"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:48265788$0$17508$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tex wrote:
>> "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:slrng2al28.8ob.ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On 2008-05-09, Tex <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:slrng28hhb.90c.ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On 2008-05-07, Tex <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:slrng22idu.8mb.ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> On 2008-05-05, Tex <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:slrng1tbgm.8mk.ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> On 2008-05-04, Tex <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:slrng1qlkg.8la.ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2008-05-03, Tex <tropicus@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:slrng1neik.8la.ZekeGregory@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2008-05-02, Peter Webb
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <webbfamily@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Mark T" <snailmail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:481a5720$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "**Rowland Croucher**" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you live?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wonnarua country.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Maitland Regional Art Gallery Director, Joe Eisenberg,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> begins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his speeches for gallery openings with acknowledgement of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owners of the land - the Wonnarua people.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The original owners of my land were a nice family from Hong
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bull****. They were the previous holders of the freehold
>>>>>>>>>>>>> title,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out by the government that stole the land from the abos.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please provide evidence that my land was "stolen" from the
>>>>>>>>>>>> "abos".
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bet
>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't.
>>>>>>>>>>> Terra Nullius.
>>>>>>>>>> So, you can't provide a shred of evidence that the land I am on
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> "stolen". You really aren't too good with providing proof, are
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> Gregory?
>>>>>>>>> So, the invaders called the land empty, and declared it as the
>>>>>>>>> property of England's sovereign, even though the land wasn't
>>>>>>>>> empty.
>>>>>>>>> That's theft in anyone's book.
>
> Not for Chris Textor, that's why he sup****ts the Zionazis driving
> Palestinians from the land they occupied.
You must be thinking of Kevin Rudd - your pro-Israel leader. Bit
uncomfortable for you to think about, eh mr. Wicks?
> Like most White Eyepatch racist throwbacks who long for
> the rape of first nations under colonialism, Tex pretends history
> hasn't happened.
Pity you can't give any actual examples of that
>>>>>>>> You have proof my land wasn't empty?
>
> Yes, you moron, it's called anthropology and archeology.
So, you still don't have any actual proof
> Can there be ANY excuse for your appalling ignorance?
You're the one claiming land was "stolen"
> >>>>>>> Didn't think
>
> That is a reason, but not an excuse.
For you, yes
> >>>>>>> so
>
> So you are a ****wit! B^D
Now, now: just because you ran away over 250 times in one post is no
reason
to still be cranky about it :)
>>>>>>> It is impossible to prove a negative. How about we take the
opposite
>>>>>>> position:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you prove that your land was empty? Didn't think so.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Terra Nullius: "The land was empty (After we drove off the
blacks)."
> >>>>>>
>>>>>> No gregory,
>
> Of course you can't prove that your land was empty because
> the Sovereign authority which occupied it has admitted that
> it was not!
They have admitted no such thing.
> Your title is based on the admitted LIE of Terra Nullius,
> and you hold the land based on fiat, with no genuine claim
> to owner****p.
I paid for it from the last legitimate owner, which makes it mine. You
can't
show it was ever stolen from anybody, can you?
> >>>>> you are the one making the stupid claim that my land is
>>>>>> "stolen".
>
> Of course it was, you infantile twat, everyone knows that,
So why can't you prove it? Name the person it was "stolen" from
> and the Australian government has acknowledged that Terra
> Nullius was a lie.
Yet the government acknowledges my property rights.
> You seem to be the only fool even attempting
> to deny it! But then reason is not your strong point! B^D
You're the one who can't show proof for your claims, fagbags, despite your
hysteria.
>>>>> Can you show your land title being passed through hands back at
least
>>>>> 500 years?
>
> No, he can't. And he knows it.
> Textor has no foundation for his claims
What "claims"? You're the one claiming the land was "stolen", yet you can
show no proof.
>, so he relies on sophistry,
> but he has the intellectual skills of a five year old
You're the one who ran away over 250 times in one post, fagbags :)
>, so
> his "Nyah Nyah PROVE IT" attempt to cover up his flawed title
> simply makes him look both foolish and a devious lightweight.
Except you're the one who still can't prove your claims. No surprise
there.
>>>> Nope, just the last owner, which is all that matter
>>>>
>>> How convenient.... receiving stolen goods is still a crime.
>
> Exactly, his argument is that of every receiver of stolen goods,
> "the bloke who sold it too me claims to be the rightful owner"
The government recognised the previous owner as the rightful owner. Go ask
the ACT revenue office :)
> But Textor is not an unwitting dupe of someone cleverer than him
> (which includes everyone else ;-)
Is that why you ran away over 250 times in one post? Hehehe
> ..he's a witting dupe, one who
> knows, because the Sovereign Authority on which his title claim rests
> has ADMITTED IT, that the land WAS occupied, and taken.. it simply
> won't be given back.
So, who was it taken from? Bet you can't answer that one
> The truth is simple, but not simple enough for that simpleton.
Strange how you're the one who can't prove your claims, isn't it Fagbags?
>> So, what proof do you have that my land was "stolen"?
>
> The historical facts
Which you can't show. Who was my land stolen from?
>; the modern Australian nation began
> with European settlement, the prior inhabitants are still
> with us.
Who are these centuries-old individuals you claim my land was "stolen"
from?
> > Get back to us when you find some.
>
> No point, you have your White Eye-patches on. B^p
More of your weird fantasies.
> > I won't hold my breath
>
> What a great disappointment for the rest of Usenet
You might have to chicken out of more arguments in the future :)
|
