Re: Judging by some press articles....

Anton wrote:
> Mikhail Medved wrote:
>> On May 5, 4:48 am, Anton <anton.use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> Mikhail Medved kirjoitti:
> 
>>>> Not exactly. Russia asked Poland politely to dispose of a stupid
>>>> grandstanding prime minister and appoint a more reasonable guy.
> 
>>> Ok, we understand the thinking of the Kremlin: the Poles must appoint
>>> the prime minister Moscow wants. Thank you Mikhail for making it clear
>>> the Russian view of the word "sovereignity".
> 
>>> Russian-English dictionary:
>>>
>>> Sovereignity = Moscow decides who is the leader in your country.
> 
>> I can claim no knowledge of "Kremlin thinking". How about some logical
>> thinking?
> 
> Moscow tells the Poles who runs Poland - Is that your idea of "logical 
> thinking"?
> 
>> I don't think pan Tusk is a man appointed by the Kremlin. He is just a
>> man with whom it is possible to do business.
> 
> Luckily the Kremlin lacks the influence to do that. Not that Russia 
> wouldn't want to tell others who should be in their government.
> 
>> What does sovereignity have to do with it?
> 
> Sovereign countries elect their own representatives. Neo-imperialist 
> countries on the other hand tell other countries who they think is 
> good/not good to run that country.

Oh, come on, - why wrap up such an enlightening for poor Russkies 
lecture at a such interesting moment - not decide for independent nation 
whom to elect? Or maybe you just didn't want somebody remembered that 
story :

http://www.ahmp.org/MedByp1.html

I really like it when you guys go righteous - it is such a joy to watch 
you like that Midwest preachers being caught in bed with male prostitute.

VM.

> 
>>> (Disclaimer: not that I personally like those Polish brothers at all.
>>> They are cocky trouble makers with no team work skills whatsoever.
>>> However that is the Darwinistic beaty of true modern democracy: you
are
>>> a ****y ruler -> you lose the next elections.)
> 
>> Yeah, that's right. The guy was disgusting both to his own
>> constituents, and to Russia. What's wrong with Russia wanting him
>> out?
> 
> Why do you think Russia has any business whatsoever in who runs Poland?
>