Re: Nude pictures are illegal in Nazi Finland Turku

"jerevan" <armenia@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kirjoitti 
viestissä:NbWTj.347338$LN.333515@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Mitsos**" <smyrna@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kirjoitti 
> viestissä:fvnqsr$l82$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Mitsos** wrote:
>>> The Nazi cop now found 5 pictures of a 16 years old slightly dressed 
>>> woman and is now suing me for pedophilia (I have 150.000 nude pictures
= 
>>> average age 25-35 )This young women has no sex nor shows her genitals
in 
>>> a explicit way. She is standing or sitting. Also the reason why the
come 
>>> to my flat on January 7 2008 with a search warrant has changed now.
Then 
>>> it was because of a Youtube video made by Sean and removed by me from 
>>> Youtube because I send a passport picture to Youtube and demanded that

>>> they remove the racist videos. So 5 months later the reason for the 
>>> search warrant changed!! Now its the 5 nude pictures of a 16 years
old.
>>> If this is not a police state I don't know what is. Those pictures
were 
>>> even under the dictatorship we had in Greece between 67-74 legal.
>>> I suspect the Nazi cop has deleted all my art work from my computer.
>>> Worth 40.000 Euro and up.
>>
>> This definition refers to acts at the extreme end of the spectrum of 
>> sexual activity -- acts involving nudity or intimate sexual activity 
>> represented in a graphic and unambiguous fashion , so kissing, or non 
>> sexual nudity are not considered "sexually explicit conduct".
>>
>> Secondly, the "dominant characteristic" of a visual representation
should 
>> be the depiction of the child's sexual organ or anal region in a manner

>> that is reasonably perceived as intended to cause sexual stimulation to

>> some viewers. Innocent photographs of a baby in the bath and other 
>> representations of non-sexual nudity are not covered by the offence.
>>
http://www.legi-internet.ro/index.php/Internet_child_pornography/122/0/?&L=2
>> This Nazi cop tries to drive me crazy.
>> When he accused me of kiddie porn because of 4-5 nude non sexual
>> ( then the asshole was claiming most of them where the shit of his sick

>> fantasy. The young cop agreed with me. 99% of my pics were in the age 
>> 25-35 and very little porn. Almost all were nude pictures of adult
women.
>> ( A tiny rest those few innocent pictures the crap cop want to turn in
to 
>> kiddie porn.
>> This cop should be nominated to asshole of the year.)
>> explicit pictures of a 16 year old women ( perhaps 18? )
>> Since when has nudity become kiddie porn?
>> The reason why I said to that asshole!
>> If this is kiddie porn you should close down the museum because I have 
>> seen there nude pictures too.
>
> And one more comment:
> I have been downloading pictures from the binaries news groups since
1998 
> and not one single time did I download a single picture of kiddie porn. 
> Not even by misstake.
> So the 4 pictures of a 16 years old girl might be pictures of an 18
years 
> old girl because I always guess the age of younge women lower then they 
> are.
> As today in the youth place. I guessed her 17 but she was 22.
> Now the dirty cop wants to turn nude in to porn and a young woman in to
a 
> child and the 4 pictures he found he wants to turn in to " most pictures

> ".
> Hey asshole from Turku, I know you reading this!
> I have 150.000 pictures and you showed me 4 only, claiming falsely its 
> kiddie porn.
> See you in court asshole and lets see how long you will keep your job 
> asshole.
>
Plus a few good links for my American friends:
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Finnish_internet_censorship_critic_blacklisted
 http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2008-02-18.html
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAiNrqAoreU
 and again

http://www.legi-internet.ro/index.php/Internet_child_pornography/122/0/?&L=2
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/18/finnish_policy_censor_activist/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/18/finnish_policy_censor_activist/comments/The
comments are very good