Arash Gharahmadani wrote:
> I wipe my ASS on Mohammed's FACE! wrote:
>> The following was posted by a young Australian convert to Islam in a
club
>> called "Islamic Sisterhood." This is a club that is mostly made up of
>> Western female converts to Islam. A couple of days ago this woman came
>> upon
>> the passage in the Quran which makes it legal for Muslim males to keep
>> female prisoners of war as slaves ("whom thy right hand possess") and
>> rape
>> them. She was "confused" about it. Today she posted some scholarly
>> Islamic
>> comments on this peculiar provision of the sharia. I reproduce this
>> commentary below.
>>
>> This scholarly commentary makes plain what is going on. Those women
whom
>> "thy right hand possess" are slaves who have no human rights and must
>> submit
>> ***ually to anyone who "owns" them. Such actions toward female
>> prisoners of
>> war is, today, considered a war crime under the Geneva Convention.
>>
>> There are nearly 700 hundred women in Islamic Sisterhood. Most of them
>> are
>> products of the Western democracies whom, you would think, would react
>> with
>> horror at this type of behavior being considered "God's Law".
>>
>> Yet, NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THESE LOVING "SISTERS" MADE ANY COMMENT AT
>> ALL ON
>> THIS POST:
>>
>> About Slave girls and what the right hand possesses:
>>
>> "It is not lawful for you (to marry other) women after this, nor to
>> change
>> them for other wives even though their beauty attracts you, except
those
>> (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possesses. And Allah is Ever
a
>> Watcher over all things." Surah 33:52
>>
>>
>>
>> Tafsir of this ayat take from Mawdudi's The Meaning of the Qur'an:
>>
>> Book 10, page 137, footnote no. 94
>> "This verse explains why one is permitted to have conjugal relations
with
>> one's slave-girls besides the wedded wives, and there is no
>> restriction on
>> their number. The same thing has also been stated in Surah An-Nisa:3;
>> Al-Mu'minun:6;
>> and Al-Ma'arij:30. In all these verses the slave-girls have been
>> mentioned
>> as a separate class from the wedded wives, and conjugal relations with
>> them
>> have been permitted. Moreover, verse 3 of Surah An-Nisa lays down the
>> number
>> of the wives as four, but neither has Allah fixed the number of the
>> slave-girls in that verse nor made any allusion to their number in the
>> other
>> relevant verses. Here, of course, the Holy Prophet is being addressed
and
>> told: 'It is no more lawful for you to take other women in marriage, or
>> divorce any of the present wives and take another wife in her stead;
>> slave-girls, however, are lawful.' This shows no restriction has been
>> imposed in respect of slave-girls.
>>
>> This however does not mean that the Divine Law has provided the rich an
>> op****tunity to purchase as many slave-girls as they like for their
carnal
>> indulgence. This is in fact how the self-seeking people have exploited
>> and
>> abused the Law. The Law had been made for the convenience of the
>> people; it
>> had not been made to be abused....The Shari'ah made all these laws
>> keeping
>> in view human conditions and requirements for the convenience of men."
>>
>> And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal
>> ***ual
>> acts). Except with their wives and the (women slaves and captives) whom
>> their right hand possess,--for (then) they are not to be blamed." Surah
>> 70:29-30
>>
>> Tafsir on this ayat refers you to Tafsir of Surah 23:6
>>
>>
>> "Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right
>> hands
>> possess,--for then, they are free from blame;" Surah 23:6
>>
>> "(1) Two categories of women have been excluded from the general
>> command of
>> guarding the private parts: (a) wives, (b) women who are legally in
one's
>> possession, i.e. slave-girls. Thus the verse clearly lays down the law
>> that
>> one is allowed to have ***ual relations with one's slave-girl as with
>> one's
>> wife, the basis being possession and not marriage. If marriage had
>> been the
>> condition, the slave-girl also would have been included among the
>> wives, and
>> there was no need to mention them separately..." Meaning of the Qur'an
>> Book
>> 8, page 10, footnote 7.
>>
>>
>>
>> "Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and
>> slaves) whom your hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you..."
>> Surah
>> 4:24
>>
>>
>>
>> Tafsir of Mawdudi, Book2, page 112, footnote 44:
>>
>> "That is, 'Those women, who became prisoners of war, while their
husbands
>> are left behind in the War Zone, are not unlawful because their
marriage
>> ties have been broken by the fact that they have come into the Islamic
>> Zone.
>> It is lawful to marry such women and make them wives, and it is also
>> lawful
>> for those, in whose possession they are, to have ***ual relations with
>> them.
>>
>> There was, however, a difference of opinion as to whether such a woman
is
>> lawful if her husband has also been captured along with her. Imam Abu
>> Hanifah and those of his way of thinking are of the opinion that the
>> marriage tie of such a pair should remain intact but Imam Malik and
>> Shafi'ee
>> are of the opinion that it should be broken.'
>>
>> As there exist many misunderstandings in the minds of people
>> concerning the
>> slave-girls taken as prisoners of war, the following should be
carefully
>> studied:
>>
>> (1) It is not lawful for a soldier to have conjugal relations with a
>> prisoner of war as soon as she falls into his hands. The Islamic Law
>> requires that all such women should be handed over to the government,
>> which
>> has the right to set them free or to exchange them with the Muslim
>> prisoners
>> in the hands of the enemy or distribute them among the soldiers. It is
>> lawful for a soldier to cohabit only with that woman who has been
>> formally
>> given to him by the Islamic government.
>>
>> (2) Even then, he shall have to wait for one monthly course before he
>> can
>> cohabit with her in order to ensure whether she is pregnant or not;
>> otherwise it shall be unlawful to cohabit with her before delivery.
>>
>> (3) It does not matter whether the female prisoner of war belongs to
the
>> People of the Book or not. Whatever her religion, she becomes lawful
>> for the
>> man to whom she has been given.
>>
>> (4) None but the one whom the slave-girl is given has the right to
>> "touch
>> her". The offspring of such a woman from his seed shall be his lawful
>> children and shall have the same legal rights as are given by the
>> Divine Law
>> to children from one's loins. After the birth of a child she cannot be
>> sold
>> as a slave-girl and shall automatically become free after her master's
>> death.
>>
>> (5) If the master marries his slave-girl with another man, he
>> forfeits his
>> conjugal rights over her, but retains other rights such as service
>> from her.
>>
>> (6) The maximum limit of four has not been prescribed for slave-girls
>> as in
>> the case of wives for the simple reason that the number of female
>> prisoners
>> of war is unpredictable. The lack of limit does by no means provide a
>> license for the well-to-do people to buy any number of slave-girls for
>> licentious purposes.
>>
>> (7) The proprietary rights over a slave male or female as given to a
>> person
>> by the government are transferable like all other legal proprietary
>> rights.
>>
>> (8) The handing over of the proprietary rights over a slave-girl to a
>> man
>> formally by the government makes her as much lawful for him as the
>> giving of
>> a hand of a free woman to a man by her parents or guardian by means of
>> nikah
>> (marriage ceremony). Therefore there is no reason why a man who does
not
>> hold marriage in detestation should hold ***ual intercourse with a
>> slave-girl in detestation.
>>
>> (9) When once the government hands over the female prisoner of war to
>> someone, it has no right whatever to take her back from him, just as
the
>> parent or guardian has no right after the woman is handed over to a man
>> through nikah.
>>
>> (10) It should also be noted well that if a military commander
>> tem****arily distributes female prisoners of war among the soldiers for
>> ***ual purposes, or permits them to have ***ual relations for the time
>> being, such an act shall be unlawful and there is absolutely no
>> difference
>> between this and fornication, and fornication is a crime according to
the
>> Islamic code."
>>
>>
> HOW TO BECOME A ****SKIN MOSLEM - this is how: **** goats, molest
> children, wear a beekeepers outfit all the time, never shower or bath,
> beat your wives, learn terrorist activities at a maddrassa, wipe your
> ass with stones, sell the donkey you ****ed to a nearby village, marry a
> nine year-old , send your child off to an indoctrination camp, practice
> thighing with little kids, ............ Practice all those and you too
> could become a prophet !!
>
HOW TO BECOME A ****SKIN MOSLEM - this is how: **** goats, **** your
mother (nikomak), molest children, wear a beekeepers outfit all the
time, never shower or bath, beat your wives, learn terrorist activities
at a maddrassa, wipe your ass with stones, sell the donkey you ****ed to
a nearby village, marry a nine year-old , send your child off to an
indoctrination camp, practice thighing with little kids, ............
Practice all those and you too could become a prophet !!
Elif air ab tizak mohammad !!!!
info@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or apache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
politicsIranian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
moslem cartoon character mohammad and his bumchum allaah were child
molesting goat ****ers and nikomaks
_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' /' ')
\ /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \
Up your ass mohammad - Elif air ab tizak!!!
info@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or apache@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
politicsIranian@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
