menes nyt homppeli muualle konffista scn
<sdr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kirjoitti
viestissä:d4690cca-6512-4f46-94dd-8ec4ba4901c3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lauren Keane wrote:
>
>> This time the potential affront is a film made by
>> right-wing Dutch politician Geert Wilders, in which
>> he denounces Islam's Koran as a "fascist" book
>> that "incites people to murder." Rumors put out
>> by the Wilders camp suggest he burns a copy of
>> the Koran in the film.
>
>> Both cartoon(s) and film are clearly crass and self-
>> serving exercises that pay lip service to the idea of
>> freedom of speech while being little more than
>> vehicles for xenophobia.
>
> Question: Is denouncing NAZI literature as
> "fascist" and "inciting people to murder" ...
> "clearly crass and self-serving exercises that
> pay lip service to the idea of freedom of
> speech while being little more than vehicles
> for xenophobia?"
>
> Surely the Answer must be that such a
> denunciation is either true or false, and
> therefore worthy or worthless.
>
> Well, while Hitler could be held responsible for
> the murders of up to 65 million human beings,
> there are some places in India ALONE where
> up to 35 million souls were butchered under
> the sanctions of The Koran. The toll of the
> Islamic genocide is in the hundreds of millions
> of human beings and it is still ongoing with no
> end in sight (and that doesn't even begin to take
> into consideration the countless civilizations,
> including all the Christian ones which once
> thrived in and around the fertile crescent, that
> were utterly obliterated by Islam... leaving
> behind the monstrous ruin and despair you see
> today everywhere in the Muslim world there).
> Butchery and murder are the school agenda of
> most Islamic children and the teachings of hate
> never end across the lifetimes of Muslims the
> world over... with the possible exception only
> of those who have not been converted to Islam
> long enough to have yet lost the values of their
> previous "human" cultures (as in Thailand, in
> Malaysia, in Indonesia, etc.)
>
> VISIT THOU: http://islamisbad.com
>
> Is it possible to libel Mohammed? Could anything
> bad enough or objectionable enough ever be said
> of this incomprehensibly reprehensible creep which
> he himself did not surpass many, many, many
> times over with his own vile criminal behavior and
> unimaginable personal degradation... as recorded
> by his own proud Islamic biographers? VISIT THOU:
>
> http://islamisbad.com/islamicterrorism.html
>
> Just today the UN OKed Islamic Text
> Against Defamation ...
>
>> The document, which was put forward
>> by the Organization of the Islamic
>> Conference, "expresses deep concern
>> at attempts to identify Islam with
>> terrorism, violence and human rights
>> violations."
>
> Perhaps those who are trying to "defame"
> Islam should simply cite the Koran:
>
> 1. [3.151] We will cast terror into the
> hearts of those who disbelieve ...
>
> 1. [8.12] When your Lord revealed to
> the angels: I am with you, therefore
> make firm those who believe. I will cast
> terror into the hearts of those who
> disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads
> and strike off every fingertip of them.
>
>> The resolution "urges states to take
>> actions to prohibit the dissemination ...
>> of racist and xenophobic ideas" and
>> material that would incite to religious
>> hatred.
>
> Oh, I'm sorry, if what the Islamic resolution
> is after is to ban the Koran, then, by all
> means, I for one am all for it:
>
> The Koran is a viciously cynical, unrelentingly
> martial instructionaire for the conquest and
> subjugation of the human race by any and all
> means... including encouraging rape & pillage
> by the conquerors if they live, and, if they die
> in the cause of this immoral conquest, heavenly
> rewards which only a monstrous Satan would
> provide its most loyal/depraved demons in Hell.
>
> No, it is religion(s) that should be banned.
>
> It is time for humanity to purge itself from
> pernicious and (mostly) vile superstitions
> which are not only dragging down our very
> humanity but destroying our morality with
> hate-mongering and a corrupting fight
> against democracy and human rights.
>
> We should pass a universal world-wide law
> which states categorically that "things are
> either real OR unreal," and that anyone
> caught trying to make anyone believe that
> a thing unreal IS real is committing a self-
> evident fraud (punishable by substantial
> prison time).
>
> Yes, it's going to be tough because, frankly,
> we are monkeys. And, who among us has
> not argued over the living room coffee table
> with someone about whether there is or
> there isn't a coffee table in the damn living
> room? But, it's a struggle to save lives and
> to perhaps even push mankind into
> progressing far enough ahead that we may
> survive the next extinction-causing asteroid
> that is inevitably coming our way.
>
> S D Rodrian
> http://poems.sdrodrian.com
> http://thesolutionisthis.com
> http://mp3.sdrodrian.com
>
> All religions are local.
> Only science is universal.
>
>
|
