On May 7, 11:23=A0am, koolfireii...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On May 7, 8:47=A0pm, Javed Iqbal Kaleem <javediqbalkal...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> =A0hehehehehehe donkey kaleem,itne ghand mara,itne ghand mara,it will
> take 6 months for your to recuperate.In the first aid box,more than
> surgical cotton, tincture,Dettol,plaster,scissors,keep big
> needle,garden shear and thread,or jute rope from Dhaka,in ample
> quantity.
Three of the four provinces of Pakistan are opposed to the Kalabagh
dam. In fact, legislators of these 3 provinces have already passed
resolutions opposing the dam.
Only Punjab is pu****ng for it, primarily because the project is for
the benefit of military officials most of whom hail from a few
districts in Punjab.
The concern is that the dam would submerge large swathes of fertile
Peshawar valley in Pashtunkhwa and deprive Sindh and Balochistan
provinces of their due shares of the Indus waters.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
http://www.dawn.com/2008/04/23/top9.htm
DAWN, Karachi, Pakistan
April 23, 2008 Wednesday Rabi-us-Sani 16, 1429
=2E....Ms Jamani and some of her other colleagues argued the project
should not be taken up after resolutions passed by the provincial
assemblies of Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan against it and called for
implementing alternative plans......
=2E....=93We will not let Kalabagh dam be built,=94 PPP=92s Shagufta
Jamani
said angrily after PML-N member Chaudhry Ejaz Virk picked up Mr
Wattoo=92s theme by saying the proposed dam could be called =93Quaid-i-
Azam Dam=94 as a way of appeasing its it would submerge large swathes of
fertile Peshawar valley in the North West Frontier Province and
deprive Sindh and Balochistan provinces of their due shares of the
Indus watersopponents, who actually argue against the project over
fears ......
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
