On May 18, 9:15=A0pm, Mikhail Medved <mikhail_b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 18, 9:15 am, vello <vellok...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 18, 3:58 pm, Mikhail Medved <mikhail_b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 17, 1:44 pm, vello <vellok...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 17, 8:22 pm, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > Eugene Holman wrote:
> > > > >
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.htm=
l?in...
>
> > > > > Tabloid trash spitting filth, what a news.
>
> > > > What's in this piece that you find incorrect exept language
possibly=
?
>
> > > Language is a tool to deliver ideas. Trashy language can't deliver
> > > ideas by definition. An intellectual won't even waste his/her time
> > > after seeing the title.
>
> > But 2x2=3D4 no matter is it said in Oxford english or in some barbaric
> > dialect.
>
> Did you bother to read the article?
>
> Take this, for example:
>
> <<When Mikhail Khodorkovsky, once the richest man in Russia, used his
> oil wealth to promote human rights and democracy, Putin detected a
> threat to his throne.>>
>
> Don't take me wrong, I am not sup****tive of selective prosecution of
> thieves based on their political alliances, but since when using
> personal wealth to gain political power is "promotion of human rights
> and democracy"?
>
> This is what I call "sub-standard journalism", not "2x2=3D4".- Hide
quoted=
text -
>
Thanks, Mikhail, after lots of posts yours was first dealing with
message itself, not with looks and shoes of a messenger. I'm not
informed enough to say something about Khodorkovsky's case. Generally,
I sup****t anything in Russia what turns them more swiss-like, and
dislike anything what turns them more red/brown-like. from that
wiewpoint there was a lot of right words in particular writing.
|
