Re: Judging by some press articles....

Mikhail Medved wrote:
> On May 5, 4:48 am, Anton <anton.use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Mikhail Medved kirjoitti:

>>> Not exactly. Russia asked Poland politely to dispose of a stupid
>>> grandstanding prime minister and appoint a more reasonable guy.

>> Ok, we understand the thinking of the Kremlin: the Poles must appoint
>> the prime minister Moscow wants. Thank you Mikhail for making it clear
>> the Russian view of the word "sovereignity".

>> Russian-English dictionary:
>>
>> Sovereignity = Moscow decides who is the leader in your country.

> I can claim no knowledge of "Kremlin thinking". How about some logical
> thinking?

Moscow tells the Poles who runs Poland - Is that your idea of "logical 
thinking"?

> I don't think pan Tusk is a man appointed by the Kremlin. He is just a
> man with whom it is possible to do business.

Luckily the Kremlin lacks the influence to do that. Not that Russia 
wouldn't want to tell others who should be in their government.

> What does sovereignity have to do with it?

Sovereign countries elect their own representatives. Neo-imperialist 
countries on the other hand tell other countries who they think is 
good/not good to run that country.

>> (Disclaimer: not that I personally like those Polish brothers at all.
>> They are cocky trouble makers with no team work skills whatsoever.
>> However that is the Darwinistic beaty of true modern democracy: you are
>> a ****y ruler -> you lose the next elections.)

> Yeah, that's right. The guy was disgusting both to his own
> constituents, and to Russia. What's wrong with Russia wanting him
> out?

Why do you think Russia has any business whatsoever in who runs Poland?

-- 
Anton