On 6 Mar, 05:23, ostap_bender_1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mar 5, 5:31=A0pm, Dmitry <dmitrijsfedot...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5 Mar, 21:17, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Dmitry wrote:
> > > > On 5 Mar, 16:46, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> a piece of silly discussion still is going on in Britain,
>
> > > > I'm sure that the majority of Brits are not even aware of recent
> > > > Russian election. =A0The pro****tion of coverage by news channels
her=
e
> > > > was of a similar lenght to a Tesco advert. =A0Litvienko/Lugovoi
had =
far
> > > > more coverage than Medvedev, yet Obama/Clinton competition has now
> > > > taken almost as much space as Iraq/Afghanistan. =A0Neither Russia
ha=
s
> > > > much coverage here, nor are many people interested in what is
> > > > happening in Russia.
>
> > > >> from The Japan Times for educational scores:
>
> > > > But they may do in Japan. =A0There are some islands to dispute.
>
> > > >>http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/eo20080305gd.html
>
> > > Sure, Britain doesn't have much time left to pay attention to
Russia's=
> > > election, as much more urgent domestic problems require attention,
lik=
e
> > > learning Koran:
>
> >
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=3D/news/2008/02/08/nrowa=
....
>
> > This is old news, Vladimir, it was about 4 weeks ago. =A0People have
> > forgotten about it already. =A0There were many fresh headlines since
> > then.
>
> You mean the good old nomadic tradition: **** and move on to new ****?
No. I meant that some events are less significant than the others.
|
