On May 3, 3:17 am, vello <vellok...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 3, 7:38 am, ostap_bender_1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 8:18 am, "Henry Alminas" <halmi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > ... space" matushka is in the process
> > > of engulfing her neighbors yet one
> > > more time. These activities need to
> > > be closely monitored by the Balts. Akin
> > > to the case in Georgia matushka planted
> > > great numbers of her colonizing
> > > kiddies in the Baltics (post war) and has been
> > > making noises about "protecting her
> > > compatriots" for some time now.
>
> > > One should note, however, that rather than
> > > the "bull in the china shop" approach used
> > > in Georgia they are engaged much more
> > > subtle moves.
>
> > > Why - one might ask. The answer is very
> > > simple the Baltic countries are in NATO
> > > - even if largely symbolically. Thus the
> > > Kremlin is not quite sure as to the reaction
> > > of this organization to its more crass (and
> > > more natural for russkies) activities. As a
> > > result it has restricted itself to doing "spade
> > > work" in preparation of getting the Baltic
> > > countries into a Georgian position. It is
> > > investing massive efforts (and funds) in
> > > driving a wedge between the Baltic countries
> > > and other club members within NATO as
> > > well as the EU. This effort has been but
> > > moderately successful. On the other hand
> > > the Kremlin has lots of time.
>
> > > Certainly Europe, Rather than being mesmerized
> > > by the ****ographic spectacle of the ongoing
> > > krautoid-russkie fornication, needs to wake
> > > up and understand that the Kremlin is playing
> > > the same old russkie game - a game that has not
> > > even gained much in sophistication over the many
> > > centuries.
>
> > > Surely even in societies, completely submerged
> > > within a "I got mine/wanna get mine" mentality,
> > > there must be individuals with enough
> > > intelligence to recognize the game and enough
> > > intestinal fortitude to condemn it and counteract
> > > it.
>
> > > That is all I ask.
>
> > > Best - - Henry
>
> > > For educational purposes only:
>
> > > From: The Jamestown Foundation
> > > (Eurasia Daily Monitor)
>
> > > ANNEXATION AND MILITARIZATION OF
> > > ABKHAZIA CONTINUE APACE
>
> > That's clearly a typo: "Akhazia" instead of "Kosovo". Clearly, this
> > article was written back in the 1990s about NATO's aggression against
> > Serbia, stealing Koovo and destroying Serbia's territorial integrity.
> > However, some clown took that old article, replaced "Kosovo" with
> > "Akhazia" everywhere, "Serbia" with "Georgia", and "NATO" with
> > "Russia". What a cheap piece of plagiarism. I wonder what clown did
> > that...
>
> Well there are also differencies - serbians were tiny minority in
> kosovo, but georgians clear maiority in Abkhazia.
No, they are not. That's plainly wrong.
> Is it somehow im****tant to you?
|
