Re: The History of Latvia

On May 6, 11:23=C2=A0pm, P=C4=93teris Cedri=C5=86=C5=A1 (Peteris Cedrins)
<cedr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On 7 Maijs, 09:15, ostap_bender_1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> > Why don't you address the issue why you consider Transdniestria to be
> > "essentially Rumanian"?
>
> Excuse me, but read the title of this thread, please -- it has nothing
> to do with Transnistria, Kosovo, little defenseless Serbia, or any of
> your other rocking-horses. I am weary of hopping all over the space-
> time continuum so that you can continue to spout your crypto-sovok
> obsessions =C3=A0 la californienne.
>

I know. it is about the stuff from much more than 25 years ago. But we
had a discussion about Transdniestria a few months ago, and when I
confronted you with your hypocricy, you ran away with your tail
between your legs. So, I was hoping that the Wizard may have given you
some bravery recently and you would dare to answer my question about
Transdniestria and Rumania. But evidently, you are still as cowardly
as ever, lion.