Re: Hilsa From Maharashtra & Gujarat Replaces Bangladesh Variety
by Romanise <joshidm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Jul 6, 2008 at 11:24 PM
On Jul 7, 6:51 am, Wanderer <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Romanise wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 6:29 am, nkdatta2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> http://www.thehindu.com/2008/07/07/stories/2008070756512000.htm
>
> >> HINDU
> >> July 7, 2008
>
> >> Mumbai hilsa replaces Bangladesh variety
>
> >> [....]
>
> > ****bandar became a major fi****ng ****t in early eighties. Locals joined
> > hands with Keralite to set up several most modern processing plants.
> > Output has been trans****ted by refrigerated trucks right from
> > beginning to West Bengal.
>
> Where in Mumbai are the hilsa harvested from, do you know?
I am knot knowledgeable on fish varieties. But I assume it is the kind
of water that will determine what fish can be raised. West coast does
not have rivers like Ganges and Brahmaputra entering sea. After
Narmada no significant river enters sea on the west coast. Sea inlets
are many and I am sure fish-farms have come up in many places. Intake
of fish in Gujarat being very low it has to be ex****ted.