Olympic torch relay in Canberra (withremoved public and run by police
officers) is clear demonstration of Australian (Chineese, Russian,Cuban)
model of mocked democracy.
Exiled Tibetan leaders say more than 150 people have been killed in nearly
a month of unrest in Tibet and other areas of China. Tibetans are
protesting at what they say is nearly six decades of repression under
Chinese rule.
China insists its security forces have killed no one while trying to quell
the protests. It says Tibetan "rioters'' killed 20 people.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/beijing2008/professional-spoilers-filled-with-hate-gosper/2008/04/08/1207420368388.html
Kevan Gosper, who is a member of the IOC commission advising Beijing on
staging the August Olympics, also described the protesters as
"professional spoilers'' who had no regard for the efforts made by China
to prepare for the Games. The truth is that Australian olympians are drug
filled puppets retiring in bad health when old 20 years and using
self-propelled swimming suits to steal medals.
Dangerous freemuson KevanGosper is best known for fraud family holidays
organised for hos family befora Salt Lake City Olympics. (Lodge cover-up:
"Kevan Gosper says his family's integrity is intact this morning following
the decision by the IOC ethics commission to clear him of any misconduct
over the Salt Lake City bid. The head of the ethics commission has also
described last week's torch relay controversy as an error of judgement on
Mr Gosper's part, but it's taken no further action on the matter").
http://www.abc.net.au/am/stories/s126990.htm
The independent New York lawyer was asked by the ethics commission to
examine two vacations taken by the Gosper family in Salt Lake City, one in
1993 and the other in 1995, after allegations were made earlier this year
that suggested the Gospers may have been among those who'd suc***bed to
the inducements offered by the notorious Salt Lake City bid team. Mr
Lipton said the do***entary evidence he's examined proved the Gospers were
the victims of what he called the concealment used by the Salt Lake City
team. Whatever gifts Mrs Gosper received would appear to be normal
expenses anyone could expect to be borne by a friend, he said. She had no
idea that those expenses were being picked up by the bid committee. And Mr
Gosper had no idea that the $275 he paid per night for ski lodge
accommodation was nowhere near the true cost of nearly $1 400 a night.
KevanGosper attracted controversy in the run up to the 2000 Olympics in
Sydney when he organised for his daughter to run part of the Olympic Torch
relay in place of a girl representing the Australian-Greek community who
was originally scheduled to run. More recently he has been accused of
being an "apologist for dictators" after his criticism of pro-democracy
protesters during the Beijing 2008 torch relay. He was recently suggested
that during the Olympic Torch Australian appearance Chinese para-military
torch attendants could be called into action if Australian police were
unable to coup with potential protests. His remarks prompted a swift
rebuke from Attorney-General Robert McClelland.
There are also re****ts today that up to 10,000 Chinese sup****ters could
descend on Canberra to defend the torch on the day of the relay. Can law
enforcement agencies cope with that number of people or do we need to
bring in the army as the Chinese have actually requested in the past.
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2008/s2218157.htm
All Christians should condemned this pagan IDOL wor****ping invented to
promote Nazi-
freemasonary international conspiracy:
http://ioccorruption.blogspot.com/
“The (Revival of the modern) so called modern "Olympic" Games have become
a
grotesque jamboree of international hypocrisy. Whatever idealism they once
had has been lost. The so called modern "Olympic" Games now stand for some
of the things which are most rotten and corrupt in the modern world, for
prestige, nationalism, publicity, prejudice, bureaucracy, and the
exploitation of talent”
“The so called modern "Olympic" Games have been taken over by a vulgar
nationalism, in place of the spirit of internationalism for which they
were
revived”
“..the objectives of many national so called "Olympic" programmes is the
glorification and self-assertion of totalitarian state regimes,” often
“vile regimes guilty of many of the crimes which the so called modern
"Olympic" Games are supposed to outlaw”.
Sir William Rees - Mogg
If you want to know how the Olympic torch really began its "Journey of
Harmony," as the Chinese call its current relay, if you want to see
why the torch has had to pass through a human obstacle course composed
of protesters, SWAT teams and police in San Francisco, Paris and
London, then do not look to Tibet's grievances against China. Look to
the opening of Leni Riefenstahl's 1938 film, "Olympia."
In that homage to Berlin's 1936 Olympic Games the origins of this
ritual are revealed. Never before had a lighted torch been relayed
from a Greek temple in Olympia to an athletic competition, let alone
by thousands of runners trying to keep it from being extinguished.
So Riefenstahl creates the myth the Greeks never got around to
telling, creating a filmic counterpart to the opening of Wagner's
"Ring," in which an entire world gradually emerges from elemental
fragments. The camera begins by surveying a misty landscape of ruins,
of shattered pillars and overgrown gr*****. Restless and circling, the
camera reveals a Greek temple standing amid the stones. Heads and the
bodies of Greek statues appear in an eerie *****c landscape. Under the
sensuous caresses of Riefenstahl's lens, a ****d discus thrower comes
to life, polished stone becoming muscular flesh. Another athlete
prepares to throw a javelin, its trajectory leading toward a bowl of
fire. Lighting the Olympic torch, another **** acolyte triumphantly
raises it aloft like Wagner's Siegfried displaying his sword.
Humanity is given its purpose; the relay begins. The torch is conveyed
from one bearer to the next and ends in Berlin at a 110,000-seat
stadium where it ignites an altar of flame. Through ****mmering heat
the sun itself can be seen, vibrating in sympathy. And Hitler salutes
the cheering crowds.
This passing of the torch thus demonstrates a lineage of inheritance --
a historical relay -- making Nazi Germany the living heir to Ancient
Greece. A claim was being staked.
This claim was not unrelated to the very existence of the Olympic
games. As Nigel Spivey shows in his book "The Ancient Olympics," many
different traditions, myths and cults fed the Greek games. But the
founding of the modern Olympics was far more straightforward. A German
scholar, J .J. Winckelmann (1717-1768) proposed excavating Olympia,
the ancient site of the Greek games; the honor was eventually left to
a 19th-century German scholar, Ernst Curtius.
It was a Frenchman, however, Baron Pierre de Coubertin, who founded
the modern international Olympics with the first games in 1896,
explicitly declaring that the French should reconstitute what the
Germans had exhumed. The implied rivalry was more bloodily enacted in
the battlefield beginning in 1914, two years before Germany was
supposed to host the games for the first time.
Then, after its defeat, Germany was banned from the Olympics in 1920
and 1924. So hosting the games in Berlin in 1936 was a kind of
restitution, like the one the Nazis sought on a grander scale, undoing
the humiliating post-World War I penalties. (Germany had also just
remilitarized the Rhineland.) But Hitler wanted the torch fully in
German hands. He authorized a resumption of German excavations at
Olympia while an organizer of the 1936 games, Carl Diem, came up with
the idea of the relay.
"In 1940," Hitler told the Nazi architect Albert Speer, "the Olympic
Games will take place in Tokyo. But thereafter they will take place in
Germany for all time to come." Speer was to build a 400,000-seat
stadium in Nuremberg as the Olympics' permanent home. (An exhibition
about the 1936 games will open at the United States Holocaust Memorial
Museum on April 25.)
The International Olympic Committee, of course, offers a slightly
different account of the torch relay. (See multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/
en_re****t_655.pdf.) The Olympic Museum in Lausanne, Switzerland,
explains that the torch alludes to the "positive values that Man has
always associated with fire," its relay transmitting "a message of
peace and friend****p amongst peoples." But the Olympics still
preserves the self-loving aura of the Nazi myth.
White-robed priestesses in the ruined temple of Hera (all actresses of
course) light the torch using focused rays of the sun; backup flames
insure that the fire's lineage remains intact in case the main torch
is tem****arily extinguished (as it was this year). "The purity of the
flame," the Olympics brochure piously explains, "is guaranteed by the
way it is lit using the sun's rays."
It was partly in opposition to such feti****stic reverence that in
1956, as the torch made its way to the games in Melbourne, Australia,
a student interloper made a model out of a chair leg and a plum-
pudding can stuffed with a burning pair of underpants and solemnly
presented the flaming symbol to the mayor of Sydney. But more recently
the relay has needed no help in attaining kitsch and stunt. In 1976
the flame was used to send an electronic pulse by satellite from
Athens to Ottawa, where a programmed laser lighted a torch. In 1996
the passing of the flame took place between two parachute jumpers. In
2000 a flaming torch (presumably protected) was carried under water at
the Great Barrier Reef.
Now, despite China's attempt to put a smiley face on the torch relay --
"Light the Passion, Share the Dream" says the Chinese Web site (see
torchrelay.beijing2008.cn/en) -- the Tibetan protests have laid bare
its nationalist essence. There are reasons why the Chinese wanted a
route that invoked glory (by touching Everest's peak) and power (by
passing through Taiwan).
Of course in 1936 the relay reflected a more ominous threat. The torch
was carried through Salonika, Greece; Sofia, Bulgaria; Belgrade,
Yugoslavia; Budapest; and Vienna, and was welcomed along the way not
by extensive protests but with pro-Nazi demonstrations. A prescient
editorial in The New York Times, sensing the drumbeats of war, called
the torch's route a "strategic highway" that traced the line of the
German "Drang Nach Osten" -- the drive to the East that the Kaiser
sought in the First World War, and which Hitler was soon to put into
practice.
Since then the torch's routes, like the games themselves, have
regularly been subject to disruption and conflict. The defense of the
Olympic enterprise is that the universal ideals of good s****tsman****p
and fair-mindedness provide a means to transcend national difference.
But the history suggests that sentimentality is being slathered over
rituals and practice that proclaim something quite different.
The Greeks themselves were more forthright. They believed, Mr. Spivey
suggests, that "all games were war games." At a conference at Yale
this month about Greek "hoplite" warfare -- in which a wide array of
Greek citizenry supposedly maneuvered together in vast, linked
phalanxes -- one hypothesis was that this reflected a revolutionary
view of an interconnected citizenry. In this light all war games also
became social games. At any rate all games were as serious as war, and
none were about the brotherhood of all mankind.
INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE - I.O.C
“the wor****p of professionally abnormal muscular development
"THE idolatry COR****ATION"
"to which ordinary life is sacrificed"
“in which good values are taken by dishonest men and put to shameful uses”
in which ...
“The Lausane administration is politically influenced and morally
bankrupt”
in which ...
“the international bureaucracies of several I.S.F.'s
have become among the most odious of the world”
in which ...
"threats by countries to boycott the flame of Olympia and the "Games" have
time and
again made it a political arena akin to the United Nations.
I.O.C from a legal entity, a non for profit non governmental organization,
developed as an
institution chartered by the nations of the world to carry out specific
public functions
based on the ancient greek olympic ideals of free fair play and real game.
I.O.C. as a modern, profit-driven cor****ation
can be compared to that of a
clinically diagnosed
psychopath.
a.. callous unconcern for the feelings of others,
b.. incapacity to maintain enduring relation****ps,
c.. reckless disregard for the safety of others,
d.. deceitfulness (repeated lying to and deceiving of others for
profit),
e.. incapacity to experience guilt and failure to conform to the social
norms with respect to lawful behaviors
The social responsibility of the I.O.C
is to increase its profits
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
When I hear IOC marketers speak eloquently about the "social
responsibilities of I.O.C. in the institution of the revived so called
modern "Olympic" Games, I am reminded of the wonderful line about an
ancient
greek "reator" who discovered at the age of 70 that he had been speaking
prose all his life at "agora".
The I.O.C. businessmen believe that they are defending free fair true
original values and ideals of the Greek ancient Olympic Games when they
declaim that I.O.C is not concerned "merely" with profit but also with
promoting desirable "social" ends; that I.O.C. has a "social conscience"
and
takes seriously its responsibilities for providing dopping control,
employment, services to athletes, eliminating discrimination, protecting
environment and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contem****ary
crop
of reformers. In fact they are–or would be if they or anyone else took
them
seriously–preaching pure and unadulterated socialism.
I.O.C top executives and members who talk this way are unwitting puppets
of
the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free
society these past decades.
The discussions of the "social responsibilities of the I.O.C" are notable
for their analytical looseness and lack of rigor. What does it mean to say
that "I.O.C. " has responsibilities? Only people can have
responsibilities.
I.O.C. is an artificial person and in this sense may have artificial
responsibilities, but "SUCH A COR****ATION" as a whole cannot be said to
have
responsibilities, even in this vague sense. The first step toward clarity
in
examining the doctrine of the social responsibility of I.O.C is to ask
precisely what it implies for whom.
Presumably, the individuals who are to be responsible are I.O.C. managers,
which means individual proprietors or I.O.C executives. Most of the
discussion of social responsibility is directed at cor****ations such as
I.O.C, so in what follows I shall mostly neglect the individual
proprietors
and speak of I.O.C. executives.
In I.O.C, a top executive is an employee of the owners of the I.O.C. He
has direct responsibility to his employers. That responsibility is to
conduct the I.O.C. business in accordance with their desires, which
generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to
the
basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied
in
ethical custom. Of course, in some cases his employers may have a
different
objective.
In I.O.C. a group of persons is suppossed that established in 1896 the
revival of an ancient hellenic institution the " OLYMPIC GAMES OF ANCIENT
OLYMPIA" IN GREECE, for a NOT FOR PROFIT IDEALISTIC mission and purpose.
The
manager of a such international N.G.O / N.F.P.O will not have money profit
as his objective but the rendering of certain services. But since Los
Angeles 1984 games, the key point is that, in his capacity as a I.O.C.
executive, is the agent of the individuals who own the I.O.C. , not the
greek establishers of the ancient greek institution of the Olympic Games,
neither the greek revivers of the modern revived version of the 1896 first
modern olympiad, (such as Dimitrios Vikelas). Thus, a primary
responsibility
of the I.O.C. manager is to the I.O.C owners.
Needless to say, this does not mean that it is easy to judge how well the
I.O.C manager is performing his task. But at least the criterion of
performance is straightforward, and the persons among whom a voluntary
contractual arrangement exists are clearly defined.
Of course, the I.O.C. executive is also a person in his own right. As a
person, he may have many other responsibilities that he recognizes or
assumes voluntarily–to his family, his conscience, his feelings of
charity,
his church, his clubs, his city, his country. He may feel impelled by
these
responsibilities to devote part of his income to causes he regards as
worthy, to refuse to work for particular corporations, even to leave his
job, for example, to join his country's armed forces. If we wish, we may
refer to some of these responsibilities as "social responsibilities." But
in
these respects he is acting as a principal, not an agent; he is spending
his
own money or time or energy, not the money of his employers or the time or
energy he has contracted to devote to their purposes. If these are "social
responsibilities," they are the social responsibilities of individuals,
not of the I.O.C. business.
What does it mean to say that the I.O.C. executive has a "social
responsibility" in his capacity as I.O.C businessman? If this statement
is
not pure rhetoric, it must mean that he is to act in some way that is not
in
the interest of his I.O.C. employers.
For example, that he is to refrain from decreasing the United States
Olympic
Committe's % share of the "olympic media or sponsors rights" pie profit in
order to fairlly re-allocate the money share and to contribute to the
social
objective of developing small poor african Olympic Committees, even though
if that re-allocation of money would not be in the best interests of the
I.O.C owners or some of it's major traditional members.
Or that he is to make expenditures on increasing dopping control beyond
the
"amount" that is in the best interests of the I.O.C sponsors or that is
required by law in order to contribute to the social objective of
improving
"drug free fair play" Olympic Games.
Or that, at the expense of I.O.C profits, he is to hire "Olympic
specialists" or qualified available s****ts managers, doctors,
sociologists,
historians, philosophers, instead of, Samaranch Junior, or sons of the 3rd
generation relatives of african middle east or european kings or princes,
to contribute with a "tacit knowledge" workforce to the social and ethical
objective of olympic ideals and the olympic charter.
In each of these cases, the I.O.C. executive would be spending someone
else's money for a general social interest and the olympic ideals.
Insofar as his actions in accord with his "social responsibility" reduce
returns to I.O.C. "shareholders", he is spending their money!
Insofar as his actions he distribute the money to the small african poor
Olympic Committees, he is spending the share of , U.S.O.C. BRITISH OLYMPIC
COMMITTE, GERMAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, CANADIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, SPANISH
OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, FRENCH OLYMPIC COMMMITTEE, ITALIAN OLYMPIC COMMITTEE
etc., money!
Insofar as his actions lower the wages of some I.O.C members, he is
spending
their money.
The shareholders, or the small AFRICAN olympic committies or the poor
athletes themselves could separately spend their own money on the
particular
action if they wished to do so.
The I.O.C executive is exercising a distinct "social responsibility,"
rather
than serving as an agent of the shareholders, or the I.O.C members, or the
BIG 7 N.O.C.s, only if he spends the money in a different way than they
would have spent it.
But if he does this, he is in effect imposing taxes, on behalf of the
I.O.C.
as an NON FOR PROFIT / NON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION, on the one hand, and
deciding how the tax proceeds shall be spent, on the other. ( A good
example
is the business operations of I.O.C and the top sponsors in China -
Vancouver - London - Sochi - Singapure - I.O.C Lausane operates "free of
tax" in China Beijing through O.C.O.G 2008 )
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
|
