour Declaration as a
military
more than the fact that Germany entered into negotiations with Turkey in
an
endeavor to provide an alternative scheme which would appeal to Zionists.
A
German-Jewish Society, the V.J.O.D. was formed, and in January 1918,
Talaat,
the Turkish Grand Vizier, at the instigation of the Germans, gave vague
promises of legislation by means of which "all justifiable wishes of the
Jews
in Palestine would be able to meet their fulfillment".
"Another most cogent reason for the adoption by the Allies of the policy
of
the Declaration lay in the state of Russia herself. Russian Jews had been
secretly active on behalf of the Central Powers from the first; they had
become the chief agents of German pacifist propaganda in Russia; by 1917
they
had done much in preparing for that general disintegration of Russian
society,
later recognized as the Revolution. It was believed that if Great Britain
declared for the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her
own
pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the
entente."
"It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent
influence
open world Jewry outside Russia, and secure for the entente the aid of
Jewish
financial interests. In America, their aid in this respect would have a
special value when the Allies had almost exhausted the gold and marketable
securities available for American purchase. Such were the chief
considerations
which, in 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract
with
Jewry." (Memoirs of the Peace Conference, David Lloyd George, p. 726.)
The eminent Mr. Lloyd George's opinion is confirmed by numerous other
sources,
especially by Mr. Samuel Landman in his work Great Britain, The Jews and
Palestine, Mr. Landman was a very well known English Zionist whose
positions
included honorary secretary of the Zionist Council of the United Kingdom
in
1912, editor of The Zionist, 1913-1914, solicitor and secretary of the
Zionist
Organization, 1917-1922, and author of several Zionist publications during
World War One. His opinion is thus an official one which is completely
consistent with that of Lloyd George.
"Mr. James A. Malcolm... spontaneously took the initiative, to convince
first
of all Sir Mark Sykes, Under-Secretary to the War Cabinet, and afterwards
M.
Georges-Picot, of the French Embassy in London, and M. Gout of the Quai
d'Orsay (Eastern Section), that the best and perhaps the only way (which
proved so to be) to induce the American President to come into the War was
to
secure the co-operation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and
thus
enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of Zionist
Jews
in America and elsewhere in favor of the Allies on a quid pro quo contract
basis..."
"The Balfour Declaration, in the words of Prof. H.M.V. Temperley, was a
'definite contract between the British Government and Jewry' (History of
the
Peace Conference in Paris, vol 6, p.173). The main consideration given by
the
Jewish people (represented at the time by the leaders of the Zionist
Organization) was their help in bringing President Wilson to the aid of
the
Allies." (Great Britain, The Jews and Palestine, pp.3-6.)
Thus, according to the do***ented statements of both parties the British
betrayed their war time ally, the Arabs, in deference to Zionist
manipulation
in bringing the U.S. into the war on Britains side.
The Balfour declaration was not written by British Foreign Secretary
Arthur
James Balfour. It was written by American and English Zionists on both
sides
of the Atlantic. Many versions were prepared, discarded and rewritten
before
the final version was submitted to Lord Balfour to be issued in his name.
English politicians, such as Lord Robert Cecil, made minor emendations to
the
letter which their Zionist "professors" wrote for them. The Covenant of
the
League of Nations which provided the international legal basis for
establi****ng a British protectorate, or "Mandate" over Palestine was
largely
written by the Zionist agent, South African general Jan Smuts. The
drafting of
the language of the actual Mandate was written by U.S. Zionist and Harvard
Law
Professor Felix Frankfurter at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919.
A MOVEMENT WHICH MADE FALSE PROMISES OF EQUAL TREATMENT
The false promises of equal treatment for the Arabs are to be found in the
Balfour declaration itself. This declaration was produced by many hands
over
many months with deception as its deliberate objective.
"This too, memorable do***ent is not so much a sentence of English as a
verbal
mosaic. Drafts for it traveled back and forth, within England or over the
Ocean, to be scrutinized by some two score draftsmen half co-operating,
half
competing with one another, who erased this phrase or adopted that after
much
thought. At long last, out of the store of their rejections and of their
acceptances the final miscellany was chosen, ratified and fixed. There
never
has been a proclamation longer prepared, more carefully produced, more
consciously worded."
Whatever is to be found in the Balfour Declaration was put into it
deliberately. There are no accidents in that text. If there is any
vagueness
in it this is an intentional vagueness.
"....this nationally issued and nationally endorsed do***ent was nothing
but a
calmly planned piece of deception." (Palestine: The Reality, J.M.N.
Jeffries,
pp.)
The entire Balfour Declaration cannot here be analyzed. A few
illustrations of
its deceptive character will suffice.
"...it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may
prejudice
the civil and religious nights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine..."
"At the time of the Balfour Declaration the population of Palestine was
90%
Arab and 10% Jew.
"Before this unpalatable reality, what did the framers of the Balfour
Declaration do? By an altogether abject subterfuge, under colour of
protecting
Arab interests, they set out to conceal the fact that the Arabs to all
intents
constituted the population of the country. It called them the 'non-Jewish
communities in Palestine'! It called the multitude the non-few; it called
the
670,000 the non-60,000; out of a hundred it called the 91 the non-9. You
might
just as well call the British people 'the non-Continental communities in
Great
Britain'. It would be as suitable to define the mass of working men as
'the
non-idling communities in the world,' or the healthy as the "non-bedridden
elements amongst sleepers,' or the sane as 'the non-lunatic section of
thinkers' - or the grass of the countryside as 'the non-dandelion ****tion
of
the pastures'." (ibid, pp. 177-178.)
"The crux arrives with 'civil rights'. What are 'civil rights'? All turns
on
this point. If civil rights remain undefined it is only a mockery to
guarantee
them. To guarantee anything, and at the same time not to let anyone know
what
it is, that is Alice in Wonderland legislation. 'I guarantee your civil
rights', said the White Queen to Alice in Palestineland. 'Oh, thank you!'
said
Alice, 'what are they, please?' 'I'm sure I can't tell you, my dear,' said
the
White Queen, 'but I'll guarantee very hard.'" (ibid, p.179)
As soon as the Zionists set up shop in Palestine they made clear the real
relation****p of Jew to Arab. The formal government authority in Palestine,
1918-1920, was rested in the British Military Government. A competing, and
in
fact superior form of government existing side by side the British
Military
Government was the Zionist Commission. The attitude of the British
Military
Government and of the native Arab population was summed up by Sir Louis
Bols:
"It will be recognized from the foregoing that my own authority and that
of
every department of my Administration is claimed or impinged upon by the
Zionist Commission, and I am definitely of opinion that this state of
affairs
cannot continue without grave danger to the public peace and to the
prejudice
of my Administration."
"It is no use saying to the Moslem and Christian elements of the
population
that our declaration as to the maintenance of the status quo on our entry
into
Jerusalem has been deserved. Facts witness otherwise: the introduction of
the
Hebrew tongue as an official language; the setting up of a Jewish
judicature
the whole fabric of Government of the Zionist Commission, of which they
are
well aware; the special traveling privileges to members of the Zionist
Commission; these have firmly and absolutely convinced the non-Jewish
elements
of our partiality. On the other hand, the Zionist Commission accuses me
and my
officers of anti-Zionism. The situation is intolerable, and in justice to
my
officers and myself must be fairly faced."
"This Administration has loyally earned out the wishes of His Majesty's
Government, and has succeeded in so doing by strict adherence to the laws
governing the conduct of the Military Occupant of Enemy Territory, but
this
has not satisfied the Zionists, who appear bent on committing the
tem****ary
Military Administration to a partialist policy before the issue of the
Mandate. It is manifestly impossible to please partisans who politically
claim
nothing more than a "National Home", but in reality will be satisfied with
nothing less than a Jewish State and all that it politically implies."
"I recommend therefore, in the interests of peace, of development, of the
Zionists themselves, that the Zionist Commission in Palestine be
abolished."
(ibid,p.359)
A MOVEMENT WHICH DISCARDED ITS OWN SPONSOR
The British Mandate existed only to protect the incoming Zionists from the
native Arabs. Mr. Vladimir Jabotinsky makes this clear in his 1923 title
The
Iron Wall (We and the Arabs):
"Zionist colonization must either be terminated or carried out against the
wishes of the native population. This colonization can, therefore, be
continued and make progress only under the protection of a power
independent
of the native population - an iron wall, which will be in a position to
resist
the pressure to the native population. This is, in toto, our policy
towards
the Arabs... A voluntary reconciliation with the Arabs is out of the
question
either now or in the future."
"If you wish to colonize a land in which people are already living, you
must
provide a garrison for the land, or find some 'rich man' or benefactor who
will provide a garrison on your behalf. Or else-or else, give up your
colonization, for without an armed force which will render physically
impossible any attempt to destroy or prevent this colonization,
colonization
is impossible, not "difficult', not 'dangerous', but IMPOSSIBLE!...Zionism
is
a colonization adventure and therefore it stands or falls by the question
of
armed force. It is im****tant.... to speak Hebrew, but, unfortunately, it
is
even more im****tant to be able to shoot - or else I am through with
playing at
colonizing."
The British soon realized what a grave problem they had created for
themselves
by sponsoring Zionism in Palestine. The Arab riots of 1920, 1921, 1929 and
1936-39 brought one British investigating commission after another to
Palestine, all reaching the same conclusion - the cause of unrest in
Palestine
was massive Jewish immigration into a land already inhabited by Arabs.
In 1937 a Royal Investigating Commission headed by Lord Peel concluded
that
the proper solution to Jewish-Arab tension was to partition Palestine,
creating a Jewish state, an Arab state and a British maintained "Polish
Corridor" dividing the two. The Zionists reluctantly accepted the
partition
proposal but the Arabs did not. From this point on the British had
outlived
their usefulness to the Zionists.
In 1944 the terrorist underground Jewish group, the Irgun Zvai Leumi,
began a
partisan war to drive the British out of Palestine. The many bloody
misdeeds
of this group included assassinating British Soldiers, raiding British
military depots, assassinating the British High Commissioner in Egypt,
dynamiting the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, etc. until the British
finally
quit Palestine on May 15, 1948.
A MOVEMENT WHICH COLLABORATED WITH THE AVOWED ENEMY OF ALL JEWS
Zionism was founded on the mutual incompatibility of Jew and Gentile. As
such
it had a built in incentive for collaborating with another ideology built
on
the incompatibility of Jew and Gentile - Nazism.
Zionist collaboration with National Socialism dates almost from the
inception
of the Hitler regime. The Ha'avara, or Transfer Agreement dates from May,
1933. Under this arrangement approximately 10% or 50-60,000 of Germany's
500-600,000 Jews were sent to Palestine with their assets minus an exit
tax.
This fulfilled the Zionist desire to reroute Jews to Palestine while
promoting
the Nazi desire to rid Germany of Jewish influence.
Zionism enjoyed the official favoritism of the Hitler government. Numerous
articles praising Zionism appeared in the German press. Dr. Joseph
Goebbels,
Reich Propaganda Minister, commissioned a special medallion commemorating
Zionism. The Zionist blue and white flag was the only national symbol
permitted to fly in Germany other than the swastika. More im****tantly,
special
Zionist training camps existed in Germany to train German Jews for
agricultural work in Palestine.
On at least one occasion, Chaim Weizmann the future first president of
Israel
vetoed the Rublee-Schact plan of January, 1939 which would have removed
all
Jews from Germany within a five year period. Weizmanns reason for so
doing? He
felt it was preferable to leave the Jews under German control so that they
could later be sent to Palestine, rather that allow them to choose their
own
destination. In this regard Weizmann endorsed the thinking of his
political
rival, David Ben-Gurion:
"If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Germany
by
bringing them over to England, and only half of them by trans****ting them
to
Eretz Yisrael, then I would opt for the second alternative. For we must
weigh
not only the life of these children, but also the history of the People of
Israel." (Yoar-Gelber, Zionist Policy and the Fate of European Jewry
(1939-42), Yad Vashem Studies, vol. XII,p.199.)
A MOVEMENT WHICH REJECTS INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION BUT WHICH DEMANDS
INTERNATIONAL OBEDIENCE
Zionism has never rested on consent, either of the Arabs of Palestine, of
the
influential English Jewish community which opposed it when first proposed
or
of the occasional gentile politician who warned of its dangers. Zionism
has
always demanded "Bow Down Before Me"!
Zionism ignored the British White Papers urging restriction of Jewish
immigration to Palestine, it has ignored the United Nations resolutions on
return of conquered territories, it continues to ignore the settlements on
the
West Bank of the Jordan river.
Zionism will never become a democratic movement because it is a doctrine
of
divine right. It is rooted in blood, mysticism and return to the soil.
Zionism has forged its case. It has used deceit, broken promises, backroom
diplomacy, violence, blackmail and terrorism to achieve its ends. It has
slept
with the Devil while posing as an angel.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
|
