Mohammed Burns In Hell wrote:
> Islamic Terrorism is more dangerous than the Communism of the last
Century
>
> Syed Kamran Mirza
>
> A friend of mine has forwarded an article from Wa****ngton post written
> by Mr. Zbigniew Brzezinski the renown American foreign policy expert,
> and the theme of his article was: Is the Communism and Islamic
> terrorism has anything in common? More precisely, he has stated in his
> article with firm voice that the 'Islamic terrorists are much weaker
> than communism' hence the west should not take Islamic terrorists so
> seriously!
>
> Quite frankly, I do not agree with Mr. Brzezinski's opinion on
> several im****tant points of his article which has delved the most
> im****tant political issues of this 21st century. Mr. Brzezinski is a
> famous US foreign policy expert and was the security advisor to the
> American President Jimmy Carter. He was perhaps one of the key persons
> responsible for creating Osama Bin Laden (the Frankenstein of American
> foreign politics) in the 80's by his relentless campaign and ardently
> teaching of Islamic jihad. By the help of Saudi Islamic crooks he
> recruited thousands of young Arab jihadis, gave them jihadi training,
> weapons, money and other logistic sup****ts to fight the Communism
> (USSR). And now he thinks Islamic terrorism is not as dangerous as
> Communism of the past. It is only out of ignorance of Islamic zealotry
> that Mr. Brzezinski's is making such absurd comments. However, with
> due respect to Mr. Brezezinski below are my comments against his
> opinions.
>
> In my view, if Communism was a thousand pounds Gorilla; then the
> Islamic terrorism is a ten thousand pounds Gorilla. Communism might
> have had Nukes to destroy the entire planet; but the communists did not
> dare to even touch one single hair of America (anywhere in the whole
> world) during 50 years of cold war because it feared retaliation. On
> the other hand, these devilish ideologically brainwashed Islamic
> terrorists have already destroyed over a dozen of American
> Embassies/installations overseas, have killed many hundreds of American
> abroad, have destroyed the American war****ps and the American Army
> installations in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; (By the way all these
> happened during the reign of two Democratic Presidents: Carter and
> Clinton) and finally have destroyed the pride of America WTC, and the
> Pentagon right here in the soil of America-killing over three
> thousand innocent Americans.
>
> All the above terrorisms happened before the Iraq war. For fifty years
> Communism made thousands of Nukes but did not have a single suicide
> bomber. The Islamic terrorism counts with thousands of suicide bombers
> which are more practical and more efficient than Nukes.
>
> These deadly human bombs are indiscriminately blasting and killing
> innocent civilians throughout the world. Can Mr. Brzezinski still claim
> that Communism was stronger than Islamic terrorism? Mr. Brezezinski
> must be kidding! [Was the mighty communism at all capable of giving
> such apocalyptic scenery (above) of the destruction of American
> property right in the heart of America ? ]
>
> Just to refute Mr. Brzezinski's inaccurate comparison of communism
> with Islamic terrorism, let me cite a few unparallel examples: To quell
> the monster of Islamic terrorism , America has already fought and still
> is fighting two major wars (Afghanistan and Iraq) spending tens of
> thousands of human lives and hundreds of billions of dollars as well;
> overhauled many US administrative strategies; created a brand new
> Homeland Security Department, many other security arrangements
> worldwide, federal Air marshal etc. spending hundreds of billions of
> dollars. To handle the communist threat America did not have to do a
> fraction of that. Yet the control of Islamic terrorism is not in the
> sight at all.
>
> Like many other (Democrats and leftists) naive Americans, Mr.
> Brzezinski does not know Islam not the zealotry of its followers. He
> thing just because the Islamic terrorists do not have a strong
> organization as the communists did, they are weak, vulnerable and are
> not a great threat! Fact is, these Islamic terrorists actually do not
> have any home or country or any geographical boundary. They are
> everywhere all over the world including America , and they are like
> shadow which can not be seen before they blast their deadly bombs.
> Islamic terrorists have one common home which is the religion of Islam
> and they get their instructions from the Quran. They are brainwashed
> and solidly bonded by this deadly ideology. Islamic terrorists are more
> dangerous and more powerful because of their fanatical faith and
> because they have no home and can't be targeted, than the communist
> that had an identifiable home and organization having only a loosely
> bonded political theme. Had the Islamic terrorists got any particular
> home or geographical identity, then it would have been very easy for a
> super power like America to destroy it completely. Unfortunately, that
> is not the case with Islamic terrorism.
>
> Like Mr. Brzezinski, President George Bush and British PM Tony Blair
> also thought initially that Islam/religion was not the factor, or those
> terrorists are not bonded with the Islamic ideology. They both
> initially said "Islam is peace". But now with time they both have
> been educated well about this menacing threat. Now they are uttering
> the correct adjectives about these Islamic terrorists. The "murderous
> ideology of the Islamic radicals", "Islamic radicalism,"
> "militant jihadism", "Islamofascism", or "Islamic
>
> Caliphate" are the right words for President Bush and PM Blair to use
> for describing Islamic terrorists. Before, they both used to tell all
> wrong things about the Islamic terrorists. Because, it has been proven
> time and again by actions and figures that Islamic terrorism is indeed
> connected and greatly emboldened by the murderous ideology of Islam.
>
> Mr. Brzezinski's another naïve theory is that-it's the
> "poverty and oppression" that is creating suicide bombers, and not
> Islam. He is wrong here too. So far Islamists blasted hundreds of
> suicide bombs. Not a single case was proven that they did it because of
> oppressions. I have followed every news about these suicide bombers,
> and read several dozens of articles about those captured would be
> suicide bombers (around the world) who were interviewed by various
> re****ters. Almost all of them vividly and proudly told the re****ters
> that they have done it by religious motivations/convictions, and wanted
> to become martyrs. None of them said that they did it because of any
> oppression or due to poverty. They all wanted to enter Islamic lustful
> heaven by killing innocent human beings. All those Nineteen 9/11
> terrorists who destroyed WTC and Pentagon were from affluent rich and
> educated Arab families, and they were all University graduates. They
> all left the messages behind that they did it to go to heaven to enjoy
> 72 virgin houris. Please mind that poverty also do exist in India ,
> China , and many other countries of Africa and Asia . Those poor
> Hindus, poor Buddhists, or poor Christians, Animists or poor Pagans do
> not commit suicide bombings to kill kaffirs. Only Muslims do it.
> Therefore, it is Islam (religion) the cause, and not any poverty or
> oppressions. Communism could not create a single suicide bomber to kill
> any capitalists. But the deadly ideology of Islam can create tens of
> thousands of suicide bombers world wide.
>
> Please consider the case of Bangladesh today. In Bangladesh Islamic
> terrorist are blasting deadly bombs everywhere killing innocent peoples
> almost on daily basis. All those involved in these killings are
> Islamists (Madrassa students, Madrassa teachers, muftis, maoulanas,
> Imams, etc.). The poor Bengalis beggars will never commit suicide to
> kill people even if the beggars are starving for several weeks, unless
> they are fanatically brainwashed by heavenly bait of Islam. Mind you no
> human wants to die even for billion dollars; but he will die for a
> cause.
>
> It's absolutely incorrect to claim that major religious figures
> condemned Islamic terrorism. Pope may have done it but not grand mufti
> of Saudi Arabia or any other Islamic big mullah. Not even 2% Islamic
> mullahs of the entire world did condemn Islamic terrorism. Their
> condemnation has the deceitful tactics of fooling the western world.
> They may condemn terrorism (only externally), but never condemn
> jihadist Islamists. Actually they call it jihad; how they can condemn
> jihad? Could they go against the Quran? Virtually all the Muslims from
> Madrassas, Mosques, Islamic centers vehemently sup****t Osama bin Laden
> and his Islamic terrorist's gang whole heartedly. Even the so called
> moderate or ignorant Muslims do sup****t (clandestinely) Osama's grand
> mission of fighting the west.
>
> Mr. Brzezinski's analogy of IRA terrorism with Islamic terrorism is
> another sign of naivety and lack of understanding of the real problem
> of Islamic terrorism. IRA terrorism in Northern Ireland or Basque
> terrorism in Spain is purely local in nature and their struggle is not
> to establish or safeguard Christianity or any other religion. IRA or
> Basque people never blasted their bombs in Indonesia , Philipine,
> Tunesia or in America . Most im****tantly, IRA and Basque terrorists did
> not commit suicide bombings. Islamic terrorists are blasting suicide
> bombs all over the world. What kind of analogy is it?
>
> This Islamic utopia was started after the rise of Islamic regime in
> Iran after the fall of the Shah of Iran. Osama bin Laden saw the
> victory over USSR in Afghan war as the victory of Islam over the enemy
> of Islam-the Russian infidels. He has definitely considered it as the
> victory of Islam by the Allah's divine inspirational assistance and
> never considered American superior weapons/technology any real factor
> for this victory over Russian Communists. Apparently this was the
> pivotal spiritually inspirational mindset of Osama bin Laden (according
> to his famous "fatwa of Osama bin Laden" published after 9/11)
> which has aroused the divine passions of his chosen al-Qaeda jihadis
> with the dream of establi****ng an Islamic Caliphate throughout the
> entire world, as per the dictum of holy Qur'an.
>
> Therefore, prime and ultimate driving force behind the present Islamic
> terrorist's utopia is Islam and religious zeal, and not the poverty.
> Unless the west understands the ultimate cause of this madness, in way
> it can defeat this terrorist monster. This is not the time of
> critiquing or debating why America has gone to Iraq . This is the time
> to unite and find the way to win this Iraq war-which will leave a
> strong message to those Islamic jihadis al Qaeda, which will definitely
> discourage future recruits of jihadis and will help eva****ate their
> dream of establi****ng Islamic Caliphate.
>
> The dangerous terrorist ideology must be fought in two fronts:
> Militarily and ideologically. West must investigate what lies in
> Islam/Quran that can very easily turn a simple human into a deadly
> bomb. Mr. Brezezinski's absurd theory will do no good. Cutting and
> running from Iraq war leaving the job unfinished will only give the
> jubilant inspirations to those jihadis which will embolden their
> Islamic zeal even further to recruit more jihadis to stage more
> dangerous 9/11 than the one they have already staged in 2001.
>
> If the President Bush listens to Mr. Brzezinski's absurd theme and
> withdraws from Iraq without fini****ng the job, this shortsightedness of
> America will leave a dangerous message to those jihadis dreamers.
> Islamists will declare that they have defeated USSR (one super power)
> in Afghanistan , and defeated the biggest super power America in Iraq .
> And credit all that to the divine help from Allah. This will be a
> devastating defeat for the west and will invite catastrophic terrorisms
> and untold devastations in the entire western world including America .
> There will be no power on earth to stop Islamic/jihadis human bombs
> which will be relentlessly blasting bombs everywhere in the west with
> much Islamic zeal and a great passion of establi****ng Islamic caliphate
> as per Quranic predications by Allah. This will lead to the third world
> war which may destroy our entire civilization.
>
> http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/skm51222.htm
>
>
>
HOW TO BECOME A ****SKIN MOSLEM - this is how: **** goats, **** your
mother (nikomak), molest children, wear a beekeepers outfit all the
time, never shower or bath, beat your wives, learn terrorist activities
at a maddrassa, wipe your ass with stones, sell the donkey you ****ed to
a nearby village, marry a nine year-old , send your child off to an
indoctrination camp, practice thighing with little kids, ............
Practice all those and you too could become a prophet !!
Elif air ab tizak mohammad !!!!
info@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or apache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
politicsIranian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moslem cartoon character mohammad and his bumchum allaah were child
molesting goat ****ers and nikomaks
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' /' ')
\ /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
Up your ass mohammad - Elif air ab tizak!!!
info@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or apache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
politicsIranian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
