vello wrote:
> On May 18, 7:16 am, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> vello wrote:
>>> On May 17, 10:31 pm, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> vello wrote:
>>>>> On May 17, 8:22 pm, Vladimir Makarenko <vmak...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Eugene Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in...
>>>>>> Tabloid trash spitting filth, what a news.
>>>>> What's in this piece that you find incorrect exept language
possibly?
>>>> I haven't read it - I dismissed it as soon as I read the title. E.g.
I
>>>> also do not open posts which title "Zhids Cheka killed....". Well, if
>>>> one day such a post title comes from Holman or Cedrins I will
definitely
>>>> open it - it would have a special value.
>>>> Come on Vello, - NYT is tabloidish enough to descend into underground
>>>> sewage of Daily Mail.
>>>> VM.
>>> Well, Daily Mail is not a too yellow one, and yellow media is not
>>> "wrong" per se, they just selected their writings accordingly what
>>> they think is public demand. Even more wrong (=stupid) is to vague
>>> some particular story on basis where it was print. you had more
>>> changes to find brilliant pieces of writing in some serious paper then
>>> in yellow one but it's just statistics. Truth 8or lie9 is inside any
>>> story itself, no matter where it was print.
>>> to say "boo2 on some story without reading it reminds me brave workers
>>> and farmers in SU condemning books of dissidents they never had in
>>> hands.
>> I can only repeat myself - I do not click on posts "Zhids Cheka killed
>> untold number of Russkie children". I also do not click on the tabloid
>> link titled "Fascist Putin builds an Czarist empire" or whatever that
>> Daily Mail title was. What's the point? Such a title is a thesis in
>> itself and the rest is supposed to be an argument. The thesis is
>> mothballed by today and thrown away. It was entertaining few years ago,
>> today it's just no better than neocon's crap about "terrorist enemy is
>> coming" - the thing to sell either to Eastern Europe, full of bad
>> memories or in the Western supermarkets - Booze, Bacon, Lottery and
Crap.
>> You want to show me that Putin is hurting country and the world - show
>> me the Numbers. Because as of today all the numbers are on his side, on
>> the side of his opponents - "Putin is a fascist" which translates into
>> numbers anyway - "he cut us from sucking Russia's riches for free".
>>
>> VM.
>
> I subscribe what you can say - but in case you don't read special
> topics, you should'nt comment them. commenting thingd you are no idea
> about is always show of ----- - put right word by yourself :-)
OK, first, I did read the title - which has a word there which has
almost mathematically rigorous meaning: "totalitarian". Lie number one.
Secondly, I think you owe me a drink - I surrendered and did read the
article: that said, no good news coming, - as I expected: crap.
Just as an example one single paragraph from the crap:
"It has not helped to resurrect a health service which is on its knees
(and is ranked by the World Health Organisation as 130th out of the 190
countries of the UN), or to rebuild an education system which is so
under-funded that the poor have to pay to get their children into
a half-decent school or college."
All the above is a lie. Except probably "ranking" by WHO. The Putin
years changed RADICALLY situation in health care and education. Remember
that every newborn in today's Russia is assigned a hefty college fund?
Internet access of public schools just accomplished. Competition levels
to college entries are back to 80-ties marks.
Computerisation of the all healthcare institutions is now in works -
mind you - that work isn't even started here in the States. Life
expectancy is growing. Child death rate is down, etc.ect.etc.
And this paragraph of lies in this article is just a tip of the iceberg.
> About endangering world or his own society - it is thing you can't
> count in money. all "numbers" were good for Herr Adolf also.
As a matter of fact they were not, them the numbers were disastrous, as
comes as no surprise - his regime run social and military programs on
loans from private banks, bringing state debt and budget deficit to
catastrophic amounts. Indeed as I read by 1940 German state was facing
default situation on debt payments. One may wonder if WWII was started
as an escape route. Some argue it was.
> Personally I'm not a fan of any guy thinking he is set by god to know
> better what people must read/see on TV then people himself.
You definitely have a problem with W Bush, but be merciful - he is
heading to his ranch in Texas next January and forever.
As to Russia - I can again only repeat myself or rather what is a corner
strategy idea- release the pressure in accordance with middle class
numbers as a percentage of electorate. Which is supposed to become the
defining force by ~ 2025. So that no Zhirinovski, Zuganov or a Western
oil companies' stooge had chances to get to the top.
If you disagree with that strategy - suggest a sound alternative.
VM.
>
|
