On May 5, 5:18 pm, Anton <anton.use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mikhail Medved wrote:
> > On May 5, 4:48 am, Anton <anton.use...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Mikhail Medved kirjoitti:
> >>> Not exactly. Russia asked Poland politely to dispose of a stupid
> >>> grandstanding prime minister and appoint a more reasonable guy.
> >> Ok, we understand the thinking of the Kremlin: the Poles must appoint
> >> the prime minister Moscow wants. Thank you Mikhail for making it
clear
> >> the Russian view of the word "sovereignity".
> >> Russian-English dictionary:
>
> >> Sovereignity = Moscow decides who is the leader in your country.
> > I can claim no knowledge of "Kremlin thinking". How about some logical
> > thinking?
>
> Moscow tells the Poles who runs Poland - Is that your idea of "logical
> thinking"?
>
> > I don't think pan Tusk is a man appointed by the Kremlin. He is just a
> > man with whom it is possible to do business.
>
> Luckily the Kremlin lacks the influence to do that. Not that Russia
> wouldn't want to tell others who should be in their government.
I don't need your childish lecture on sovereignity. Yes, if some
country is led by an unacceptable leader, other countries tell
influential groups to get rid of that leader. It's happening all the
time.
Of course, I am not advocating direct manipulation of elections from
the outside or, God forbid, military action. Although Poland, as far
as I remember, very recently went to a war with a very distant country
with the goal of changing the government of that country.
> > What does sovereignity have to do with it?
>
> Sovereign countries elect their own representatives. Neo-imperialist
> countries on the other hand tell other countries who they think is
> good/not good to run that country.
Grow up. All countries having resources to do so express their
displeasure if some mad guy runs the neighboring country. That
displeasure takes forms of diplomatic notes, economic or political
sanctions.
> >> (Disclaimer: not that I personally like those Polish brothers at all.
> >> They are cocky trouble makers with no team work skills whatsoever.
> >> However that is the Darwinistic beaty of true modern democracy: you
are
> >> a shitty ruler -> you lose the next elections.)
> > Yeah, that's right. The guy was disgusting both to his own
> > constituents, and to Russia. What's wrong with Russia wanting him
> > out?
>
> Why do you think Russia has any business whatsoever in who runs Poland?
Why not? If Poland wants to do business with Russia, it has to have a
leader, who is an acceptable partner. It's that simple, really not a
rocket science, I don't understand what part of it you don't get.
> --
> Anton
|
