On May 11, 12:38=A0am, hol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Eugene Holman) wrote:
> In article
> <f8eb194f-9586-4134-9ad6-bac011c4f...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
vello=
>
> <vellok...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> <deletions>
>
> > It's up to american voters do they prefere Bushmans or not as
> > presidents. American practice is to ELECT presidents
>
> G. W. Bush "elected" in 1999? Al Gore got half a million more popular
> votes than GWB did, but the election was decided when a Suoreme Court
> decision was made to stop counting the votes in Floriada, where G. W.
> Bush's brother and associates were in charge of things, and declare Bush
> the winner.
Well, we talk about possible comparison between US and Russia. So to
make ends meet we had to imagine that Clinton just orders Gore as his
successor :-)
>
> > - now it is also
> > practice even for Ukraine. Russia is still virgin in this aspect of
> > democracy.
>
> Maybe so, but the overwhelming majority - about 70% - of the Russian
> electorate sup****ts Putin's politics and choice of successor because
they
> understand that it is hard to argue with success. The American
electorate
> is not equally keen on GWB and his legacy, since never in the history of
> American polling has an in***bant president received such a low (29%)
> approvsl rating.
>
Yeah, thats the weak side of democracy - to success you had to really
run fast, not just put media to glorify your imaginable world records.
I don't think Bush is top president for US just I'm sad about fate of
democracy in russia.
|
