On May 18, 2:10 am, martin <marti...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 18, 2:16 pm, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > vello wrote:
> > > On May 17, 10:31 pm, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> vello wrote:
> > >>> On May 17, 8:22 pm, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>> Eugene Holman wrote:
> >
>>>>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in...
> > >>>> Tabloid trash spitting filth, what a news.
> > >>> What's in this piece that you find incorrect exept language
possibly?
> > >> I haven't read it - I dismissed it as soon as I read the title.
E.g. I
> > >> also do not open posts which title "Zhids Cheka killed....". Well,
if
> > >> one day such a post title comes from Holman or Cedrins I will
definitely
> > >> open it - it would have a special value.
> > >> Come on Vello, - NYT is tabloidish enough to descend into
underground
> > >> sewage of Daily Mail.
>
> > >> VM.
>
> > > Well, Daily Mail is not a too yellow one, and yellow media is not
> > > "wrong" per se, they just selected their writings accordingly what
> > > they think is public demand. Even more wrong (=stupid) is to vague
> > > some particular story on basis where it was print. you had more
> > > changes to find brilliant pieces of writing in some serious paper
then
> > > in yellow one but it's just statistics. Truth 8or lie9 is inside any
> > > story itself, no matter where it was print.
> > > to say "boo2 on some story without reading it reminds me brave
workers
> > > and farmers in SU condemning books of dissidents they never had in
> > > hands.
>
> > I can only repeat myself - I do not click on posts "Zhids Cheka killed
> > untold number of Russkie children". I also do not click on the tabloid
> > link titled "Fascist Putin builds an Czarist empire" or whatever that
> > Daily Mail title was. What's the point? Such a title is a thesis in
> > itself and the rest is supposed to be an argument. The thesis is
> > mothballed by today and thrown away. It was entertaining few years
ago,
> > today it's just no better than neocon's crap about "terrorist enemy is
> > coming" - the thing to sell either to Eastern Europe, full of bad
> > memories or in the Western supermarkets - Booze, Bacon, Lottery and
Crap.
> > You want to show me that Putin is hurting country and the world - show
> > me the Numbers. Because as of today all the numbers are on his side,
on
> > the side of his opponents - "Putin is a fascist" which translates into
> > numbers anyway - "he cut us from sucking Russia's riches for free".
>
> > VM.
>
> Jonathan Dimbleby is a well respected author who is a bit of a
> Russophile, having recently published a book about Russia,
seehttp://www.amazon.co.uk/Russia-Journey-Heart-Land-People/dp/056353912...
> If he writes an article critical of Putin, you should be worried Vlad,
> very worried about what Putin is doing to Russia.
In this forum, anyone, who is not raving mad against Russia, is
branded as "Russophile".
Taking a trip across Russia doesn't make one a Russophile, and books
by "well-respected authors" usually get at least one reader's review.
|
