"donquijote1954" <nolionnoproblem@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> kirjoitti
viestissä:fea7891a-08fd-413d-befc-900225daa715@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the following political debate you will see the hypocrisy of a
> model based on pretty words like "democracy" and "nation building,"
> which are intended to hide the fact that this world is ruled like a
> jungle...
>
> Yep, "kill or be killed," "the big fish eats the little fish" and
> "camouflage" (the lie) are all survival strategies played both among
> prey and predator. So I'm proposing that this jungle model is adopted
> in international relations, and that accordingly "the little fish"
> develop an strategy for survival. There's a very clever solution used
> by the smart monkey...
>
>> How about North Korea, with its announced capability in nuclear
weapons?
>> Why choose to negotiate with NK, but invade Iraq, which had no weapons
>> of mass destruction at all?
>
>> I think I know the answer: Iraq has oil. NK has no oil, but has a
>> standing army of 1,000,000 men ready to repel any invasion.
>
>> Bush's law: Never invade a country that has no oil and will fight back.
>
> Yeah. The dinosaurs used the same strategy: Go for easy, juicy prey.
>
> The ensuing arms race though is bad for both predator and prey...
>
> "Avoiding arms races is best for both predators and prey, because of
> the likelihood of a terminal extinction that neither survive."
>
> The Predator Model (a better model for survival in the present world)
>
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/cuius/idle/evolution/malthus/predator.html
>
> So Bush's law is jungle's law, and it's driving us toward mass
> extinction. Yep, we are endangered species.
>
> Only hope is that the predator becomes a vegetarian. Thus the need for
> the Banana Revolution. ;)
>
> WHY THE BANANA REVOLUTION?
> http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
|
