commie dropkick Flan wrote:
> On May 6, 11:11=EF=BF=BDpm, mosherkus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > On May 6, 10:22=EF=BF=BDpm, Fran <Fran.B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 6, 9:34=EF=BF=BDpm, mosherkus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >
> > > > On May 6, 3:46=EF=BF=BDpm, Fran <Fran.B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 6, 2:46=EF=BF=BDpm, Sir John Howard
<sirjohnhow...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Carpenter didn't cause offence - MP
> >
> > > > > >http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23654136-29277,00.html
> >
> > > > > > As state parliament prepared to resume sittings, Ms Radisich
sai=
d
> > > > > > nothing had happened on the night to cause her offence.
> >
> > > > > > But she did not deny the specific allegation that Mr Carpenter
l=
ifted
> > > > > > her top and exposed her bra.
> >
> > > > > > "At the event in 2004, nothing happened to cause either (then
La=
bor
> > > > > > MP) Louise (Pratt), nor I, any kind of offence," Ms Radisich
sai=
d as
> > > > > > she arrived at parliament house.
> >
> > > > > > "If it (the top) was lifted, it wasn't lifted by me."
> >
> > > > > > Dianne Guise, the Labor MP for Wanneroo, said she was sitting
in=
the
> > > > > > front row at the karaoke night and did not see anything
untoward=
..
> >
> > > > > So whatever happened and whoever did what, it was considered
> > > > > inoffensive by those there.
> >
> > > > > That makes it neither 'perverted' nor ***ual harassment.
> >
> > > > > LJH lies again.
> >
> > > > > Fran
> >
> > > > You know you pseudo leftist feminists are a disgrace to your own
> > > > cause.
> >
> > > Says a pseudo-educated rightwing dissembler. You wouldn't have the
> > > foggiest grasp, still less positive interest in what our cause was,
so=
> > > you're in no position to evaluate it. Here's a tip though, no
charge.
> > > Before making a claim, consider finding out what the key questions
> > > are, how they've been talked about and likely objections. That way,
> > > you finish up looking less stupid while dissembling.
> >
> > > > You could excuse an ALP ****bag from groping strippers or even
> > > > molesting kids
> >
> > > And here we have the real bee in your bonnet. You couldn't care less
> > > about the humanity of strippers or children. You just want to have
> > > some sub-political basis for hitting the ALP over the head.
> >
> > > As for me, I've no problem hitting the ALP over the head.
Politically,=
> > > I think they are a disgrace on a regular basis. I'm appalled that
Rudd=
> > > has blocked the ACT ALP from bringing in Gay Civil Union. The ALP
> > > should get the hell out of Iraq and dump 'clean coal' and give that
> > > silly laptops in schools program the axe and abandon the bulk of the
> > > tax cuts and adopt a different policy on the Murray Darling and much
> > > else. I am disgusted with Iemma in particular and with the failure
of
> > > his cabinet to follow ALP Conference on privatisation policy. Of
> > > course, you can't attack them politically because the things I
regard
> > > as disgraceful are things you approve of. So instead, you are led to
> > > try to score cheap points with cheap, empty and disingenuous
> > > moralising in a pathetic attempt to cover the rear ends of your
fellow=
> > > travellers amongst the conservatives.
> >
> > > What a sad case you are.
> >
> > > Fran
> >
> > you do realise this is a political discussion group eh?
>
> I do, which is why I find ignorant, disingenuous, sub-political,
> tabloid-style angst in this place objectionable.
Yes, we do find you objectionable.
|
